BNET Insight

Sales Machine

A, Always. B, Be. C, Closing.

How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

October 28th, 2009 @ 11:30 am

17 Comments

Categories: Ethics, Negotiations, Pitches, Presentations, Sales Tips

Tags: Competitor, Product Marketing, Customer Relationship Management (CRM), Strategy, Marketing, Enterprise Software, Software, Management, Geoffrey James

In the post “How to Outsell a Competitor’s Rep,” I explained a basic principle of competitive selling — knowing who you’re selling against.  In the post, I mentioned the concept of competitive positioning, which consists primarily of contrasting your strengths with a competitor’s weaknesses.  However, some readers wanted to know how to go about doing this, which is the reason for this post.

First, let’s start with some rules.

  • Rule #1: Never say anything bad about a competitor. Badmouthing a competitor tells the prospect that you’re bitter, angry and probably scummy.  It usually makes the competitor look good by comparison.
  • Rule #2: Warn the customer when a competitor is wrong for them. If you truly believe that the customer is about to make a big mistake by buying someone else’s products, it is your solemn duty to communicate that fact to them.

Rule 1 and rule 2 only seem to be mutually exclusive.  Resolving the apparent conflict requires a certain amount of finesse, but the basic approach is simple:

Ask questions that raise questions.

This technique is best explained with an example:

Suppose you’re selling for a start-up and your competitor is a large, established firm.  You know from your research that the competitor’s customer service function tends to handle customers in an arrogant manner.  By contrast, your firm is extremely easy to work with.

The challenge is to point out your competitive advantage without sounding like you’re running down the competition.  You might just claim to have “great customer service”, but the competitor probably claims the same thing.  To cinch the deal, you need to create contrast of the “we good; they bad” variety.

You could, of course, say something like: “Why would you want to work with those arrogant S.O.B.s?!?”  That is, you could if you wanted to take yourself out of the running for that opportunity.  Instead, you need to ask a question that gets the prospect thinking.  Like so:

  • You: “Just so I can be sure to provide value, who else are you talking to about this opportunity?”
  • Prospect: “We’ve had a meeting with MegaCorp Unlimited.”
  • You: “They’re certainly a pretty big, established company.  Have you talked to some of their customers about their service practices?”
  • Prospect: “No.  Why?”
  • You: “I’ve heard that they have their own ways of doing things.  You might want to ensure they have a service culture that matches your needs.”

Note that you’ve said nothing whatsoever negative about the competitor.  Quite the contrary; you’ve actually praised them as being “big” and “established.”  But you’ve also planted the seed that there’s something “wrong” that warrants the prospect’s attention… before buying from that competitor.

Conversely, suppose you’re a big company selling against a smaller competitor.  Your strength is your deep pockets, while the competitor is running out of venture capital.  You could say: “Those small potatoes are gonna run out of money.”  You could, that is, if you wanted to sound like a big bully and a tattletale.  Instead, you say something like:

  • You: “Just so I can be sure to provide value, who else are you talking to about this opportunity?”
  • Prospect: “We’ve had a meeting with MicroCorp LLC.”
  • You: “I heard some good things about their product.  Just out of curiosity, how does your company protect itself against risk when purchasing mission critical products?”

Once again, you’ve said nothing whatsoever negative about the other firm and have even provided a modicum of praise.  But the juxtaposition of the question planted a seed that going with that competitor could be risky.  And you’ve probably begun a conversation that allows you to talk about the stability and security of your own firm.

Needless to say, the more you know about your competitor, the better you’ll be able to craft questions that cut into the competitor’s value proposition.  And you must be able to deliver these questions in a matter-of-fact manner, without arching an eyebrow.

Once you’ve planted a seed, then you fertilize it by adding weight to the area where your offering is more competitive.  For example, if buying from you entails less risk than buying from the competitor, you work with the customer to quantify the risk, so that the customer understands the full awful consequences if a vendor doesn’t or can’t deliver as promised.

READERS: What’s been your experience in situations like this?   I know that some sales reps shy away from this kind of thing, but I suspect it’s because they’re afraid it will backfire.  Your thoughts are welcome!

The above is based on a conversation with Linda Richardson, founder of Richardson and author of Perfect Selling.

This Blog's Best Post: The Ultimate Cold Calling Tool

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    slackcloud

    10/29/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    This something as golden saying, understood more after read this post, thanks!

  •  
    2

    TeeOh

    10/30/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    Nice.
    We have a print shop in Lagos, Nigeria, which cannot compete on pricing with the more established ones. But, our quality orientation stands out.
    We have told ourselves that we must constantly admit that we cannot match our competitors' price, and give reasons why we cannot. But, we always show off our quality products which we le it be known cannot be gotten elsewhere.
    And it has always worked for us: our satisfied customers not only come back, they tell others.

  •  
    3

    peterabutters

    10/30/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    Knowing your competition is of course vitally important, but the key issue about negative comments is a gray area. Be negative when you can document your case. At that point slap the facts on the table and dance on your competitors coffin!

  •  
    4

    peterabutters

    10/30/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    In reply to TeeOh, get some samples of your competitors shoddy work, put them in your general presentation and show them proudly to the prospect, as evidence that you are better!
    You have a strategic advantage, make the most of it. Just remember that not everyone wants to buy a BMW series 7

  •  
    5

    Msendoo

    10/30/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    I appreciate your contribution and certainly believe that such critical thinking ensures to bring out the difference between two seem-alikes. And I think, not only in the for-profit sector should these ideas be taken seriously, but also in the non-profit sector. I cross bridges between for-profit and non-profit. I realze that the non-profit sector in Nigeria (where I live and work) is yet to begin critically enough about the comparative quality of the products and services that they sell. Thanks again for your contribution.

  •  
    6

    Geoffrey James, Sales Machine

    10/30/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    Re Note 5:
    First, it's always great to hear from sales pros in Africa. As the father of two children (and a sister-in-law) who were born there, my family has multiple connections there. I believe that Africa is the sleeping giant of the world economy.

    As for the competitive situation with printing, there is nothing wrong with showing a side-by-side comparison. However, you shouldn't "run down" the competition. Instead, present their sample as a SERVICE to your prospect. Say something like:

    "If you're more concerned with price than quality, I recommend XYZ. They do an adequate job. If you want world-class quality that can compete with materials printed in Europe or America, here's what we can do."

    Then show them your stuff. What's important here is to help the prospect assign a financial value to the higher quality that you provide.

    If you can show them quantitatively that higher quality printing will increase their revenue by a specific amount (based on some kind of research study) that's much larger than the difference in price between you and the competition... you've got the sale, my friend!

  •  
    7

    amiller@...

    10/30/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    Another strategy is to create a new factor for them to consider and give it a metaphoric name. Suppose your advantage is service, you might ask, "How are you going to handle the 'velcro' factor?" They will say, "What's that?" You reply, "You know how velcro sticks to itself?" "Yes." "You want clients to stick to you for your products as well and that requires exceptional service. How will you ensure you get that from the firms you are considering?" That causes them to re-think who they will use. Anne Miller, author Metaphorically Selling, www.annemiller.com

  •  
    8

    Mark Allen Roberts

    10/30/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    Great Points,

    "my competition sucks" selling does not work as I discuss in my blog http://nosmokeandmirrors.wordpress.com/2009/07/14/our-competition-sucks-selling-one-of-the-signs-of-a-market-loser-versus-a-market-leader/ and ultimately damages your brand.

    Mark Allen Roberts
    www.outbsolutions.com

  •  
    9

    mspratt

    10/31/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    I'm American working in Europe (France) and on occasions I'll recommend clients to competitors. The clients were real time waster, going nowhere negotiations, asking a lot and not wanting to pay for it, in short a real ?pain-in-the-A?. By recommending the client to a competitor (ie. ?they are better adapted to your needs?, etc.) I freed up my time and stuck my competitor with a real fardeau that slowed them up and consumed their resources.

    mspratt

  •  
    10

    Geoffrey James, Sales Machine

    10/31/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    Re Note 9:
    Hilarious!

  •  
    11

    peterabutters

    10/31/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    There's nothing new under the sun! I reccomend to mspratt that "The Right Way to Manage Unprofitable Customers
    Key ideas from the Harvard Business Review article by Vikas Mittal, Matthew Sarkees, and Feisal Murshed" be read. It has in fact already been presented on this site. (http://www.bnet.com/2439-13502_23-197382.html)

    A slightly more "refined" and less "nuclear diplomacy" approach to the issue

  •  
    12

    Ian Brodie

    10/31/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    Maybe it's me, but the language in the examples you use doesn't come across as saying "nothing whatsoever negative about the other firm".

    To me it comes across as a rather sneaky insult rather than graceful.

    The implications in "Just out of curiosity, how does your company protect itself against risk when purchasing mission critical products?" or "Have you talked to some of their customers about their service practices?? after they've just told you which competitors they're dealing with are about as subtle as Benny Hill.

    I could be wrong. I've never used those kinds of phrasings myself so I have no direct comparison of their impact vs the way I do things.

    But personally when I imagine myself using these phrases I feel like Randall, the sneaky snitch in Recess (yep, I spent too much time trying to work while my kids watch awful cartoons on the Disney channel). Or a gossipy teenage girl dropping less than subtle hints about who's sleeping with who.

    I prefer either to be straight: to praise the competitor where praise is due, but to highlight their weaknesses without resorting to sneaky implications. I don't think an honest, but direct approach causes problems - especially if you have a pre-established relationship with the client.

    Or I use Neil Rackham's recommendation of criticising the class of competitor rather than the individual. For example: "They're great, but the broblem with large companies is that small clients are low priority for them and they don't staff their best team. With us, you'll...."

    Now I know that last one is propbably just as sneaky as the examples you give. But for me it doesn't feel like it. The wording feels more elegant to me.

    Horses for courses I guess. The main thing is not to shy away from a comparison when needed - however you phrase it.

    Ian

  •  
    13

    subramax

    11/05/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    Torpedoing a competitor is not the morally right thing to do.
    No matter how gracefully it is done it is still putting down the
    other party.

    I work in a hospital environment, and it is unethical to talk
    negatively about another medical establishment. What we do
    is explain the strengths of our service. If the customer wants
    to know how it is different from 'the other' service, we tell
    them what we are good at. If the customer tells that the
    other hospital is doing things in a certain way, we tell them
    what we would do and why, and why we are not doing it the
    other way. etc. ..you get the picture I think.

    From my experience, talking bad about others always works
    negatively somewhere along the line. I never purchase a
    product from anyone who talks bad about others. The
    medical reps who come to see me understand that quite well;
    they were made to, very bluntly!

  •  
    14

    peterabutters

    11/06/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    No wonder the economy is in a mess! Where have all the sales people gone? And the marketeers all seem to have forgotten the basics. What a bunch of sponges!
    Isn't the basic idea of having a sales person supposed to be to show not the "added value" of his product but the "additional value" of his porduct compared to the competition and so clinch a deal before walking away?
    We all seem to be getting lost in so much theory that in the end sales will be handled using politically correct phrases and managed by committees of consultants.
    Every single time you demonstrate your "additional value" to th ecustomer you are implicity criticising your competetion. If this is indeed the case, be up front about it. Document every single statement you intend to make then go and get the business. If you can document your negatives you will convert the customer and form a long-term relationship based on trust - because you were able to back up your statements and demonstrate through your superior product that you were indeed superior. Since the objective in today's world is to form long term relationships which permit dialogue it is useless to base the dialogue on half-empty phrases which your customer will be forced to interpret, wasting his time and rating the sales person as a rambler.

    Now, come on, hit me, I want to start a fight, or at least a good argunment!
    I live by the above creed and teach th esame. Yes, I practise what I preach and preach what I practise. And I live such a comfortable life that I even have time to read this blogs!

  •  
    15

    Ian Brodie

    11/07/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    Peter - I don't disagree with you much. I believe in straight talking. I don't go out of my way to stress the negative points of a competitor if not asked - but if asked I don't like to use weasel words.

    With regards to subramax's comment I couldn't disagree more. There's nothing wrong morally with torpedoing a competitor.

    The overriding moral is to help the customer make the right choice. If, for example, you knew that the hospital down the road had a very low success rate at certain operations, or had just had an outbreak of MRSA - isn't it your moral duty to ensure the perosn you're talking to has all these facts so they can make a proper judgement? Otherwise they could end up endangering their own life.

    And regarding your treatment of pharma reps - there's a world of difference between talking bad about someone and presenting the facts to show what they're good or not good at.

    In fact, the way the medical world is going is the opposite. Doctors are demanding that pharma companies show the results of head-to-head tests of their products vs their competitors so they can make informed decisions about which product to use when.

    Ian

  •  
    16

    subramax

    11/08/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    Ha Ha. Sorry. No fights.

    I admit Ian, you guys are probably right from the
    salespersons point of view. I don't know, but that's probably
    why sales succeed in the West; and why businesses do so
    well over there. I am Eastern.

    About the MRSA etc. Well, that comes under medical ethics.
    Different topic altogether.

  •  
    17

    peterabutters

    11/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Gracefully Torpedo a Competitor

    Subramax: Have you considered the issue from the point of view of the company or the non-profit point of view? The obbligation of the corporation is to provide the maximum return on investment to the shareholder. It is therefore the function of the salesperson to maximise the sales for the corporation, within ethical limitis (add moral to that). The obbligation of the non-profit organisation is to maximise the amount of goods or services provided to its' beneficiaries. Any "profit" arising can be ploughed back as investment.

    Under both of these concepts it is the obbligation of the salespeople to promote the advantages of their organisation and there is nothing that says that this cannot be done through comparison, providing that no statements are misleading and all statements can be documented.
    I have just flipped once more through the AMA Journal of ethics (http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/) and there is nothing in there about comparison, as long as the "misleading" and "documented" is covered. So why is it a separate issue.
    Sadly, even in the World of medicine today, hospitals are funded either direct from patient admissions (private sector) or through patients treated (public sector) and so to grow or to continue to exist and serve the community should signify doing everything morally and ethically and legally correct to maximise the number of patients.

    Personally, I would isten very carefully to any sales person who makes documented comparisons, because at the end of the day he is trying to demonstrate his "additional value". If I decide that this value is not significant to me then I can choose to stay with my current supplier, but by listening I have at least opened my mind to new horizons and taken an opportunity to provide my organisation with a better good or service.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Geoffrey James Geoffrey James has sold and written hundreds of features, articles and columns for national publications including Wired, Men's Health, Business 2.0, SellingPower, Brand World, Computer Gaming World, CIO, The New York Times and (of course) BNET. He is the author of seven books, including Business Wisdom of the Electronic Elite (translated into seven languages and selected by four book clubs), and The Tao of Programming (widely quoted on the Web as a "canonical book of... more »

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here