BNET Insight

Sales Machine

A, Always. B, Be. C, Closing.

Solution Selling is Dead.

October 29th, 2007 @ 5:30 am

10 Comments

Categories: Blogroll, General, Pitches, Sales Tips

Tags: Solution, Sales, Mike Bosworth, Business World, B2B Customer, Geoffrey James

Mike Bosworth is probably the smartest guy I ever met in the sales training world. His first book, Solution Selling: Creating Buyers in Difficult Selling Markets, was brilliant, and full of great advice. I highly recommend it.

That being said, I observe that very few companies actually follow the system that Mike lays out in that book. Instead, they simply trick out their “products” as “solutions” and pretend that they’re doing something different. (Note to top management: if you want the benefit of new ideas in a book, read more than just the title.)

The reason that “solution selling” is honored more in the breach than the observances lies, at least in part, with the word itself: “solution.” First of all, the term sets the wrong tone. A “solution” is supposed to solve a customer problem, right? That idea assumes that the business world is full of PROBLEMS waiting to be solved. Problems, problems, problems. What a negative and depressing worldview!

The successful people that I know — the real decision-makers — don’t tend to think that way. They tend to think of the business world in terms of possibility, opportunity and achievement. To these folk, the idea that business is a collection of “problems” is foreign, so if you’re talking “solutions” you’re not talking their language.

That’s why, half the time, when people talk about “solution selling” they tack the phrase “or achieve a goal” to the phrase “solve a problem.” But that always sounds lame. What has a “solution” got to do with achieving a goal? Nothing. Solutions solve problems. They don’t achieve goals.

But even if the word “solution” in English meant “something that solves a problem or achieves a goal” the concept of solution selling would still be stillborn because a “solution” is only a THING. The B2B customer doesn’t want a THING. The B2B customer wants RESULTS.

Ninety-nine times out of a hundred, “solution selling” consists of replace the word “product” with the word “solution” in the marketing materials.  Sometimes there’s also some half-hearted attempt to explain why specific product features relate to some customer problem. Often, what’s presented is a tautology like “our networking solution has ultra-fast bandwidth in order to solve the problem of not having enough bandwidth.” As generally presented to customers, a “solution” is a THING that has features and functions and benefits. A product wrapped in extra verbiage.

Last week, I wrote about Manager-to-Manager (M2M) selling — the kind of selling you need to do if you’re going to call high and make the big ticket sales. If you want to sell M2M, the first thing you need to scrap is the silly notion that you’re selling a “solution.” At that level, solutions are just background noise in the sales process. Details.

If you focus too much on your “solutions,” you’ll either lose the sale or fight an uphill battle. This isn’t to say that there aren’t plenty of lower-level functionaries who think of business almost solely in terms of problems. But they’re not the decision-makers. From the perspective of a real decision-maker, all products (even when relabeled as “solutions”) are basically the same.

You may think that customers should care that your “solution” has superior features. They don’t. Customers — decision-makers, that is — don’t have the time, energy or inclination to learn enough about your product category to understand why those features make your solution better.

Decision-makers want results and they want YOU to take responsibility for those results. In today’s crazed business world, the only reason that a real decision maker will talk to you about those results is that they want to outsource a function that your firm is hopefully capable of performing.  In fact, if your customer contact DOES appear to care about product feature/functions, and wants to get into a long discussion of “problems” and “solutions,” you’re not talking to a decision-maker; you’re talking to a speed-bump.

That’s why I say that solution selling is dead. More on this tomorrow.

This Blog's Best Post: The Ultimate Cold Calling Tool

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    JohnOnSales

    10/29/07 | Report as spam

    Only doing it correctly is dead

    Geoff, I agree that solution selling is improperly performed by most companies. Its an excellent tool for selling a customized "solution" because of the structure and type of questioning and commitment that comprise the system. While some of the nomenclature needs to be changed, the system itself is still sound, to the extent that it concentrates on finding and satisfying needs. xoxoxo johnonsales

  •  
    2

    Geoffrey James, Sales Machine

    10/29/07 | Report as spam

    Solution still off target

    You're still thinking that the customer wants a "solution." The customer doesn't want a "thing." The customer wants results. A "thing" might be a part of getting those results, but if you could deliver those results without selling a "thing" (like a new piece of software) the customer would be just as happy. As long as the customer is getting the desired result.

  •  
    3

    jfaver

    10/30/07 | Report as spam

    Suspense is killing me

    Geoff, PLEASE tell me you will address the alternative to selling a thing/solution soon (ie the proper way to describe the value you are selling.)Is it stories about customer success? Is it positioning a system as a "tool" or "means to an end result?" I agree with what you are saying and face the challenge of obliterating the word "solution" from the marketing collateral I help write every day.

  •  
    4

    Geoffrey James, Sales Machine

    10/30/07 | Report as spam

    Solution word in brochures

    I'll explain all about this in my 10/31/07 post.

  •  
    5

    rkear

    10/30/07 | Report as spam

    Misleading and Somewhat Misinformed

    Provocative headlines like ???Solution Selling Is Dead??? may stimulate interest and discussion, but are often based on a dated or limited understanding of the process, methods, and essence of the Solution Selling Methodology. The content of this post in no way represents the current practice of solution selling in many of the world???s leading companies.

    First, the practice of simply substituting the word ???solutions??? for ???products??? may be prevalent, but has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual application of Solution Selling fundamentals. Anyone who attempts to equate this practice with Solution Selling is either completely misinformed or simply trying to propagate an inaccurate view of the current methodology. This widespread practice is exposed in the 2006 sequel to The New Solution Selling (The Solution-Centric Organization, McGraw-Hill, 2006), as one of four types of ???pseudo-solutions??? that are often superficial attempts to disguise commodity products as higher value offerings.

    Second, of course customers want results (versus ???THINGS???) ??? but this semantic sleight-of-hand doesn???t invalidate useful terms like goals, problems and solutions and their role in meaningful customer dialogue. Implicit in almost every business challenge is something results-related - it is precisely the absence of (or opportunity for) these desired outcomes that exposes a ???problem,??? ???need??? or ???opportunity??? in the mind of the buyer. At last check, ???results??? (a noun) are a THING too ??? when customers don???t get the right ones, they sometimes conclude that they have a ???problem??? that requires some insight to solve.

    Credible ???results providers??? can???t just promise the desired outcomes ??? they are typically highly fluent in the causal factors related to desired outcomes. They earn credibility by thoroughly understanding the barriers (problems) to attaining the outcomes (results), and proven examples of how offerings (solutions) deliver the necessary capabilities to attain the desired results. How can the understanding of the customer???s functional environment (outlined in the prior post How to Sell Manager-to-Manager) not involve this type of business acumen?

    Third, the shallow tautology presented on solution positioning in this post is patently absurd. The Solution Messaging Methodology (companion marketing methodology) would never produce something this trite. In Solution Selling, the term ???solution??? is always directly and explicitly tied to some rational form of customer value, outcome, or result. Always. If some individuals completely mis-apply concepts and claim to sell solutions, it doesn???t invalidate the actual methods and techniques of legitimate practitioners.

    Finally, most of the concepts presented in the prior post (How to Sell Manager-to-Manager) are in large part parallel with multiple sub-methods in Solution Selling, and are strikingly similar to a concept referred to in the methodology as ???situational fluency.??? An integral sub-method of Solution Selling is focused extensively on the delivery of measurable value (results) to the customer.

    All due respect, but just because different terms and phrases are applied (largely semantic differences) to a very similar set of ideas doesn???t justify such a presumptuous headline ??? especially with such a shallow and limited depiction of what the current state of Solution Selling is actually about.

  •  
    6

    Geoffrey James, Sales Machine

    10/30/07 | Report as spam

    Solution as a terminology

    Gee, what can I say...

    The term "solution" has been misused so many times and miaapplied so many times that it's become a liability. Taken literally, it's only applicable to problems and taken broadly it's so fuzzy that it doesn't really mean much of anything at all.

    I feel sorry for all the sales trainers who have wedded their systems to the buzzword, but I think it's on the way out. It's something that happens, especially when the reality doesn't match the promise.

    Take SFA, for example. The buzzword got old and tired, so it had to be rechristened CRM. Now that's getting all tired and people are starting to use "Sales 2.0." And that too, will eventually go the way of all buzzwords.

    I think M2M selling encapsulates the required behavior better. It's not that it's that different than what solution selling was supposed to be. It's that the term "solution" -- with all its odd connotations -- drives the wrong behavior. And it's starting to sound, well, a bit quaint.

  •  
    7

    Bob Schmonsees

    11/16/07 | Report as spam

    It ain't about the word!

    While many people find the word solution a bit over worn, isn?t the real problem getting both marketing and sales people to effectively communicate their company?s value, and more importantly it?s differentiation from the customer's perspective, and in the context of their specific needs, problems, and goals? The best marketing & sales people have always intuitively done this.

    The other 90% are the crux of the problem, and this whole discussion about the word "solution" seems to me to be a smoke screen because most companies haven't cracked the code yet on how to get that 90% of marketing and sales people to think outside-in and institutionalize the customer?s point of view in the way they communicate their company?s value and differentiation. In their frustration attack the word ?solution? as the culprit, which of course, is a red herring.

    This is not rocket science, and whether you call it Solutions Selling, Customer Centric Selling or M2M Selling, it?s a fundamental transformation in the way we think, market, and sell. And, like any major change, it has to be built on a strong foundation, and that?s been the missing link. Unfortunately, most companies have failed to create a foundation that helps marketing and sales people think outside-in (customer perspective) as well as inside-out (product perspective).

    Every company has what I call a unique ?Value DNA?. It?s the collective wisdom of your best people about three things: How to frame the specific customer needs, problems, and goals you solve; how you solve them; and most importantly, how you solve them better than your competition. The problem is that most companies don't have a systematic value mapping process to document, institutionalize, and continually improve their Value DNA. So without this foundation process, there is no control over the raw materials knowledge that needs to be the foundation for the positioning and messaging strategy, the marketing communications deliverables, and the selling conversations. This is like building a car with no quality control over the steel.
    This is why some form of systematic value mapping process needs to be at the heart of any solution or customer centric strategy.

  •  
    8

    larry.edwards@...

    11/03/07 | Report as spam

    RE: Solution Selling is Dead.

    Iagree that if you are simply replacing the name of your product with solution...then solution selling is dead. However, if you are pressing the mark and being a professional and having M2M sales calls and dealing with the right level of contacts, your business acumen and connversation will outweigh specs and features and focus on what you can do for your customer and own it!

  •  
    9

    Geoffrey James, Sales Machine

    11/06/07 | Report as spam

    I hear you.

    ...it's not so much the word "solution" as the fact that the concept has been twisted into becoming a synonym for "product."

    It's always easier to play word games than to actually change behaviors.

  •  
    10

    robb.gomez@...

    11/12/07 | Report as spam

    Business Acumen

    Right on Larry! Business Acumen will provide the saleperson the ability to have a business discussion with a decision maker versus "look how great and wonderful my product/solution is". The ability to express value in terms of financial & strategic importance to the customer will be a trend that will contiune to grow. As a salesperson, if you can't create that link, then you better get some business acumen training or look for a different profession.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Geoffrey James Geoffrey James has sold and written hundreds of features, articles and columns for national publications including Wired, Men's Health, Business 2.0, SellingPower, Brand World, Computer Gaming World, CIO, The New York Times and (of course) BNET. He is the author of seven books, including Business Wisdom of the Electronic Elite (translated into seven languages and selected by four book clubs), and The Tao of Programming (widely quoted on the Web as a "canonical book of... more »

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement