BNET Insight

Sales Machine

A, Always. B, Be. C, Closing.

Why "Scientific Forecasting" Flops

August 2nd, 2007 @ 6:04 am

2 Comments

Categories: Blogroll, General, Sales Tips

Tags: Sales, Forecasting, Geoffrey James

Sales forecasting in most firms is a mess. The alternative — scientific forecasting with a computerized market model — is a proven solution. Why then is scientific forecasting so rare? The answer is fear, on the part of everyone involved.

  • Sales reps are worried that if forecasting is generated from a computer model, they’ll loose what little control they have over setting their sales quotas.
  • Sales managers are afraid that if they can’t tweak the forecast, they’ll lose the ability to use forecasting to manipulate the behavior of their reps.
  • The marketing group is terrified that scientific forecasting will reveal the fact that their marketing efforts have almost no impact on actual sales.
  • The manufacturing group and the CFO from long experience doesn’t trust sales forecasts and thus is afraid that anything that involves input from the sales group will automatically be bogus.
  • The CEO is deathly afraid that scientific forecasting might make it impossible to temporarily goose up the stock price by presenting bold forecasts to the press and investors.

In short, the forecasting dance has become part of the culture of how most corporations work and the idea of replacing it with some sort of propeller-head hoodoo is simply too painful to contemplate. And that’s sad, because being able to actually predict what will sell in a fiscal quarter would, in most firms, increase profitability and create the kind of predictability that investors like.

Instead, forecasting in most firms remains a painful process that involves complicated negotiations, political maneuvers, management bluster and, when it comes time to report sales figures to the press, plenty of handwringing, scapegoating and (worse) “creative” accounting.

Unfortunately, moving to a scientific sales forecasting model, in most companies, would involve a top-to-bottom change in the behavior of nearly every organization impacted by the change. And those kind of changes take time - if they ever happen at all. I’m still waiting for the paperless office.

Next… how make forecasting less painful, without hiring a mathematician.

This Blog's Best Post: The Ultimate Cold Calling Tool

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Jeffryh

    08/02/07 | Report as spam

    In the abscence of science....

    ....Following milestones in a sales process and being honest in assessment can go far to help quantify forecasting. But and it's a big but, you've got to have sales people and management that realize that a true forecast should not be all sunshine and flowers anyway. If you have that then you've gained the power to leverage a forecast report to your advantage. Once you identifying what doesn't look good you know have the opportunity to turn those negatives into positives, if it's possible. Milestones - Metrics - Honesty.

  •  
    2

    mcontois@...

    08/08/07 | Report as spam

    Irony

    The benefits outweight the costs. There are several forecasting methods that can be used. Fear is something that must be dealt with. We all live with fear but we cannot let it control us.
    People need to get over themselves and learn to come together for a common purpose. We all have something to offer. CEOs and Presidents need to set the tone for the entire organization. They cannot expect to know everything. But of course by sharing information and asking for help in essence, then that may mean they are unable to justify their extraordinarily high salaries and bonuses that I do not feel that they deserve because they put themselves above what is good for the organization, its customers, its employees, and its shareholders. When you give some control, you often get so much more than just money. You earn respect, trust, and you have a world class organization that is breaking new ground. As globalization complicates matters, its important to involve more people to help break it down to actionable measures for the good of all. I have had the pleasure of working with some really smart people who are definitely not utilized to the fullest potential. It's at the expense of the majority.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Geoffrey James Geoffrey James has sold and written hundreds of features, articles and columns for national publications including Wired, Men's Health, Business 2.0, SellingPower, Brand World, Computer Gaming World, CIO, The New York Times and (of course) BNET. He is the author of seven books, including Business Wisdom of the Electronic Elite (translated into seven languages and selected by four book clubs), and The Tao of Programming (widely quoted on the Web as a "canonical book of... more »

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement