BNET Insight

Catching Flack

Smart ways to win the public relations game

The Social Media Release Is Still A Work In Progress

March 4th, 2008 @ 12:01 pm

2 Comments

Categories: Media Relations, Online Media, Online PR, Public Relations, Social Media

Tags: Press Release, Social Media, Internet, Jon Greer

Last week, we started the conversation about the Social Media Release, a new-fangled form of press release that is supposedly more effective for bloggers and other Internet users than the current model.

Today was the audio seminar sponsored by Vocus on the subject, featuring Thom Brodeur from Marketwire, Chris Heuer, founder of the Social Media Club, Monika Maeckle of BusinessWire, Brian Solis, founder of FutureWorks.

Here’s a side-by-side comparison of a traditional press release for this event with an SMR version.

smrexample.jpg

As you can see, the “new” release looks a lot like a media advisory.

I sat through the webinar on your behalf, waiting for the one most important piece of information: examples of how this new format was MORE effective than a traditional release in generating coverage. After all, if you don’t have evidence of that, you’re not going to get your boss to approve changing your company’s press release format to this new format. Didn’t get it.
So I’d have to say that this is a change whose time is not quite here yet — in other words, a work in progress.

In case you are wondering, this whole idea was kick-started by a post by a problogger named Tom Foremski, a curmudgeonly type who delights in complaining about PR. Here is the post: Tom Foremski’s Die Press Release Die post.

Here are some comments from the webinar:

  • What is SMR and who is it for? It’s an easier way for bloggers and others to write your story. It’s social and interpersonal rather than one-directional. It’s for “everyone” versus a traditional release, which a speaker said was “just for the company.”
  • BUT — the SMR isn’t a replacement for a traditional press release. It’s an alternative format.

So here’s the bottom line: of course, the Internet has changed communications, and we need to adapt. And yes, the old pseudo-news release format is pretty outdated and was never very satisfying to read or write. But I wouldn’t rush out to scrap your current format, because the evidence isn’t there that this new template is any more effective.

What IS effective is well-written press materials that give the media and other audiences media-ready information including facts and figures, examples, analogies, and human stories, in simple, easy-to-understand language. Keep your sentences and paragraphs short and provide access to background information and graphics via the web. If you do these things, it doesn’t matter which ‘template’ you use.

Did you know that Jon Greer is available to speak to your company or PR agency about PR and media relations? Contact Jon for more information!

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Andrew Arnold

    03/05/08 | Report as spam

    Agreed...

    but the benefit of the SMR for me is the way that it enables distribution of the elements of the story rather than a story "block".

    A traditional press release is split up into its elements according to the editorial decisions of a journalist. A SMR is presented in its componenet parts in a way that makes it easier to redistribute by machine (and bloggers).

    I use one or the other and sometimes both depending on what or who I'm targeting.

    To be honest I don't think names are important. A journalist doesn't care whether he gets sent a press release, a media advisory, a called-in tip, or a few lines written on the back of an envelope. The content is the important factor, we are presenting it in different ways to maximise the use of the content. When form takes over content we end up with the empty-sounding press releases filled with 'best of breed' and 'standards driven' and 'world-class'.

  •  
    2

    travisvan

    03/06/08 | Report as spam

    PR 2.0 Vaporware

    I also agree with your take on the "Social Media" release. Aside from the fancy name - what's really that game-changing about the approach? During all that Web 2.0 fervor, I think a lot of marketing folks were non-participants in social networking ... and has this sense that they were missing some big opportunities. The Social Media release was the magic hair growth tonic that targeted those insecurities. Nice name, nice label, but nothing truly magical.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
Top Rated
    advertisement
    • Click Here
    • Click Here
    • Click Here
    advertisement
    Click Here