BNET Insight

Team Taskmaster

Get more out of your team and your time.

What Would Lance Armstrong Do?, Part 2

August 1st, 2007 @ 10:50 am

1 Comment

Categories: Collaboration, Strategy, Teamwork, Tips

Tags: Team, Team Leader, Jeff Palfini

Here are more ways that the Tour de France’s first-rate teams exemplify collaboration.

Sending Riders Back for Stragglers — Riders wear earpieces so if one of their teammates falls behind, the manager can alert them and have the stronger rider drop back to pace their teammate back into the pack.

Business Behavior: If someone is struggling to keep up with their work, why not send an efficient colleague to help them get back up to speed? Or offer to help out yourself. Not only will it ensure that the team won’t fall too far behind, it will give the workers the sense that you are looking out for them.

Give The Very Tire Off Your Bike – There is hardly a more selfless display of teamwork than when a team leader gets a flat at a critical stage in the race. They almost always have domestiques nearby, who won’t hesitate to take off one of theirs and send their leader off — staying behind themselves for the team car to deliver a replacement.

Business Behavior: Taking a hit for the good of the team is usually something a manager will “ask” an underling to do. Not that he had much choice, but we felt for Fred Reid, former CEO of Virgin America, who, nearing the launch of the new low-cost airline, was forced to resign among concerns that he was too closely tied with Virgin founder and foreign citizen Richard Branson, apparently a no-no for U.S. airline regulators.

Know your Task, But Keep Flexible –Riders begin the Tour with a solid idea of where they fit in on the team. There is the sprint leader, the lead-out man, the climber, the general classification rider, the team leader and the domestique, all of whom have a good idea of what their job entails. But there is enough flex built into the system that if someone emerges as a better candidate for team leader, the roles can shift. This year, some good days in the Alps brought Spanish rider Alberto Contador the leadership role on his squad as he led the race in overall time. Former team leader Levi Leipheimer switched to a support role without an argument.

Business Behavior: An effective team should be limber enough to take full advantage of the ever-changing energy and skills of its members. Obviously, you can’t go around demoting people at the drop of a hat, but allowing people to cross task boundaries and showcase skills that perhaps they weren’t hired for will give your team not only flexibility, but investment in the task. Because, moreso than money, development drives the majority of your workers. Really.

Reward Behaviors, Not Just Numbers

Although the overall individual and team titles are the ultimate goals for most teams, the premium isn’t placed solely on time. Domestiques get plaudits for countering other teams moves, keeping track of breakaways, helping teammates rejoin the pack (called the peloton) after a crash, pushing the pace of the rest of the field for a few miles, even just getting out in front and putting the sponsor’s name (that adorns the front of the rider’s jersey) on the TV camera for a few minutes.

Business Behavior: Sometimes we get too caught up in one type of goal, whether it’s the quarterly profit, the revenues or units sold. People’s contributions don’t always directly translate to sales. Looking deeper for behaviors to reward shows that you appreciate people’s individual strengths and that you are paying closer attention than just reading the earnings summary every 3 months.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    dady_gonda@...

    08/08/07 | Report as spam

    "Know your Task, But Keep Flexible." Really ?

    I'm quite against this one.

    Many people (often the weak ones) believe that team work means making things work no matter what you have to do for that.

    This mindset does not push people to improve their skills and learn what they need to know to "survive", as they assume that there'll always be someone to do the job.
    We end up in the classical scheme where 20% of the staff will do 80% of the work.
    Being in the 20%, I find myself doing a lot of things that are out of my scope for the simple reason that I'm able to do them the right way, which is everything but pleasant.

    I rather believe that a team is like a body where staff members are organs. They have specific functions, tasks, that they have to performs. If each and every "organ" plays it's role, then the whole thing is working properly.

    "Flexibility" often hides the weaknesses of some team members in their specific scope of work that are compensated by others who are assigned another part of the job, and who'll have to work more and harder.

    The result is that as long the job gets delivered, the management will not realize that these "weak links" are unable to do their whole part of the job.
    They use "tricks" to keep their position whereas they should have trainings or get fired if they're neither willing nor able to upgrade their skills.

    Finally the skilled but frustrated employee will leave the company, seeking a better work environment and the enterprise will be left with the weak ones.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement