BNET Insight

BNET Intercom

News and observations from the BNET staff

Should Employers Be Able to Check the Credit Scores of Job Applicants?

August 7th, 2009 @ 12:02 pm

2 Comments

Categories: BNET, Career, Job Search, Workplace, economy

Tags: Credit Score, Hiring, Job, Job Applicant, Recruitment & Selection, Human Resources, Workforce Management, Stefan Deeran

Even though unemployment dipped in July, President Obama’s team has been preparing the nation for ten percent unemployment. It’s obviously a tough time to find a job, so a recent report on hiring trends in the New York Times must come as another blow to unemployed Americans looking to dig themselves out of financial holes:

Once reserved for government jobs or payroll positions that could involve significant sums of money, credit checks are now fast, cheap and used for all manner of work. Employers, often winnowing a big pool of job applicants in days of nearly 10 percent unemployment, view the credit check as a valuable tool for assessing someone’s judgment.

This seems like an invasion of privacy to me.  Why should employers have access to this type of data?  Anyone can hit a rough patch and one’s credit score may have nothing to do with how well one will do the job.  Furthermore, as a BNET feature has noted, different racial and ethnic groups have substantially different credit scores.

Speaking of race and testing, the Supreme Court’s July ruling in the New Haven white firefighter promotion case (perhaps you’ve heard of the appellate judge, Sonia Sotomayor) has some testing advocates excited that they’ll have more legal leeway to use tests during hirings and promotions.

I concede that employers should be able to standardize their hiring processes, and that might, in some cases, involve testing.  However, it seems the testing craze (and the public’s willingness to accept it) has gotten out of hand.  Case in point: PETA is demanding that the NFL force a mental test upon dog-ring kingpin quarterback Michael Vick, who is trying to work his way back into the game after serving 23 more months in jail than any of the crooks at Bank of America ever will.

Stefan Deeran consults environmental advocacy groups and businesses on their sustainability strategies and communications plans. He also publishes the online newsmagazine the Exception.
 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    e1wood

    08/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Should Employers Be Able to Check the Credit Scores of Job Applicants?

    What if you've applied for a Financial Services position, and from your credit report it's obvious that you've hit that rough patch financially....shouldn't they have the opportunity to speak with you about it, to verify that you won't commit FRAUD just to get a sale and make some money? The Wholesale Mortgage industry has been doing Credit reports for years, and it's amazing how many people in the industry have TERRIBLE credit....guess it's like Dr's who still smoke.

  •  
    2

    Joe E S

    08/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Should Employers Be Able to Check the Credit Scores of Job Applicants?

    Using credit scores to screen job applicants is flawed. What's next... employers checking an applicant's grocery discount key card to see what record of foods they eat before determining if they will cost the company more health insurance if hired for the the job? (Insurance companies are actually considering doing this next!)

    It seems we are good at inventing any metric and creating fear around it ... but not good at connecting it in a relevant way... especially to hire quality people.

    Employers should focus on using data that has meaning and value to the employment situation. The question of what reference sources should be used to screen employees has to be based on relevancy to the job. For most jobs, a credit check is not relevant... outside of those in the high positions of security or those the financial industry.

    In fact, the credit check score was originally meant to serve the interests of the credit industry to determine how you use a credit service. It is not even a realistic indicator of someone's hard earned financial status. We all know that your score could be lowered due to how the credit industry views you as profitable to them. People who use credit responsibly and pay their bills every month are not considered valuable by the credit industry... they are a poor source of income to the credit card cmpany because they pay not late fees or penalty fees. People who use credit in this way actually have their scores lowered!

    Your credit card score can be lowered if you do not use the card enough, or if there are too many inquiries made by agencies (like employers) who request credit checks. So for every job I apply to, and for every credit check requested by those employers, my credit score is lowered because of "too many credit checks!" How ridiculous is that?

    We have all heard of stories like this... people who are denied loans while they have no major debts on their record and money in the bank. The "credit check" has become an overblown metric that has spawned fear and a whole industry of so called "credit watch" schemes that do nothing but collect fees from people to allay thier fears of the credit check score. It used to be that credit scores were confined to loans. Now all of a sudden, everyone is fearing their "credit score" for every aspect of their life because the financial industry promotes it that way.

    In this down economy, we can suddenly experience a temporary financial bind suddenly, and make unnusual decisions to pay immediate expenses for our families to survive. In that case, the credit check may or may not be relevant to judge a person's character or suitability for a job.

    Disallow the credit check for job screening. It's not relevant. Do the right thing... pay attention to thier cover letter and resume, and do a proper job screening and reference check. Let's focus on methods to find an employ good people in our companies... not focus on easy and artifically justified ways to screen people out!

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement