BNET Insight

Sales Machine

A, Always. B, Be. C, Closing.

Market Share is Bunk. Fuggedaboudit!

July 9th, 2008 @ 4:20 am

4 Comments

Categories: Management, Marketing, Sales Process, Watercooler

Tags: PC, Market Share, Unit Volume Sale, Sales Strategy, Marketing Research, Sales Force Management, Sales, Marketing, Geoffrey James

Running away from market shareA reader writes:

I work for an insurance firm, managing their International Medical Health marketing arm. Our target market consists of high-net worth individuals and top-notch companies. My core responsibility is to market the service and increase our market share. Although we’ve not done badly, we’ve not yet made our quota. I’m wondering if you could give me a few tips on how to turn things around.

Sure. The reason you aren’t making your sales numbers is that you’re focusing on “market share” rather than helping the sales staff to sell. Let me explain.

Market share is an abstract concept that has no real meaning in the real world. Take, for example, the PC market. Every quarter, the big market research firms issue reports about which PC manufacturer is selling the most PCs. However, while HP may sell more numbers of PCs than Dell in a quarter (or vice versa), that’s not particularly meaningful, because:

  • Markets are infinitely segmentable. Within the traditional PC market, you can find numerous segments and sub-segments. The PC market separates into desktops and laptops. Desktops break up into business machines, home machine and gaming machines. Laptops break into desktop replacement, mobile computers, and sub-portables. Gaming machines (like Alienware) compete in a certain sense with gaming consoles (like the xBox 360). Similarly, sub-portables compete with high-end smartphones. Where do you draw the line? It’s completely arbitrary.
  • Unit volume sales are irrelevant compared to profitability. The reason that people think “market share” is important is the industrial age notion that if you make more widgets, you can make them at a lower cost and therefore make more money. That’s not even 20th century thinking; it’s 19th century thinking. For example, the company that makes the profit on each PC sold is (gasp!) Panasonic, a company whose unit counts are so tiny that they never show up in any market share lists.

Why do companies focus on market share? Simple. Marketing groups want to avoid being measured on something that’s actually relevant to the business, like the lead conversion rate. By setting up “market share” as a malleable report card, they give themselves the license to trot out imaginary market segmentations that show how the company is “winning” — even if sales is struggling and the company is losing money.

In the worst cases, the marketing groups bribe second tier market research firms to come up with bogus segmentation reports in order to “prove” that their marketing efforts have been successful. I have seen this happen with my own eyes.

In short, market share is a minimally useful concept. Most of the time it’s pure marketing bunkum and unworthy of serious attention.

Defining your job as “increasing market share” is putting your mental energies into a largely meaningless context, particularly in a business like high-end insurance, where every product is customized for each customer. Seriously, what does “market share” mean in this context? Nothing. And that’s why your marketing efforts fall flat.

You need to focus your marketing efforts ENTIRELY on lead generation and sales training. Your marketing goals should be identify sales leads that are highly likely to convert, and to have a sales staff capable of taking those leads and converting them from suspect to prospect to customer.

Every second that you waste thinking about markets share is just adding to your cost of sales, without adding any value.

This Blog's Best Post: The Ultimate Cold Calling Tool

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Melpo

    07/10/08 | Report as spam

    Marketing Goals Set at C-Level

    I think you're on to something here. I see a lot of market share goals set by someone else higher in the organization. Usually this goal is set by someone who doesn't understand the meaningful numbers like conversion rates. You can't necessarily blame them. After all, C-level execs are paid to think big.

    Somehow marketers have to find a way to connect the C-level executives to the metrics that really matter. I think the first step to doing that is to make sure that you have a firm grasp on them yourself.

  •  
    2

    Emp Rx

    07/10/08 | Report as spam

    Hitting the nail on its head

    Goeffrey, once again you have identified the lifeblood of business - Sales. However, the goal must be to produce profitable sales. Hopefully, enough to support the future growth of your organization.

    Nothing produces a sale better than a qualified lead, not quotas, targets, or even training sessions. The primary focus should be teaching your sales team to identify and qualify a prospect. That is the key to successful sales management.

    A wise man once said "If you throw someone a fish, you'll feed them for a day. If you teach them to fish, they can eat forever."

  •  
    3

    alankaplan

    07/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Market Share is Bunk. Fuggedaboudit!

    The article contains some truth but is too simplistic. Market share by segment is surely an important issue as far as benchmarking is concerned and whilst profit is important, what is really important is the relationship between profit and volumes which is the keystone of mass marketing i.e. smaller profits but enormous volumes. Alan K, Australia

  •  
    4

    Geoffrey James, Sales Machine

    07/10/08 | Report as spam

    Meaningless goals

    Why bother to benchmark against a meaningless concept?

    What does it matter if Dell sells 20 times as many PCs as Panasonic, if Panasonic is making 20 times the margin on each unit and the ROI on Panasonic's PC business is through the roof.

    The main problem with market share it that it encourages marketing folk to think of their offerings as fungible commodities, which leads to price wars and lower margins. The PC business struggles like crazy with tiny margins because their products are undifferentiated -- a natural outcome of measuring themselves in terms of market share.

    Rather than trying to compete for an abstract "market share," marketing in B2B should focus on lead generation and conversion rate. And the company should focus on becoming a strategic vendor, not a commodity.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Geoffrey James Geoffrey James has sold and written hundreds of features, articles and columns for national publications including Wired, Men's Health, Business 2.0, SellingPower, Brand World, Computer Gaming World, CIO, The New York Times and (of course) BNET. He is the author of seven books, including Business Wisdom of the Electronic Elite (translated into seven languages and selected by four book clubs), and The Tao of Programming (widely quoted on the Web as a "canonical book of... more »

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here