BNET Insight

BNET Intercom

News and observations from the BNET staff

Google Busts Out a New Ad Trick

March 21st, 2007 @ 3:55 pm

3 Comments

Categories: Marketing

Tags: Google Inc., Advertisement, Advertiser, Pay-per-click Advertising, Andrew Hines

We're all familiar with John Wanamaker's famous lament: "I know half of all my advertising dollars are wasted, but I don't know which half." The problem is that it's nearly impossible to know which advertising agencies, channels, or individual ads are responsible for stimulating revenue.  But Google's new ad program may change that forever — and at just the right time, too.

Just weeks after Yahoo! came out with the Panama Project, a system designed to maximize return for its pay-per-click advertisers, Google has begun the trial phase of a pay-per-action ad program that could eventually make pay-per-click programs extinct. The per-action framework requires advertisers to pay up only when customers actually do something, like, say, make a purchase.

A few smaller firms have offered pay-per-action programs for years, but Google's trial run suggests the internet search battle has entered a new phase of competition. There's just one pricey catch with Google's new program: advertisers pay about 100 times more for per-action ads, according to a BusinessWeek article by Catherine Holahan.

On balance, the big question is whether marketers will ultimately prefer the accountability of Google's pay-per-action program over the efficiency of Yahoo's newly optimized per-click model.  Two very different strategies to win one very big pie.  Stay tuned.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    serenalove146

    03/29/07 | Report as spam

    good concept

    This is a good idea, hopefully the system works properly and they don't run into the problem with phony-action clicks.

  •  
    2

    tboonyawan@...

    03/29/07 | Report as spam

    Google might be cheating themselves

    Google's pay-per-action program can definitely be a stronger sale than the pay-per-click program for an advertiser, but this can hurt Google in terms of recognizing all of the effects an advertisement has on an audience. We tend to forget about those (myself included) who learn about a product online, but refuse to buy online before seeing, touching and feeling the product.
    Overall, Google would have a good case in charging a high premium for this type of action program, but advertisers should not limit their advertising to this model and bank on this model as their source of awareness generator.

  •  
    3

    gregf@...

    03/30/07 | Report as spam

    Some actions are more equal than others

    Pay per-action is useful for direct marketing applications...and is probably worth 100 times conventional CPMs (it gets us closer to building in a reliable variable cost per unit for promotion). But for other applications and objectives, such as awareness, we might still be playing the guessing game with efficiency...unless we get very creative about defining "action" and Google figures out how to price, for example, an "awareness action" v. a "purchase action."

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement