BNET Insight

Sales Machine

A, Always. B, Be. C, Closing.

The Customer-Focused Sales Process

March 5th, 2008 @ 7:33 am

1 Comment

Categories: Cold Calls, General, Sales Process, Sales Technology, Sales Tips

Tags: Sales Representative, Sales Process, Rep, Sales Strategy, Sales Force Management, Sales, Geoffrey James

Happy CustomerMost sales processes are vendor-focused. They define what the sales rep is supposed to do in order to move the sale process forward. (For an example of this see my previous post “Is Your Sales Process Obsolete?“) As such, they try to shoehorn customer behavior to the wishful thinking of sales management.

Sales process guru Michael Bosworth believes that such “vendor-focused” sales processes cause problems, confusion and delay. He believes that sales processes should be built around the stages of decision-making that take place within the customer organization.

If I understand him rightly, the ideal sales process might looks something like this:

  1. SUSPECT. A target individual has become curious (via your demand creation efforts) how you have helped a similar firm use your offering to achieve a goal or solve a problem. The rep’s response: a “warm” call to that customer.
  2. PROSPECT. The target individual has shared a goal with or admitted a problem to the sales rep. The rep’s response: a proposed solution to the problem.
  3. CHAMPION. The target individual has visualized how the sales reps offering can help him achieve a goal or solve a problem and has agreed to give the rep access to key players needed to get the offering sold, funded and implemented. The rep’s response: meetings with key players.
  4. OPPORTUNITY. The target, along will all key players, has agreed as a group to evaluate your offering, after having collaborated with your rep on a written sequence of events with multiple go/no go checkpoints. Response: move the sale through the go/no checkpoints.
  5. CUSTOMER. The target’s firm has agreed in writing to purchase the offering.

What I like about this structure is that it keeps the sales process tied to the customer’s decision-making process, with the sales rep as the master facilitator rather than the master manipulator.

Anybody want to weigh in on whether this is a good idea or not. Our (unscientific) poll in my earlier post (”Is Sales Process Worth It?“) suggests that most companies don’t have much of sales process in any case.

Would a process structured around the decision-making of the buyer make sales process more useful and hence more popular?

This Blog's Best Post: The Ultimate Cold Calling Tool

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    michaelperla@...

    03/09/08 | Report as spam

    Makes Sense

    Yes. A customer-centric sales process that is linked to the customer's buying process makes sense most of the time. The sales professional can shape the buying process, especially if the customer is new to buying the offering or there are a lot of decision points within the process. Utlimately, the recurring thread or principle in most of businesss is that if you help the customer to reach/exceed their business objectives (could be personal and professional objectives), good things happen - sales are made, profit is thrown off, and customers stay loyal. It's also known as the law of indirect effect.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Geoffrey James Geoffrey James has sold and written hundreds of features, articles and columns for national publications including Wired, Men's Health, Business 2.0, SellingPower, Brand World, Computer Gaming World, CIO, The New York Times and (of course) BNET. He is the author of seven books, including Business Wisdom of the Electronic Elite (translated into seven languages and selected by four book clubs), and The Tao of Programming (widely quoted on the Web as a "canonical book of... more »

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here