BNET Insight

BNET Intercom

News and observations from the BNET staff

Is Mandated Health Coverage a Secret "Weapon" for the Biggest Businesses?

July 1st, 2009 @ 12:36 pm

7 Comments

Categories: BNET, Management, Strategy

Tags: Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Health Care, Vertical Industries, Benefits, Healthcare, Human Resources, Stefan Deeran

It’s not everyday that Wal-Mart and SEIU join forces.  As President Obama takes to the road to pitch his health care reforms in a “town-hall” format, one of America’s biggest companies and one of its largest unions have released a joint statement in favor of employer-mandated health coverage.

There are still questions as to whether the Obama plan will actually mandate coverage and whether small businesses will be exempt.  The US Chamber of Commerce and the National Retail Federation, which claimed it was “flabbergasted” by Wal-Mart’s position, aren’t taking any chances.  They have been vocally opposed to any employer mandate.

Some view Wal-Mart’s position as a possible pr stunt while others see it as a symbolic crack in the “solidarity exhibited by the executive class.” An editorial in Forbes argues it gives the retailer political cover from the “liberal establishment.”

However, there may be another explanation for Wal-Mart’s support.  Here’s the key bit from a statement by James Gelfand, the Chamber of Commerce’s senior manager for health policy:

Some businesses make the decision to use the government as a weapon against their competition.  We do not agree with this method — the government is a blunt instrument and taxes have extreme unintended consequences, negatively affecting the economy as a whole.

Put simply, as Peter Suderman writes on Reason, market leader Wal-Mart can afford to cover its employees while its competition cannot.

Do you think that’s the real reason why Wal-Mart broke rank?  Where do you stand on employer-mandated health insurance?

Photo by Flickr user urbanshoregirl,” CC 2.0.

Stefan Deeran consults environmental advocacy groups and businesses on their sustainability strategies and communications plans. He also publishes the online newsmagazine the Exception.
 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    rjdbnet

    07/02/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Is Mandated Health Coverage a Secret

    Health care ought to be entirely separate from employment. The entanglement is one of the pathologies underlying the crazy, inefficient, haphazard sructure that's choking the country.

  •  
    2

    kjameshall

    07/03/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Is Mandated Health Coverage a Secret

    Agreed RJD. This country (businesses and unions) made a huge mistake tying employment with health care. Give the employees the money and pass laws that say everyone must be covered either by a private or government plan or both. Then, perhaps, citizens can get their own policy and take it with them when they have to go to another state to find employment.

  •  
    3

    rscc99

    07/03/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Is Mandated Health Coverage a Secret

    I agree with Mr. Gelfand. Walmart's "support" for mandating employer provided health care insurance is just another attempt by the retail juggernaut to crush existing and potential competitors.

  •  
    4

    Brett11

    07/06/09 | Report as spam

    Chambers of Commerces are 21st Century Dinosaurs!

    The National Chamber of Commerce has become a mouthpiece and spokesperson for huge special interest campaign contributors to the Republican Party. Rather than focus on the incredibly complex & diverse needs of SMALL and MID-SIZED Businesses, they have brainwashed ALL BUSINESSES in believing that the same old, same old "needs" of BIG BUSINESS are the same needs of Mom & Pop shops across the nation. THEY ARE NOT THE SAME!

    Just like the Blue State Republican "values voters" ... middle class Republicans (read small business owners) often vote AGAINST their own interests, because they buy into a false bill of goods by believing some nonsense about abortion, gun rights, or "big government." Anything that convinces someone to vote Republican is acceptable ... and most local, and all state and national Chambers of Commerce have become fire hydrants of false information, misleading assertions, and illogical reasoning. Their true bottom line? Reduce or eliminate taxes, reduce or eliminate regulation, reduce or eliminate consumer protection laws -- all for multinational corporate profit. They spew out the same non-provable arguments year after year, and are unwilling to truly look at the Big Picture. When was the last time the Chamber of Commerce spoke out AGAINST corporate welfare, the biggest welfare (and socialist program) in the nation? Huge tax credit and government cash (well over $100 Billion in 2008) literally handed to tobacco farmers, Big Oil, Big Pharma, strip mining interests, clearcutting loggers, and manufacturers moving their operations to China (Amway got a huge tax credit payout from the Feds a few years ago to move their operations from Michigan and elsewhere in the US to China... not a peep, not one word from the Michigan Chamber of Commerce).

    Climate Change? Chambers of Commerce response: Can't exist, doesn't exist, liberals are creating it to produce a bigger government. Switch to renewable energy? Sure, agree with it on paper (at least on Chamber brochure applications) but make sure Congressmen vote AGAINST all meaningful legislation to address it. Protect our environment? Fuhhgeddabout it! Anything that addresses water or land or air pollution might cost a big company some $$$, so reframe it as a "land taking" or "excessive government control." Health care? No way, no how ... no matter what suggestions come down the pike, even if Wal-Mart agrees, then Wal-Mart MUST HAVE SOME EVIL AGENDA. But -- if Wal-Mart had supported the standard Republican's views, then by God, the world's largest retailed must be listened to, after all, they're the biggest job provider in the country and they must be listened to!

    Its astonishing how an otherwise smart small or mid-sized businessman can suspend their rational thinking when the Chamber of Commerce takes a position on some issue ... if all a businessman does is vote for their wallet or against some supposed potential tax increase (the mind-numbing, repetitive false boogeyman argument used successfully to SCARE Chamber members into voting Republican), then the children of these non-thinking brainwashed businessmen will enjoy the fruits of their labor in a war-filled, oil-dependent, very expensive world that is hotter, drier, more flood-prone, with national forests, oceans, and our atmosphere ravaged for corporate profit. Oh wait, the Chambers of Commerce tells me to vote Republican, and will stop "Big Government" from reaching their hands into my back pocket. I guess that's far more important.

    This is the TAKE-AWAY from all this: DO NOT JOIN your local Chamber of Commerce, save your dues and invest that into your business or your child's college fund. Just substitute the words "Republican Party" whenever you hear Chamber of Commerce, and you'll see that this once honorable, legitimate, open-thinking organization is simply an outdated, political, special interest group serving the needs of the super-rich. That is, IF YOU STILL have an open mind left ... or do you categorize anyone that has a difference of opinion as a "big-government, big taxes liberal" ... an easy way to truly not think for yourself and let yourself be taken advantage of by guys in much bigger shoes than you? PT Barnum would have a field day with merchants and businessmen who would give the richest man in town their son's best pair of shoes because they were afraid the town council might want to confiscate them to give to a poor person -- at least that's what the rich guy in town said might happen, at his meeting of super-rich guys from across the state, after his super-rich media buddies spread the bogus message throughout the land.

  •  
    5

    danzjeepn

    07/06/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Is Mandated Health Coverage a Secret

    That rant was longer than the article....

  •  
    6

    franks@...

    07/07/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Is Mandated Health Coverage a Secret

    That rant was also a lesson in today's government and media persuasion. Take a hot topic issue, disseminate mis-information with the facts, and saturate the public to the point where it affects and moves the masses to the point where the misinformed masses demand change. Look at Community Reinvestment Act and where that got us. Recently the line was Change we can all believe in. Look where that's brought us. Read the news and every day there is a story of another proposed government takeover. Why are people so willing to give up their liberties and allow government to control more and more of their daily lives? Government is not business nor does it know how to run a business. It knows of only RATIONING and CONTROL. That's the change we are suppose to believe in. Our founding fathers are rolling in their graves.

  •  
    7

    tahlia42

    07/07/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Is Mandated Health Coverage a Secret

    So far no one has mentioned that Walmart has big plans to open health clinics in its stores. This is a case of enlightened self interest.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement