BNET Insight

BNET Intercom

News and observations from the BNET staff

Can Obama's Green Jobs Czar Deliver After Controversial Comments?

September 4th, 2009 @ 10:46 am

4 Comments

Categories: BNET, Green Business, Leadership, Strategy, Sustainability, economy

Tags: Job, President, Times, Obama Administration, Recruitment & Selection, Human Resources, Workforce Management, Stefan Deeran

Times are tough for the Obama Administration. Healthcare reform is on the ropes, partly because the President has acted like a timid politician rather than a leader. Even the President’s pitch to America’s schoolchildren has backfired. And Afghanistan is quickly becoming “Obama’s war.” Add it all up and the news has sent the President’s approval ratings to the lowest levels of his term, currently around 53%.

There is one area where Obama is still given the benefit of the doubt–the nascent green economy.  Obama has promised that millions of green jobs will materialize thanks to his policies, even though the quality and quantity of those green jobs is actually still up for debate.  But all things being equal, green jobs could be great jobs for the economy in the long run.  That’s why the job of Obama’s “Green Jobs” adviser, currently held by the Yale-educated lawyer Van Jones, is so important.

Unfortunately for the Obama Administration, Jones has been dogged down recently by two controversies.  Conservatives have always been skeptical of Jones.  And now they have their ammo.  There’s a tape on the web which catches Jones calling Republicans “a**holes.” And if that wasn’t bad enough, it turns out Jones signed a 9/11 Truth petition which questions whether the Bush Administration allowed the terrorist plot to happen.  Thus far, Jones has apologized for his past and the Obama Administration has weakly supported their green jobs advisor, saying “he continues to work in the administration.”

But as long as Jones works for the White House, entertainers like Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity are going to have a field day with the controversy.

Do you think Jones needs to resign for the sake of the Presidency and the green economy?  Or should the Obama Administration stand up and defend its team?  Share your thoughts below.

Stefan Deeran consults environmental advocacy groups and businesses on their sustainability strategies and communications plans. He also publishes the online newsmagazine the Exception.
 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Bouchart

    09/04/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Can Obama's Green Jobs Czar Deliver After Controversial Comments?

    Green is the next bubble.

  •  
    2

    lildrewxd

    09/05/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Can Obama's Green Jobs Czar Deliver After Controversial Comments?

    there is proof this guy is a self proclaimed communist, that isn't exactly the guy i want in ANY aspect of some of our jobs. And these could potentially be BIG jobs.

  •  
    3

    wwbrock

    09/08/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Can Obama's Green Jobs Czar Deliver After Controversial Comments?

    No, he should not be "forced to resign" we are all entitled to our own opinions and have the RIGHT to express them - remember the 1st amendment! However, it looks like his own poor choice of language and the things he signs onto will give many reason to question his judgment!

  •  
    4

    bnet'r

    09/08/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Can Obama's Green Jobs Czar Deliver After Controversial Comments?

    FYI...He resigned over the weekend. The White House released the news Sunday in the middle of the night.

    Van Jones was more focused on ethniticity than reducing U.S. dependence on foreign oil. I would actually speculate that it wasn't so much the communist comments, Republican name-calling, or even 9-11 conspiracies that brought Van Jones down, but the surfacing racially fueled comments he made in the past that ultimately led to his departure.

    Van Jones was to be in charge of more than $30 billion tax payer revenue. This is equivalent to approximately 1/2 of Goldman Sach's annual revenues, 1/3 of IBM's, and more than Google's by $10B. Regardless of ethniticity, political persuasion, or position on the environmental, can we at least all agree that Van Jones did not have the qualifications or experience required of private sector leaders in charge of this amount of money?

    As for the $30B we plan to pour into Green jobs...Can we at least all agree that reducing U.S. manufacturing and associated jobs by shifting production away from the U.S. to foreign countreis through Cap and Trade will NOT:
    1. reduce consumption patterns within the U.S.
    2. reduce the net impact of pollution on the global environment (if we don't produce it doesn't mean it won't be produced someplace else).
    3. increase the oversite and control over the creation of pollutants/disposal of pollutants (because most countries have far more relaxed standards than the U.S. and U.S. manufacturers spend far more $$ to reduce contaminants and byproducts than those in Asia and other parts of the world).

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement