BNET Insight

Catching Flack

Smart ways to win the public relations game

Increasing Your Odds of Getting Customers Publicly Reference-able

August 23rd, 2007 @ 11:22 am

2 Comments

Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: Customer, Travis Van

hiding.jpgYesterday I rattled off a few of the most common reasons why customers often refuse to participate in publicity opportunities (case studies, press releases, et al) on behalf of their vendors.

But as KristiF08 commented: “Those of us in industry marketing are pretty familiar with these reasons ‘why not.’ What I’d really like to know is how to influence my project managers and consultants to work with a client throughout an engagement to get the client to change their mind. Industry media aren’t interested in unnamed case studies. Can someone offer some tips as to how to influence the client relationship so they see the value in participating in a named case study/press release? I’ve yet to find them.”

One of the practices that’s really common out there, of course, is cutting sweetheart deals for customers who are willing to sing your praises. It seems like a sort of sleazy practice to give a customer the financial incentive to speak on your behalf (i.e., how truly genuine, therefore, is their testimonial?) … but that is a VERY common way that vendors entice their customers to talk. The trade bait might be a lower price on the service / product, or additional services beyond what’s being paid for, etc.

Another common way to entice customer participation is to appeal to the ego of someone who works there. I’ve primarily done PR in high tech, and it’s quite common to find an enterprise architect or similar who is interested in making a name for his/herself. The IT infrastructure is core to the customer’s business, and here’s a person who wants to be viewed at the cutting edge of technology (and continuously ushering in new approaches that increase their company’s competitive advantage). If you can get this type of individual in front of industry press, it gives them further access to personal recognition. If people feel like you’re asking them to whore out your product, that’s not terribly enticing. But if people feel like you’re giving them a platform (i.e., media opportunities) to discuss their roadmap or vision, they become much more receptive to participation (and your product invariably gets that positive endorsement you were looking for anyway).

As far as more specifically getting buy-in on case studies / press releases, one huge advantage that I’ve discovered is writing them BEFORE asking for permission. When you ask for permission at the onset, the customer’s imagination runs wild and their guard goes up. They envision this really painful series of events around helping create this collateral, getting it approved, etc. But if you take the initiative from day one to capture the content and chronicle the customer’s experiences / benefits of using your product or service, and then present a draft write up to them for review — it becomes much easier to get buy-in. Make it very clear to them that you won’t publish anything without their express consent, and that you will strike anything they feel uncomfortable with. Taking that initiative to create the collateral and THEN show it to them somehow gets you past a lot of the typical reservations that they might have had. And (it might be sort of manipulative), but they typically recognize the work that went into it and somehow feel a little more compelling to just go along with it.

The style of the writing in the case study / press release can also be a huge factor in whether the customer ultimately goes along. Often what I see are these super breathless / exuberant types of write-ups (by the vendor) where they’ve got the customer giving excessive praise to the product. You’re much better off being relatively objective and subtle (and portraying the usage / adoption in an honest light). Sometimes the rhetoric can be so over the top that the thought of having their name associated with it really turns off the customer.

And there’s something very reassuring to customers about knowing where the content will ultimately end up. It’s good to point out similar case studies that have been done by your company (to show them that you can be trusted to pull it off in good taste, and that others have gone through your case study gauntlet and still have all their limbs intact).

Btw: Jennifer Alsever wrote a great piece on “How to Get Your Customers to Solve Problems for You” for BNET recently. I think the third section of that article (”Make Engaged Customers Feel Special”) has some points that are really material to this challenge of getting customers reference-able.

Image from Tiggywinkle’s photostream on flickr creative commons.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    KristiF08

    08/23/07 | Report as spam

    And the answer is ...

    Wow! I never expected to get such a quick and detailed blog response. Thanks for taking the time to read my comments and respond. I like the idea of "do first, ask later". It sort of fits the "it's easier to ask forgiveness than permission" strategy that I sometimes apply in my life. I'll have to see if that works. Thanks again.

  •  
    2

    jtodor@...

    08/24/07 | Report as spam

    Refocus the Effort

    These solicited case studies and press releases are simply not credible with prospective customers and therefore do little to advance the welfare of the vendor.

    In contrast, customer-generated content and peer reviews are not only credible and trusted by other customers, they seek them out. There is going evidence that this is true in both the B-to-C and B-to-B environments.

    Why is this the case? Customer trust and believe each other when they talk about the experience they have had with the product?the experience using it to address business challenges and to gain competitive differentiation. The vendor company only comes into play if they facilitated a positive experience.

    Companies that support open customer dialogs signal a genuine interest in a win-win agenda and accrue relationship value. As relationship value builds, customer become more co-operative, open and even collaborative. The caveat is, a company can set-up and manage a forum or social media site, but they can't censor it.

    A number of companies have jump-started their sites by first sponsoring regional customer advisory meeting. They hire a third party to facilitate customer discussions around challenges, obstacles and solutions. These discussions are them published on their site and other customers are invited to join-in.

    Most often what surfaces is a dose of reality tempered by a lot of proactive "the glass is half-full" thinking. Most business leaders are solution-seeker, not nay-sayers.

    John I. Todor, Ph.D., author of Addicted Customers: How to Get Them Hooked on Your Company.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
Top Rated
    advertisement
    • Click Here
    • Click Here
    • Click Here
    advertisement
    Click Here