BNET Insight

Sales Machine

A, Always. B, Be. C, Closing.

The Perfect Sales Process?

January 8th, 2008 @ 5:24 am

7 Comments

Categories: Blogroll, Cold Calls, General, Pitches, Sales Tips

Tags: Customer, Sales Process, Sales Strategy, Sales Force Management, Sales, Geoffrey James

Customer-Focused Sales Process Model

Your sales process is probably broken. Here’s how to fix it.

Any sales process creates a structure that helps track the progress of the sale. However, most sales processes also encourage dysfunctional sales behavior. I’ve recently stumbled across a sales process model that pretty much fixes that problem, but before going into details, let’s look at what’s wrong with your typical sales processes.

As I explained in my post way back in March, “Is Your Sales Process Obsolete,” the typical sales process looks something like this:

  • Step #1. Engage customer.
  • Step #2. Investigate needs.
  • Step #3. Present a product.
  • Step #4. Demonstrate the product.
  • Step #5. Propose a purchase.
  • Step #6. Negotiate terms.
  • Step #7. Answer objections.
  • Step #8. Close the deal.

The main problem that traditional process model is that it defines a set of actions that the sales rep is supposed to take. It assumes that the customer will meet with you, will share information with you, will watch a presentation or a demonstration, and that all those activities will convince the customer to buy. But customers don’t think that way and may have a very different process by which they decide to buy something.

Ideally, you want your sales process to match the customer’s buying process. The problem is that every customer is different when it comes to stakeholders,politics, etc. If you took the “match the customer buying process” concept to its logical extreme, you’d end up rewriting your sales process for every customer. That’s why it’s easier to stick with the traditional “vendor-focused” process — even though it’s not really helping.

I recently had a conversation Duane Sparks and Tim Murray, the two leaders of the sales training firm The Sales Board. They may have come up with the skeleton of a sales process model that matches — in a generic sense — the way that every customer makes buying decisions, regardless of the specific details. They’ve observed that customer buying decisions always take place in five predictable stages:

  1. Do I want to do business with this particular sales professional?
  2. Do I want to do business with the firm this sales professional represents?
  3. Do I want and need the products and services this sales professional is offering?
  4. Does the price and value of those products and services meet my expectations?
  5. Is this the right time to make a decision to buy those products and service?

Note that each stage represents a customer decision that leads eventually towards the decision to buy. Furthermore, each step builds on the previous step. If that generic customer buying model is accurate (and I think it is), then the ideal sales process should be structured into those five stages.

What’s going to be different (meaning unique to your firm and to individual customers) are the specific activities that your sales reps must do to guide each customer to make the five “sub-decisions” that will result in the big decision of actually buying… from you.

Figuring out that part of your “perfect” sales process is going to take observation and research into what’s really working out in the field. But if all those activities are structured around those five decisions — in that order — you’re more likely to close business than with a sales process based upon wishful thinking about how customers ought to buy.

This Blog's Best Post: The Ultimate Cold Calling Tool

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    bitfarmer

    01/09/08 | Report as spam

    Buying Process

    The individual stages within this buying process make sense, yet from my experience the order/sequence is not static.

    The sequence outlined works when the sales person already has a longer term relationship with buyers within the prospect organization.

    In most new client scenerios, the prospect has researched the product category and may have a budget, so stage 3 is completed before stage 2 and stage 1. Depending upon the level of prospect doing the research work, stage 2 may even be completed, or at least shortlisted prior to stage 1 when the sales person has the opportunity to engage the buyer.

    Overall, this does provide a good framework for sales and marketing to create materials and Q&A dialog around answers to each of these questions which playing up the differences and benefits of their specific offering.

  •  
    2

    Geoffrey James, Sales Machine

    01/10/08 | Report as spam

    Order of decisions

    I agree that the decision-making often goes out of sequence. However, if the decisions aren't made in sequence, the sale becomes more difficult. For example, the fact that your customers have already done their product research puts the deal into competitive play. It would be better -- in the sense that you'd close faster and with less hassle -- if you could figure out a way to get into their account and establish credibility prior to that process.

  •  
    3

    startup sales mentor

    06/25/08 | Report as spam

    RE: The Perfect Sales Process?

    Simple yet so hard to explain. Everyday I find myself evangelizing the concept of aligning to the buying process. For some reason people liken this to the purchasing process.

    In my opinion and what I share with others is that aligning with a buying process is similar in every circumstance.

    1. Determine if there is a difference your offering makes.
    2. Determine if you want the prospect as a customer.
    3. Determine what is important to them, i.e. their perspective.
    4. Learn their timeline and what is controlling it.
    5. Show them a better way to achieve their business objectives.

    The intangible in all of this is trust. If you get someone to like you, then like what you have to say (usually it is because they have done most of the critical talking), what comes next s trust. Trust is the start of something beautiful.

    http://salesblog.karlgoldfield.com

  •  
    4

    Ian Brodie

    04/21/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The Perfect Sales Process?

    Geoffrey -

    While I fully agree with the need to align your sales process with your clients buying process - the specific process Sparks & Murray outline is not one that works well for a lot of my clients.

    The process outlined seems more like on geared to regular purchases - for example stationary or travel or mechanical supplies. You establish a relationship with a good inddividual & firm first, then look at specific product requirements.

    But very many times the process isn't like that at all. The buying process is triggered by an event - awareness of a problem or need, dissatisfaction with an incumbent supplier, etc.

    In those cases the buyer looks to firm up their own ideas about what they need first - they they go looking for solutions. And usually they look for the solution first - not the salesperson or firm that provides it.

    You make a good point when you say it would be better to get into the account and establish credibility first. But that's not linked to the buying process in this case. The client isn't thinking "do I want to do business with this professional?" If you try to work on this question you'll put them off by focusing to early on doing business.

    At this early stage, the client is really thinking "Do I want to keep listening/talking to this person?". The keep to building credibility is to answer this question by adding value to the potential client.

    It's only later when a real need emerges that you should focus on the "do I want to do business with them?" question.

    Ian
    http://www.lighthousebc.co.uk

  •  
    5

    Geoffrey James, Sales Machine

    04/21/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The Perfect Sales Process?

    Ian,
    You make an interesting point. There's a tendency to cram every sales opportunity into one model. I do think that if you're more focused on customer buying patterns you'll come up with a more flexible process than if you focus on the way you'd like to sell, which is how most sales processes are defined.

  •  
    6

    Ian Brodie

    10/24/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The Perfect Sales Process?

    An update on my comment on this: having now read the action selling books I can see how the model fits into some of the sales scenarios I see a bit better than I'd originally thought.

    On an individual sales call for example, the potential buyer has to see the salesperson as worth listening to before they'll open up and talk about their needs.

    The books have an unfortunate habit of saying that all sales go through exactly these 7 steps in exactly that order. The world's not that simple. But having read more, I do think it's a better and more flexible model than I thought.

    Ian

  •  
    7

    Financeservices@...

    11/20/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The Perfect Sales Process?

    Can anyone outline a good sales process for selling financial products ie life assurance etc

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Geoffrey James Geoffrey James has sold and written hundreds of features, articles and columns for national publications including Wired, Men's Health, Business 2.0, SellingPower, Brand World, Computer Gaming World, CIO, The New York Times and (of course) BNET. He is the author of seven books, including Business Wisdom of the Electronic Elite (translated into seven languages and selected by four book clubs), and The Tao of Programming (widely quoted on the Web as a "canonical book of... more »

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here