BNET Insight

Back to B-School

Helping you get your armchair MBA.

Business Oracles Vs. Technology: Which Will Win Out?

June 12th, 2009 @ 8:38 am

2 Comments

Categories: Academics, Group Dynamics, Managment, Marketing, Research, Strategy

Tags: McAfee Inc., Stacy Blackman

Steve Jobs. Warren Buffet. Don Draper. What do these legendary businessmen (two real, one fictional) have in common? According to Harvard Business School professor Andrew McAfee, they are business oracles, charismatic individuals who produce bold and often brilliant decisions largely by themselves.

Last time we checked in with McAfee, he was showing us how to send 100 Tweets in a day; more recently, he was waxing about the television show Mad Men, and its aforementioned central character, Don Draper. McAfee wonders if, thanks to new technologies, the business oracle might become a relic, much like the 1950s advertising world Mad Men portrays.

So what, exactly, are the traits of a business oracle? Among those McAfee discusses:

  • Opaque: Oracles are unable or unwilling to discuss their decision-making process.
  • My-way-or-the-highway attitude: McAfee writes, “Decisions by … oracles tend to be take-it-or-leave-it propositions, not subject to refinement.”
  • Believe in one solution: Oracles may see customers as one homogeneous group, and believe in a one-size-fits-all solution.
  • Individualistic: Group meetings aren’t a valuable place to gain insight for oracles, but merely a means to carrying out their plans.

McAfee sees these business oracles becoming less significant as customer-related technology improves. Among the breakthroughs he mentions are specialized advertising and marketing campaigns catering to different customer segments and websites that “read” the user and present information differently depending on how the user interacts with the site.  He concludes:

The main problem with relying on old-school oracles to make important business decisions [is] the fact that they might be wrong. When you follow the advice of a Don Draper you’re making a big bet on a black box – you’re committing substantial resources based on a decision process that you don’t understand very well and can’t understand better. You’re just trusting in the oracle’s wisdom, and if he turns out to be not that wise you’re in trouble.

The takeaway from this? If your business relies on the gut decisions of a few powerful individuals, you may find yourself outperformed by those who employ a more rigorous and logical approach. However, McAfee is careful not to suppose that oracles will be obsolete in a few more years, but looks to the possibility of combining “insights from business oracles with other sources and methods, thereby making improved business decisions.”

Oracle image courtesy of Flickr user napalm filled tires, CC 2.0

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    osterwalder@...

    06/17/09 | Report as spam

    Oracles will remain a factor in innovation

    I only partially buy into McAfee's argument. It is true that putting resources into opaque decisions is less than optimal. However, I don't believe that customer related technologies are good enough to detect breakthrough innovations. The really powerful innovations actually often break with what customers would tell you. Skype, IKEA, iPod/iTunes, GrameenBank all wouldn't exist if we only listened to customer technologies and not business visionaries....

  •  
    2

    waqueau

    06/17/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Business Oracles Vs. Technology: Which Will Win Out?

    Customer-related technology can only interpret what the customer wants through actions and reactions. The oracle has the ability to pursue what the customer doesn't even know they want yet (e.g., the iPod and iTunes). While it is risky to place one's bets on the instincts of one person, it is with high risk that one reaps great reward. Pick your poison: predictable results through technology or spectacular results through creative insight and vision. Tough call...

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
Quick Poll
What is the most important source of information about MBA programs?
Family, friends, work colleagues, or an undergraduate professor or advisor
Individual schools’ websites
Individual schools’ advertisements (newspaper, magazines, radio, internet)
Viewbooks and other print mailings from the schools
MBA resource websites and blogs
Rankings and news articles in BusinessWeek, Financial Times, or other publications

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Stacy Blackman Stacy Sukov Blackman is president of Stacy Blackman Consulting, where she consults on MBA admissions. She earned her MBA from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University and her Bachelor of Science from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Stacy serves on the Board of Directors of AIGAC, the Association of International Graduate Admissions Consultants, and has published a guide to MBA Admissions, The MBA Application Roadmap. more »

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement