BNET Insight

Back to B-School

Helping you get your armchair MBA.

Four Lessons Learned from GM

June 5th, 2009 @ 8:52 am

19 Comments

Categories: Career, Managment, Schools, Strategy

Tags: Professor, General Motors Corp., Koehn, Litigation, Personal Finance, Business Operations, Stacy Blackman

The announcement Monday that GM filed for bankruptcy brought about a spate of stories dominating the news cycle this week. Much of the coverage reflected on GM’s glorious past and the changes the company underwent in the past 30 years that led to its downfall.  Among those commenting were Harvard Business School professors, and here are a few lessons that can be distilled from their musings.

1. Make change preemptively

If you see something in your company that need changing, don’t wait until it’s too late. Professor Robert Austin worked in the U.S. auto industry in the mid 1990s. He recalls that when the industry faced tough problems, “we started to feel the real pain associated with real change, [and] we pulled back. We were so profitable then, it was hard to muster the will to make the hard choices.” Difficult or not, what has happened to GM since shows the price a company can pay for sticking its head in the sand.

2. Don’t lose sight of your company’s core values

Professor Nancy Koehn writes that GM’s first managers valued three key things: being attuned to customers’ lives, staying keenly aware of the competition and understanding how company structure related to its strategy. She attributes the company’s “long, slow bleed” to “several generations of executives, beginning in the 1970s with the first oil shocks and the entrance of Japanese imports,” who lost sight of these key values. Koehn writes, “It has been a failure of leadership as astounding and momentous as the company’s early achievement. ”

3. Streamline offerings

Professor John Quelch says that one of GM’s biggest mistakes has been confusing consumers:

The Toyota and BMW product lines are very simple, easy for a salesperson to explain and easy for the consumer to understand. There is a logic to the product lineup. Desperate to retain share in the US, GM continues to add to its already confusing array of 60 models under 8 different brand names…. Buying a car is an infrequent purchase; the consumer needs a clear roadmap of what is on offer.

As Toyota and BMW’s success attests, keeping it simple is far from stupid.

4. Be an innovator

GM’s complacency in the marketplace was a big reason for its eventual failure; as Professor Rosabeth Moss Kanter eloquently puts it, “Where others see merely bankruptcy, I see a bankruptcy of ideas. The issue for GM is not just financial failure, it is a failure of imagination.”

She goes on to ask the Obama administration “to help innovative new companies emerge from the ashes of GM. The entrepreneurial spirit will restore the American economy more effectively than propping up falling giants.”

Readers, what are you taking away from GM’s bankruptcy?

GM truck image courtesy of Flickr user Dave_7, CC 2.0

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    sbmack

    06/08/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    More of the obvious from the wizened Harvard cognoscenti. Their opinions and a buck thirty-five will get you a Metro ride here in DC. Yawn...

    P.S. How come they weren't making noise about this as GM was on the glide slope to oblivion over the past 10 years?

  •  
    2

    jimmie0729

    06/09/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    To me it's a shame to file bankruptcy. It's not honest. I have owned three Escalades and one CTS, they are great cars and I was very happy. My most recent vehicle a Lexus GX 470 (a wonderful high quality car). My next new purchase will probable be another GX 470 Lexus, sorry I am disappointed in GM's character in this whole matter. jimmie0729 in Indiana

  •  
    3

    kohlkf

    06/09/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    GM's demise is inevitable given its dubious reputation for quality and reliable cars. I point my figure at the organisation structure and culture which was (is?) lacking of integrated customer response system. It's only fair to capitalism that the likes of GM should fall.

  •  
    4

    aa8vs

    06/09/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    There should be a lesson learned while auto industry has had problems, forced bankruptcy and restructuring the real issue seems to me [missed by folks] is with the economy in the tank no one will be willing to buy cars or houses yet and the restructure could be a waste of time.

    The way Government is stepping in and pushing illegal actions and cutting out investors they will not be trusted either for any company's future investment since rules can be changed by government at will.

    All in all a sad state of affairs and our money will soon be worth nothing and that is N O T the auto / UAW's fault IMHO

  •  
    5

    Frank777

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    I think the most important lesson that has been missed is the one about corporate greed and lack of consequence.. GM is purely a symptom of this new monster that lurks.. It seems that it is now okay for senior executives to mess up and ruin the lives of millions without sufering any personal consequences such as personal bankruptcy etc .. Time for a new corporate model where there are personal consequences to your actions

  •  
    6

    jlester23

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    What do Harvard professors know about business? Obviously nothing.

  •  
    7

    steveo@...

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    Something seems to be missing from the list...

    Hmmmm. What could it be... let's see.

    GM had a choice: Go out of business yesterday, or pay above market wages and go out of business today. The cost differential from the horse-choking UAW contracts led to a price differential, resulting in an inferior value proposition. It's not that the cars were bad -- they were just overpriced by $2,000 or so to cover the above-market wages.

    It is inevitable that GM would gradually lose market share. They simply shrunk to the point where they could no longer sustain their overhead. GM's demise has been like a train wreck in slow motion. Everybody can see is happening, but nobody can stop it.

    Since the so-called restructuring never addressed the underlying problem, you can expect Round Two in a few years.

  •  
    8

    rpwillia0@...

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    GM is gone; we just need to wait for the funeral

    I will never buy a GM car again! I am thrilled they are selling Saturn as I have an LS2 and it is the best car I ever owned. GM does not innovate and is still stuck with a work force that is focused on themselves and not their customers. The management is equally screwed up and oblivious as to what it takes to succeed. Why is it Hyundai, BMW, Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Mitsubishi and a few others can build cars here in the US that are cost competitive and high quality. It is the workers willing to be flexible and build what is needed that day and not bound by a lot of stupid union rules designed to increase head count. Also the other guys pay basically the same wages, they are just more productive and focused on quality. I say good riddance to GM and Chrysler.

  •  
    9

    upshift

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    Is it possible that if the gov't had enforced and increased
    CAFE standards from 1975 onwards and had increased the
    price of gasoline, like every other Industrialized nation did in
    1974 and onwards, that GM, Chrysler and Ford would not be
    in the mess that they are in.

    On an unrelated manner I can't understand why the union is
    the problem if management agreed to everything the union
    wanted.
    All the media point to the union as the culprit, why not
    management?

  •  
    10

    raymonj

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    Over the past 5 years, GM has put together an incredible product line-up and it keeps getting better (see the new Buick LaCrosse, Chevy Equinox, all the Cadillacs, etc.) The Saturn line was positioned to take-off until the market crashed. Also, their dependability and customer satisfaction ratings are right up there with any of the imports. GM failed in educating the consumer--there is a false perception in the market that GM makes bad products when it's just not true.

    The lesson is that you can't assume everyone knows the facts. Perception is reality and companies need to make sure they are creating the right perception.

  •  
    11

    NicoleinON

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    Here's a learning: Spend less money on lawyers for decades fighting higher fuel efficiency & safety requirements in Congress so that you don't have to come to the government begging for a handout for R&D'ing better fuel efficiency and safety requirements for your products!

  •  
    12

    larryswinford

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    I sold cars for a while and read in an industry magazine how Oldsmobile (then the oldest American car brand) had a customer loyalty and retention level (particularly for the 88 and 98 models) "that other companies would kill for." Nonetheless, it was the first to go. I once owned a Chevette and my father a cadillac. I got 30-35 mpg and he got 35-40 mpg. They (mercifully) killed the Chevette, but stupidly modified the Cadillac back to less frugal gas mileage efficiencies. When Saturn's innovations became obvious, they limited the expansion of Saturn dealerships and none of the rest of GM followed closely, if at all.

    Finally, car dealerships and financing were lessons not learned. I used to get customers sold on the car with an assumption of the sticker price, but by the time the finance phase "cheat'em dance" was over, they were so frustrated that even thousand dollar discounts were not enough to compensate. Twenty minutes to fall in love with a car, followed by two hours of smoke and mirrors with the financing killed an enormous number of sales and company good will.

  •  
    13

    RFSII

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    It's ironic that you have people from Harvard Business School
    commenting because if you trace back most of the current problems
    with the economy they lead to graduates of that very school. The
    problem is not with executives, it's with the training they receive in
    our leading business schools. For some reason, the professors of
    those schools have consciously or not created a short-sighted
    culture of greed, arrogance, and self-interest. That's the real
    question we need to be asking. Why have our business schools at
    the very highest level, brought this economic disaster upon us?

  •  
    14

    W Byerly

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    I disagree with the 4th point regarding Innovation. GM has a rich history of innovation. What has been missing is execution. The EV1 was unsustainable, the Aztek ugly and the Volt is late. Dig deep, and you will find many of the great "innovations" of the Japanese car companies were first developed by GM.

    Personally, I blame the lack of top-down quality processes as the single biggest contributor to GM's demise.

  •  
    15

    jkpiraino

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    GM: Leaders without vested interests.

    As is true of too many American corporate giants, the mega-firms (GM and a host of financial firms and others) have leaderships with no long-term interests in their companies. Everything is a short-term scheme. It's no surprise that Ford, under Ford's leadership, is fairing better.

    As firms evolve into giants they become more like government bureaucracies that use government favors and illegal manipulations to maintain market share and revenues. This is not only anti-competitive but anti-productive. Relying on government favors, these firms naturally lose sight of the whole focus of business: the customer.

    This is also true when firms come to dominate markets, as GM did for so many decades. Once a company thinks it can survive by fooling consumers and selling sizzle instead of steak, they are ultimately doomed.

    I can't think of any large firm that's failing where there's a vested leadership interest at the top. I also think there's a solution here for firms without vested leadership at the top:

    Tax corporate salaries/bonuses on a progressive basis that continues up to 50%. However, drop the tax on corporate dividends so that after holding stock for a year, future dividends are taxed at far lower rates. This finally links up the corporate executives' pay to the benefits that shareholders get.

    Generally making corporate executives' benefits concurrent with shareholder benefits is the largest single gap in American tax policy and must be changed if we're to compete globally. We need creative leaders at the top, not scam artists who don't care about customers or the future health of the firms they manage.

  •  
    16

    joecap

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    I'm a former GMer, and GMI attendee in the 1950's. My mom and dad both worked at Chevrolet for their entire working lives. I stopped buying GM cars 25 years ago when I saw an interview with Robert Stemper (sic) the then CEO. GM was having a terrible time against the Japanese imports and was making some pretty bad cars. The interviewer asked Stemper if he was proud of any GM car. His response was that he was "certainly proud of Cadillac.."
    I thought 'what a elitist jerk this man is' he's proud of a car that can be purchased by 2% of the people in the market. How about Chevrolet? Pontiac? Buick? Oldsmobile? Couldn't this overpaid idiot be proud of those brands? GM deserves to be out of business.

  •  
    17

    Jonathan Davidson

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    There's plenty of blame to be spread around to both
    management and the unions. But don't worry, now that we
    have the government involved, all the employees will be
    happier, work harder and efficiency will increase!


    To the point of credibility, can I please find out what
    successful business the esteemed educators have started or
    led?

  •  
    18

    Stacy Blackman

    06/11/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    @ Jonathan Davidson: Good point about "what businesses have the started or led?" However, I don't know that they are saying they could have done all of this better. There is always something to learn from failure - sometimes that is the silver lining. The failures here are massive and have been a long time coming. I think it's interesting to try to learn and apply to the challenges that we all face, most much smaller than saving GM.

  •  
    19

    majorstu

    06/12/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Four Lessons Learned from GM

    Having worked for the GM/Delphi love/hate partnership for nearly 25 years, I will concur with the 4 fairly obvious points from the esteemed B-School lecturers. The total customer experience in the frustration of the financing process is also certainly a factor. GM has been on a downward glide-path since the OPEC embargo of the 70's. The forensics are considerably simpler than preventive intervention.

    The B-school influence cannot be denied, however, on both the macroeconomic downfall that triggered the demise, regardless of how inevitable it ultimately was. The culture of profit over value, short-term gain over long-term growth, and instant gratification over craftsmanship has been prevalent at both hourly and salaried levels at GM and Chrysler, but also in the general culture. When managers can count on being in a position 2 -3 years, without having to live with the consequences of their decisions before moving on, an unaccountable culture is created. When I worked at Opel, they still had a culture where a technical/business expertise was established and maintained over dozens of years, not dozens of months, which established a much longer view of the consequences of one's decisions. GM's culture rewarded shoot-from-the-hip. A gaming analogy is that GM played poker, taking a chance, and tossing in the cards if it didn't pan out, then anteing up for another round. Toyota, BMW, and Honda have been playing Chess, looking 10 -12 rounds ahead.

    Similarly, the Congress is failing to learn the lessons that GM is trying to teach them about spending for today and passing the bill to their successors.

    I remember to the moment when I lost any confidence in GM's management. I was attending a training seminar with W. Edward Deming, whom many regard as "the father of quality", having instructed the post-WWII Japanese on rebuilding their manufacturing base, and famous for harping on "understanding the process". They interrupted this session to announce the hiring of Inaki Lopez away from VW, and the cultural change to "quality is a given" and the emphasis on looking only at the bottom line, cost being the predominant factor, with performance, reliability, service, efficient design, or delivery timing all taking a back seat. They never recovered from the Lopez years, and that influence.

    Real lesson from GM: Never rely on the bottom line. It's the easiest one to manipulate. You have to understand the process.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
Quick Poll
What is the most important source of information about MBA programs?
Family, friends, work colleagues, or an undergraduate professor or advisor
Individual schools’ websites
Individual schools’ advertisements (newspaper, magazines, radio, internet)
Viewbooks and other print mailings from the schools
MBA resource websites and blogs
Rankings and news articles in BusinessWeek, Financial Times, or other publications

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Stacy Blackman Stacy Sukov Blackman is president of Stacy Blackman Consulting, where she consults on MBA admissions. She earned her MBA from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University and her Bachelor of Science from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Stacy serves on the Board of Directors of AIGAC, the Association of International Graduate Admissions Consultants, and has published a guide to MBA Admissions, The MBA Application Roadmap. more »

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement