Is there a way to downsize costs but still keep morale up? Yes, says Matt Richtel in the New York Times. Richtel recently wrote about how many companies are seeking alternatives to layoffs — basically by cutting labor costs but hanging on to the labor.
Instead of slashing their work forces, they’re nipping and tucking with things like four-day workweeks, unpaid vacations and furloughs (voluntary or enforced), wage and overtime freezes, pension cuts, flexible work schedules, and reductions in benefits.
Why? There are a variety of reasons, but a prominent one involves keeping morale high. Layoffs create a gloom-and-doom environment and can hurt motivation and productivity, whereas companies that seek out alternatives before turning to the ax can expect more long-term loyalty among their workers.
Clearly if your job is on the chopping block you’d prefer a different option. But what’s interesting is the fact that many employees are buying in even if layoffs may not be affecting them directly. For example, according to the article, more than 30 percent of Brandeis University’s professors and instructors volunteered to give up 1 percent of their pay, preventing layoffs for several employees.
I’m curious what Team Taskmaster readers would do in this situation. So…









