BNET Insight

BNET Intercom

News and observations from the BNET staff

Big Food's Hunger Myth

November 17th, 2009 @ 1:43 pm

Categories: BNET, International Business, Leadership, Management, Public policy, Research, Supply Chain, Sustainability, economy

Tags: Food, America, Food & Beverage, Manufacturing, Stefan Deeran, Kraft, the Campbell Soup Company, Wal-Mart, ConAgra Foods, Tom Vilsack

According to a new report by the US Department of Agriculture, more than one in seven American families suffered from “food insecurity” sometime in 2008 and we should all be concerned that that figure is rising.  Many media outlets have eaten this report up at face value, blasting similar headlines about how more Americans are “going hungry.”

This hunger awareness drive is not new, though.  Feeding America, a nonprofit funded in large part by the food industry, and its partner, the Ad Council, have been running an Ogilvy-powered ad campaign for a year now which claims one in eight Americans “live with hunger.”  Feeding America even connected with Matt Damon to pitch its hunger talking points on the season finale of HBO’s Entourage.

Obviously, everyone is against hunger.  And whenever someone in a country as rich as America can’t afford food, it’s a disgrace. We clearly have the resources to keep everyone well-fed.

So here’s my problem: these hunger numbers just don’t seem to add up when you realize how many people in America are over-fed.

Just look at Feeding America’s own website.  Do their “faces of hunger” from across America look like they’re starving to you?

We don’t have a serious hunger problem in the land of the absurdly cheap one dollar double cheeseburger. We have an obesity epidemic.

Let’s check the government’s own data.  In 2008, only one state (Colorado) had an obesity rate that was less than 20 percent.  According to the latest CDC stats, 32.7 percent of American adults are now overweight, 34.3 percent are obese and 5.9 percent are are extremely obese.  I’m supposed to believe that roughly 14 percent of American families are “food insecure” when only 27 percent of American adults are not overweight or obese?

Many will counter that it must be poor people and the nation’s children who are “going hungry.”  But again, according to the government’s own data, around 17 percent of children are now obese. And paradoxically, many studies have confirmed a correlation between poverty and obesity. While the USDA claims that one in seven American families are “food insecure,” the CDC’s data shows that one of seven low-income, preschool-aged children is obese.

So why is Big Food trying to convince us that there is a huge hunger problem?  My theory is that Feeding America and its backers, which include Kraft, the Campbell Soup Company, Wal-Mart and ConAgra Foods, want to hype hunger so that no new regulations try to tackle obesity.  What politician would dare propose a new tax on fatty or empty calorie foods when the public thinks one in seven families can’t put enough food on the table?  And who is now going to try and stop the redistribution of tens of billions of our tax dollars to King Corn and his Frankenfood court each year?

One thing is certain.  President Obama’s controversial pick to lead the USDA, Iowa’s former Governor Tom Vilsack, and his friends at Monsanto, won’t be going hungry any time soon.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Bouchart

    11/17/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Big Food's Hunger Myth

    I was going hungry at lunchtime. That's why I packed a sandwich.

  •  
    2

    Ian P

    11/18/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Big Food's Hunger Myth

    Stefan
    Many of your posts annoy me intensly, mostly because I see in them much of the extreme left wing radical activism that has destroyed our freedoms and personal wealth in the UK and Europe and will rapidly lead you guys down the same path.
    However, with this posting you managed to annoy me for the opposite reason. You took an unwarranted flyer at the poor of your nation - slyly implying they are overweight charity grubbers making the most they can out of a generous system.
    It is very much the case when you can't afford a good diet and through necessity eat poor quality high fat / high sugar foods you put on large amounts of weight and the longer you are in this position the more obese you will become.
    The stress of unemployment or low quality jobs tends to push you into eating poorer foods and the cycle is merciless.

    Poverty is relative to your society and US 'poverty' level incomes are roughly treble those of the UK and 100 times those of African states, but anyone who feels beholden to accept food hand-outs, must see themselves as in dire need.

  •  
    3

    darinrj

    11/18/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Big Food's Hunger Myth

    Stefan, I think this article does you a disservice ? I tend to expect better researched materials from you.

    Hunger Task Force: Food insecurity has been described as "a condition in which people lack basic food intake to provide them with the energy and nutrients for fully productive lives."

    UN Food and Agriculture Organization: ?Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.?

    US Department of Agriculture: ?Food security for a household means access by all members at all times to enough food for an active, healthy life. Food security includes at a minimum (1) the ready availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods, and (2) an assured ability to acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways"

    Food insecurity is not about starvation or famine. It is rather similar to undernourishment and is a contributor to obesity. Individuals and families who cannot afford ?sufficient, safe and nutritious food? turn to the inexpensive alternatives to sustain them: sodas, fast food and canned goods.

    Multiple sources via Wikipedia: ?From 1971 to 2000, obesity rates in the United States increased from 14.5% to 30.9%. For women during that time, the average caloric increase was 335 calories per day, while for men the average increase was 168 calories per day. Most of these extra calories came from an increase in carbohydrate consumption. The primary source is sweetened beverages, which now account for almost 25% of daily calories in young adults in America. Also, societies have become increasingly reliant on energy-dense fast-food meals. In the United States consumption of fast-food meals tripled and calorie intake from these meals quadrupled between 1977 and 1995.?

    So it is highly likely that those who suffer with food insecurity also deal with obesity and malnutrition. It?s about the quality of the food ? not the quantity.

  •  
    4

    Stefan Deeran

    11/18/09 | Report as spam

    Food insecurity v hunger

    @darinrj How "food insecurity" is defined is important and that's my point. Consider Tom Vilsack's quote in the AP article: "This report suggests its time for America to get very serious about food security and hunger." Feeding America and the USDA are not saying "too many people can't afford fresh fruit and vegetables or other types of healthy food." They are framing this as a hunger issue and that implies that people are starving and can't afford enough food. If this debate centered around access and affordability of junk food vs. healthy food, then we'd be debating why the producers of cheap foods (such as Feeding America's backers) get better subsidies than organic vegetable farmers, for example.

  •  
    5

    daleacademicos

    11/18/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Big Food's Hunger Myth

    Brazilian Giant JBS Agrees to Buy Pilgrim's Pride - WSJ.comSep 17, 2009 ... Pilgrim's Pride agreed to sell a majority stake to Brazilian beef giant JBS for $800 million plus debt, taking the second-largest US chicken ...
    online.wsj.com/article/SB125310503697015705.html

    I agree that food insecurity merits policy attention, but until Obama gets real when the next farm bill comes around, the author's post reveals another fault of the young administration.

  •  
    6

    arvindk

    11/18/09 | Report as spam

    Bang on the money

    Of course, the food insecurity bogey is a Big Business ploy. It is so plain from 3,000 km away (i am writing from India). Social security should take care of basic food needs.

    the big challenge is quality of calorific intake, but that is another big business stronghold. given that a serious % of several people's calorie intake is sugared water, there is a lot that Big Business has to answer for.

  •  
    7

    yunfei Cao

    12/08/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Big Food's Hunger Myth

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Stefan Deeran Stefan Deeran helps environmental nonprofits and green businesses develop and execute their new media campaigns. He also publishes The Exception magazine, a nonpartisan news platform serving his home state of Maine. You can follow him on Twitter @RStefanDeeran or via Facebook. more »

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement