BNET Insight

Catching Flack

Smart ways to win the public relations game

What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

October 28th, 2008 @ 4:30 am

Categories: Marketing, Public Relations, Spin

Tags: Consumer, Public Relations, Energy Efficiency, Shelton Group, Transportation, Jon Greer

Here’s a quiz: which of the following environmental terms resonates most strongly with consumers:

a ) Conservation

b) Green

c) Energy Efficiency

d) Sustainable

If you answered “b) Green” — you’re wrong! The answer is c) Energy Efficiency. That’s according to Suzanne Shelton of Shelton Group, who conducts annual surveys of consumer attitudes toward environmental issues. Shelton’s research indicates that only 61.5% of consumers have a positive association with the word “green,” 63.5 percent feel positively about “sustainable,” 74% feel positively about “conservation” and a whopping 88.2% feel positively about “energy efficiency.”

Why? Because it’s a term they can understand. “Energy efficiency” means turning off the lights, lowering the thermostat, buying a hybrid car, and so on — things consumers can actually do. But what does “green” mean? It can be all things to all people, Shelton says, and consumers already see through the hype — that “green” is mostly a marketing buzzword designed to boost sales.

Other excellent tidbits from Shelton’s top-rate presentation at the PRSA International Conference in Detroit:

  • Consumers are “armchair environmentalists” — they can see lots of things other people should do, but don’t want to do much themselves, unless it’s easy and saves them money
  • People don’t know what the right things to do are — there’s an unmet need for a credible third-party to certify products and services that are good for the environment
  • Consumers currently associate “energy efficient” and “green” with “more expensive”
  • The economy is definitely having an effect: in 2007, consumers said that the first thing they would do if they had an extra $10,000 to put into their homes would be to replace flooring and countertops; in 2008, it was replace windows and upgrade their heating and cooling systems to save energy
  • Most consumers know enough about sustainability and environmentally friendly products and services to “get through a cocktail party,” but that’s about all

And here’s the kicker of kickers: do you know what is the largest source of greenhouse gases? It’s not personal cars and trucks or even all of the transportation sector — it’s coal-burning electricity generation. That’s right — the whole push to do things virtually and plugging in is actually worse for the environment, as a whole, than getting in our cars or taking an airplane.

Did you know that Jon Greer is available to speak to your company or PR agency about PR and media relations? Contact Jon for more information!

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    caddit

    10/28/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    Slashdot ran a similar item where they concluded IT specialists are much more concerned about orange(security) than green(environment). Makes sense.

  •  
    2

    dyun

    10/28/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    I think it is really strange that you write "[t]hat???s right ??? the whole push to do things virtually and plugging in is actually worse for the environment, as a whole, than getting in our cars or taking an airplane."

    We can more easily control where our energy comes from then replacing a whole world's fleet of cars and airplanes. That is what clean energy technologies are all about. For example in California, we have a ballot measure that would mandate that 50% of our energy come from renewable technologies. Not everyone is using coal and its clear that we are inevitably going to move towards cleaner if not 0% emission technologies.

    yes, I agree the "green" movement in marketing has gone way overboard and it doesn't really mean anything anymore. I just think it is irresponsible to proliferate ideas that make any kind of energy waste OK in the same breath as criticizing a marketing trend.

  •  
    3

    paultroberts

    10/28/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    If that's true, why do you have a GREEN LOGO?

  •  
    4

    GreenManEducates

    10/28/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    not sure about your article.
    I just started a website recently that is targeted as schools and kids to do something for the environment.
    www.greenupthegardenstate.com
    we have gotten a great response and a term is needed to initiate the environmentalist reaction to a new generation. Green is that term.

  •  
    5

    detanrep

    10/28/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    It's true that the environmental term "Green" has become a catch-all, overused and often politically abused term that has blurry meaning to consumers. Sustainability and "Carbon-footprint", although less used fall into the same catagory but to a lesser degree.
    It's easy to understand why consumers are unsure and confused as they hear "experts" bandy these terms about. Ususlly the "experts" speaking loudest are selling something. Also to help confuse consumers there is often conflicting scientific data backing up different points of view. A good example is the general belief that anything paper is evironmentally better than anything plastic which is not always the case.

  •  
    6

    ndlicht1

    10/28/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    Its about time somebody pointed out that this term has virtually no meaning at all unless you are referring to the color of money in the US.

    Business speak again strikes out

  •  
    7

    rmsimons

    10/29/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    I don't think that "Green" in PR use is dead
    just yet but it is definitely being driven
    towards a big brick wall at quite some speed.

    Just take a look at what happened with the term
    "eco-tourism". The entire world suddenly
    offered their existing touris products as eco-
    tours, completely taking away the power of the
    words.

  •  
    8

    gonca.telli@...

    10/29/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    We should also think about what environmentally friendly is. For example if we are talking SMS messages that has no paper waste. Can we say this is environmental? If there are alot of "beeps" or "ringtones" around us we could say we have a uproar problem of the environment.

  •  
    9

    ErinKMcNeely

    10/29/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    If the perception of "green" is convoluted to the public then WE need to do a better job of publicizing ALL that "green" can be. How wonderful to have a word that can evolve into meaning as many things to do with sustainability, conservation, recycling, re-using, re-purposing, and responsibility! We call ours GoGreen at the office...and we are looking for that one thing that appeals to someone so that they will participate. It might just be recycling their soda cans or using less paper towel. I like the big idea of "green" because it can mean something to everyone. Other words are great too...because they are specific and help tie things down for someone. But anyone, everyone could and should be "green" in some way...because it all counts and it all matters and it all can work. We (me and others with my company)have worked very hard to just make our employee population very aware to think "Green" -- in some fashion or form, FIRST. How nice to have a word that we can tout to mean more -- like "love" or "the spirit of Christmas" -- makes it open to include so much more!

  •  
    10

    fintroop

    10/29/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    The use of a "green" qualification must be related to an environmentally safe process and product, considering all the lyfecycle from raw material to recovery or discharge.

    The only information that appears on the packaging as well as on the marketing communication is mostly structured on the "sellability", the attitude to be sold, by simply skipping all the others info related to product. That's the problem.

    The conversion is a matter of culture and this will take time to modify the attitude to consumption...but this not means some people today do not have the opinion that trying to reduce the impact of our lifestyle is a remarkably action, also for the next generations!!!!

    Financially speaking if one has discounted all life to its present value in terms of good, with no reasoning about what does it mean for the future...no value creation in the long run could ever be created.This is an ethic value before an economic one.

    We are living in an irrational way, depleting resources while reason could lead to a better way of consumption.

    Green need to be explained to people ...but information has its costs and consumer do not want to pay for.

    Energy is directly affecting the wallet and this is immediately perceived ....

    Once again an immediate advantage is prefered to a long term one...

    We must reflect on our choices.

  •  
    11

    Bob Wileman

    10/29/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    An attempt to politicise a common sense approach to economical use of resources and the consequences of their use, in order to convert an attitude of "I can afford it therefore I can use it" to one of "I can afford it, but I will use it sparingly and usefully."

  •  
    12

    jmasters@...

    10/29/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    Quite a claim to make with no data cited to support this. I would like to see that data.

    "That???s right ??? the whole push to do things virtually and plugging in is actually worse for the environment, as a whole, than getting in our cars or taking an airplane."

  •  
    13

    fhagie@...

    10/29/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    Avoid labels. Market and sell customer value.

  •  
    14

    GreenCPA

    10/29/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    Your remark that a virtual meeting is worse than getting in a car or taking an airplane doesn't make sense and deserves a retraction.

  •  
    15

    CarolBlaha

    10/29/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    I will challenge you-- you cannot show me one-- ONE company that cannot play the "green" card. We didn't just chuck out our plants, etc and become green overnite. I was a youngster in Pgh where the mills routinely dumped waste water in the river- which would would be shut down with a bunch of wooplah. My masters thesis was on this and I was sure of my thought process but was still surprised/ Today a product has to be long wearing, etc etc and "green". Everything is Life Cycle analysis, and (as a founder of the CO Chapter US Green Bldg Council) can say-- that is where we will separate the "greenwash" which is a term quickly becoming overused and passe-- to understanding LCA and eco isolationism. You can't just recycle and use child labor. You can't have a product that can be legally washed down the sewar that creates medical problem to those who manufacture it.

    LCA is the future of green marketing. I started writing an article on this by request from another source-- it has grown to a 3 part article. First, on FTC requirements- its the friggin law-- dont make claims you can't support. 2nd on LCA and 3rd on "green purchasing" a standard developed by GSA that is developing into an industry standard. If anyone wants the link when I finish-- let me know and let Bnet know so they'll reprint.

  •  
    16

    jongreer

    10/29/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    Thanks to everyone for their comments. To clarify, I didn't say that one virtual meeting used more energy than getting a car and going to the meeting. I said that in aggregate, coal-burning electricity generation plants create more CO2 than the transportation sector. I'm waiting for Suzanne shelton's slides for the back-up info but it was something like 2-1 -- Coal-burning plants generate 30+ percent of the CO2 to about 15% for transportation. So if we all switch out of our cars and plug in to the electric grid, yes, without a doubt, it would be worse for the environment -- unless we replace coal-burning with less harmful ways of generating electricity, like wind, solar and water.

  •  
    17

    mastiazaran

    10/30/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    GREEN works! Not only in the US but also in Mexico City. I found that people who do not speak English relate the word and color to Eco friendly products and/or systems.

  •  
    18

    AlejandroMoreno

    10/30/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    Thanks Jon for clarifying. However, besides the fact
    that we're still waiting for Ms. Shelton's hard data to
    back up this "claim", what about the following?:

    Is Ms. Shelton saying that we should:

    * Go back to faxing instead of e-mailing?
    * We should drive down to the store instead of shop
    online?
    * We should fly to corporate meetings instead of
    having teleconferences and webinars?
    * We should print out letters, documents, receipts,
    invoices etc and give them to the mailman instead of
    e-mailing?
    * What about all the additional waste we generate
    when we travel, have in-flight meals or meals on the
    road/fast food, the paper, plastic utensil and food
    wrapping?
    * Renting cars, the maintenance involved, extra fuel
    consumption and pollution
    *The towels and linens we use at hotels/motels, their
    washing, often with chlorine bleach, and the
    subsequent cleaning of the rooms with water and
    usually non/green chemicals,
    *Taxis and shuttles and all that generates
    *Sending invoices via Fed Ex instead of digitally, ergo
    generating more demand for petroleum based
    combustible-driven transportation?

    It would be better to go back to business as usual?

    I find it hard to believe that all of us taking our cars
    and getting in airplanes would somehow be better.

    If you've calculated your carbon footprint lately
    (http://www.carbonfund.org/site/pages/individuals/cat
    egory/Carbon%20Calculators/ just one of many sites),
    you would know that just one average flight a year
    kicks your carbon footprint WAY up, not to mention
    what the jet plane trails apparently do to global
    warming: http://www.contrails.nl/contrails-
    research/temperature%2002.htm

    I certainly don't have as much business expertise as
    you or Ms. Shelton have, but if I am interpreting her
    and your statements correctly, coming from someone
    with as much clout as you two have, my gut tells me
    your statements quoted above are at best, highly
    irresponsible given the large audiences you both speak
    to and the fields in which they move. So I'd like to
    sincerely extend an opportunity for you to
    communicate with future leaders of Sustainable
    Enterprise at the Green MBA program and others, and
    clarify your statement intentions for us, and most of
    all, give you a chance to correct me if my
    interpretation is wrong, in this public forum.

    Respectully,

    Alejandro Moreno

    Green MBA, Class of 2010
    Dominican University,
    Marin County, CA

    www.greenmba.com

  •  
    19

    jongreer

    10/30/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    Suzanne Shelton did not make the 'plugged in' statement in the last paragraph of my post. That was my interpretation of the data she presented.

    As to the challenges to that statement above: sure, having one conference call appears to be much 'greener' than getting on a plane and going to the meeting. But for that one hour meeting, are you factoring in the massive communication infrastructure that has to be maintained 24/7/365 for your convenience so you can just pick up the phone? Don't you suppose that takes electricity generated by a power plant?

  •  
    20

    valeriehg

    10/31/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    I think the term "green" is a great marketing idea. It has achieved a lot of recognition and created a lot of momentum for people to become more environmentally conscious. We have started a Green Team at my office.

  •  
    21

    amandablake

    11/21/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Consumers Really Think of Green PR

    Wow... I actually answered green.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Top Rated
    advertisement
    • Click Here
    • Click Here
    • Click Here
    advertisement