BNET Insight

Back to B-School

Helping you get your armchair MBA.

Entrepreneurs Knock Out MBAs in Tough Times?

May 15th, 2009 @ 9:02 am

5 Comments

Categories: Academics, Career, Group Dynamics, Marketing, Research, Strategy

Tags: MBA, Entrepreneur, Entrepreneurship, Management, Stacy Blackman

As if MBAs didn’t have enough problems already. First, they were being likened to monsters who caused the economic meltdown. Now, there are rumblings that MBAs don’t have what it takes to help mend the economic crisis.

“As the economy experiences the most deep-seated changes in decades, maybe it’s time to change our minds about what kinds of people are best-equipped to become business leaders,” writes Bill Taylor on his recent Harvard Business blog post “MBAs vs. Entrepreneurs: Who Has the Right Stuff for Tough Times?”

Taylor’s money is on the entrepreneurs.

Entrepreneurs and MBAs think differently

Citing research from Professor Saras Sarasvathy, who teaches entrepreneurship at the Darden Graduate School of Business at the University of Virginia, Taylor writes that entrepreneurs’ problem-solving methods are different from those of MBAs, and possibly superior in crisis situations.

The article explains that MBAs practice “causal” reasoning, while entrepreneurs are “effectual.” The difference comes down to this:

Causal reasoning is about how much you expect to gain; effectual reasoning is about how much you can afford to lose. Causal reasoning revolves around competitive analysis and zero-sum logic; effectual reasoning embraces networks and partnerships. Causal reasoning  ‘urges the exploitation of pre-existing knowledge’; effectual reasoning stresses the inevitability of surprises and the leveraging of options.

So what do those differences mean?

Again citing Sarasvathy, Taylor writes that MBAs believe that predicting the future means controlling it, and so they place a lot of weight on focus groups and statistical models. Entrepreneurs, on the other hand, are not interested in predicting the future so much as inventing it, by “marshalling scarce resources, understanding that surprises are to be expected rather than avoided [and] reacting to them fast.”

The entrepreneurial mindset, Taylor writes, is the obvious “match” for the current environment. He concludes that entrepreneurs, “are the ones with the right stuff for tough times.”

While there is certainly much to learn from non-MBA holding entrepreneurs, the distinction Taylor draws between MBAs and entrepreneurs feels false to me. Sarasvathy, after all, teaches entrepreneurship to MBA students, and countless MBAs have gone on to become successful entrepreneurs. Though in the past I’ve questioned whether entrepreneurship can truly be taught, I’ve also written about how my MBA education gave me necessary skills for launching my businesses. Instead of putting the two parties in the ring, why not encourage them to bring their unique resources together and duke it out with the real enemy: the economic crisis?

Boxing ring image courtesy of Flickr user craighwk, CC 2.0

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    BionicWoman

    05/15/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Entrepreneurs Knock Out MBAs in Tough Times?

    This article linked states that mba's use "Causal reasoning" and the article linked to above also states that causal reasoning is " optimal ? fastest, cheapest, most efficient, etc. ? alternative to achieve that goal." This is the world of exhaustive business plans, microscopic ROI calculations, and portfolio diversification. " and that "effectual reasoning" is "does not begin with a specific goal. Instead, it begins with a given set of means and allows goals to emerge contingently over time.."
    I can only speak from my experience and entreprenuers I have met. All of the projects and plans that I've been involved with have had goals. In every instance, ROI and increasing and reaching sales goals has always been top priority. I imagine the way goals are set vary widely among businesses and individuals, at least that has been my experience. The entrepreneurs I have met directly felt the impact of ROI, especially because their company was privately funded and thus every penny had to be accounted for. Every entreprenuer or privately funded company that I have been involved with has always tried to innovate different methods to reach customers and they were very well aware of the trial and error methods involved especially if it was their first time exploring new territory. They were also aware that they had to minimize risks afterall money flowed from their pockets. The successful entreprenuers I have met act on both causal and effectual reasoning. Perhaps that is what makes them so successful, because they looked at how much they could afford to lose and how much they could gain and balance that out. That was key to making their business grow. I imagine that most successful small businesses continue to grow because they know that you don't just jump from A to Z, rather it's strategic solid growth of balancing how much your spending with how much your making and reinvesting into your business.
    The successful entrepreneurs I have met understand this extremely well and thus grow and remain privately owned and profitable. Many companies that I've been involved with have expanded into other areas as well. Goals are important and vital to any successful mba or entrepreneur because it gives you something to work for. Your work and plan depends on it. I don't think we should overgeneralize entrepreneurs to lay out plans without any goals and "play it by ear." Although I'm sure there are some that do and perhaps they end up failing. I think it's important to draw distinctions between successful and non-successful entreprenuers. Perhaps the same can be said of mbas.
    I believe this article has logical fallacies and overgeneralizes characteristics to be either black or white, when in reality there are many shades of grey that are dependent on many factors. Perhaps I misunderstood and the article was in regards to "more likely" situations within a certain set of conditions rather than generalized truth statements. I'm sure just like entreprenuers cannot be lumped into one category with defining charactersitics neither can mbas whether successful or not, especially when considering "reasoning" abilities and relationships that rely on the very wide array of intellectual abiities of individuals. I believe there are too many differences in mbas and entrepreneurs that are within very small (one person) to very large businesses (thousands of people) to lump them into two categories including differences in environmental (local and global), resources, personal (pesonality characteristics and intellectual abilities), and many others. However, in all due respect for the author and the professor it makes for an interesting conversation and furthers discussion and thought into areas in an effort to advance society and knowledge. I certainly can appreciate their hard work and mentorship. It would be intersting to see case studies in this area. Great article nonetheless; it's thought provoking!

  •  
    2

    Stacy Blackman

    05/17/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Entrepreneurs Knock Out MBAs in Tough Times?

    @BionicWoman: you make a really good point here re lumping them into 2 categories...thanks for the thoughtful reply!

  •  
    3

    BionicWoman

    05/19/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Entrepreneurs Knock Out MBAs in Tough Times?

    Though some might regard this as information. I think it's important to point out that truth statements, from a seemingly reputable source, which have logical flaws or don't convey the "story" in it's entirety can have damaging affects on society. Some people regard what they read from such sources as factual and unquestionable and thus such information can become hard coded into their thought schemes and can affect their discussions and perceptions about people and the world in unknown quantities and qualities. I believe that information passed on, especially from highly reputable sources, must attempt to uphold the highest of standards in truthfulness and completeness.

  •  
    4

    mbtompkins

    05/20/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Entrepreneurs Knock Out MBAs in Tough Times?

    A product of five generations of entreprenuers- I believe that the financial crises issue is a moral one. The old generations rarely forsook God. In 1962 we removed the moral comapss that made america great- we became amoral and the willingness to lie and do whatever it takes to profit at any cost to other persons/companies/employers has flourished.

    When we return to the God of our fathers we will begin to profit again as our moral compass becomes moral- on the part of each individual person and individuals apply integrity, truth and fairness.

    What goes around- comes around

  •  
    5

    Econ 1

    05/22/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Entrepreneurs Knock Out MBAs in Tough Times?

    Amen mbtompkins...........

    The rest sounds like "right brainers" trying to make themselves relevant.

    No wonder the Y geners are confused!

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
Quick Poll
What is the most important source of information about MBA programs?
Family, friends, work colleagues, or an undergraduate professor or advisor
Individual schools’ websites
Individual schools’ advertisements (newspaper, magazines, radio, internet)
Viewbooks and other print mailings from the schools
MBA resource websites and blogs
Rankings and news articles in BusinessWeek, Financial Times, or other publications

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Stacy Blackman Stacy Sukov Blackman is president of Stacy Blackman Consulting, where she consults on MBA admissions. She earned her MBA from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University and her Bachelor of Science from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Stacy serves on the Board of Directors of AIGAC, the Association of International Graduate Admissions Consultants, and has published a guide to MBA Admissions, The MBA Application Roadmap. more »

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement