BNET Insight

Back to B-School

Helping you get your armchair MBA.

What Do VC Firms Have in Common With High School Cliques?

November 20th, 2009 @ 6:00 am

Categories: Career, Finance, Group Dynamics, Research

Tags: Venture-capital Company, Clique, Firm, Venture Capital, Finance, Financing Startups, Stacy Blackman

Ahh, high school. The time in one’s life where buying the right sweater seemed just as important as having clean air to breathe. While most of us have at least some fond memories of high school, many are happy to leave those days of adolescent angst behind. So what happens when you find out that the business world is more like high school than you thought it would be?

New research from the Kellogg School of Management finds that in the world of VC firms, there are established cliques (the cool kids, if you will) and new kids, or new firms, trying to find their way into the cliques.

The research was conducted by Yael Hochberg, a professor at the Kellogg School of Management; Alexander Ljungqvist a professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business; and Yang Lu, an assistant VP at Barclays Capital. Here are some of the effects of VC cliques they found, as reported by a Kellogg Insight article:

  • Established firms field each other new, promising deals that they can’t take on themselves. This makes finding funding easier for start-ups, but makes it difficult for new VC firms to find these deals.
  • VC firms tend to flock to areas of new business creation, and those that have been in the same location for a long time establish strong networks and relationships with the entrepreneurial community. Therefore, it’s nearly impossible for new firms to break into areas like the Silicon Valley and Boston’s Route 128.
  • Firms that are open to outsiders may be punished for betraying the confines of the clique as well. “Incumbent” firms that do business with newbies experience an average 2.3 percent reduction in opportunities fielded by their network, a number that increases over time.

However, the research also finds that new firms can eventually find their way in with established VCs. When new firms approach incumbent firms with the offer of entering a new market, established firms may be willing to suffer their network’s disapproval for the new opportunity.

While this research deals with VC firms specifically, it made me curious whether any of you reading this have ever felt in a business situation like you were back in high school. If so, please leave a comment and share your experience.

Letter jacket image courtesy of Flickr user grovesa16, CC 2.0

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Steve Tobak

    11/20/09 | Report as spam

    RE: What Do VC Firms Have in Common With High School Cliques?

    Stacy,

    The corporate world ... cliquish? Wow, you think? wink

    It's pervasive - the more dysfunctional the company, the more cliquish and juvenile the behavior.

    As for the VC world, I don't think the so-called network effects that create barriers for new firms are so much cliquish as they are credibility and reputation based, as Matt McCall says in the Kellog piece. It's really no different than any new company entering a market with entrenched competitors, IMO.

    Still, I have to give those MBA school profs credit for continually coming up with creative stuff to research that nobody in the real business world cares about. But hey, who am I to rain on the academic parade, right?

    Steve Tobak

  •  
    2

    argentum47

    11/23/09 | Report as spam

    RE: What Do VC Firms Have in Common With High School Cliques?

    The business community is extremely cliquish. In the financial services world this is highly prevelent. Its sometimes honestly hard to objectively quantify why person x is worth more or less than person Y. As a result, managers make subjective decisions based on their personal feelings. The cultures of the firms I've worked at are driven by the personalty of the top senior executives. If you didn't fit in with that culture, you were paid less and given less opportunity, irrespective of performance. For example, if your manager golfs every weekend, you'd better get out there at least twice a month. Doesn't matter if you have a family, or a life outside of work.

    In my experience this type of conduct has only had negative. It's caused poor moral, lowered overall productivity, promoted poor leaders and contributed to the collapse businesses. It is counterproductive, stifles innovation and creativity, and causes real moral hazard issues.

    Everyone basically knows this, but unfortunetly it is human nature. Elite institutions foster exclusivity to maintain and enhance their stature. This is the same in the Legal profession, the medical profession, the academic profession, etc, etc.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Quick Poll
What is the top reason for going back to Business School?
Career Advancement
Networking
Personal Growth
All of the Above

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Stacy Blackman Stacy Sukov Blackman is president of Stacy Blackman Consulting, where she consults on MBA admissions. She earned her MBA from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University and her Bachelor of Science from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Stacy serves on the Board of Directors of AIGAC, the Association of International Graduate Admissions Consultants, and has published a guide to MBA Admissions, The MBA Application Roadmap. more »

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement