BNET Insight

BNET Intercom

News and observations from the BNET staff

Debunking the Myth of the Star Performer

May 16th, 2007 @ 3:12 pm

5 Comments

Categories: General, Management, Productivity, Research

Tags: Leslie Leite

A new study at the Harvard Business School takes the spotlight off the “top performers” and focuses it on the other folks who make it possible for the star to shine. According to the researchers, “Stars need to recognize that despite their talent, knowledge, experience, and reputation, who they work with really matters for sustaining top performance.”

The real breakthrough is that it isn’t just their immediate team impacting these high performers. It’s their colleagues organization-wide. Companies basing their hiring practices on the assumption that top performers can go from company to company making the same magic happen may be in for a disappointment. The researchers claim:

Our study debunks that myth. Star analysts rely a lot on the quality of the colleagues that their organization provides to sustain top performance. They cannot simply replicate their top performance in any organizational context.

Although the study looked at financial analysts, additional research is looking at different jobs and industries, including top managers at GE.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    mcontois@...

    05/22/07 | Report as spam

    Team Effort

    This is obvious but great to see a study being done to help get the message out. None of us is as smart as all of us. (Japanese proverb) I have done well but I give a lot of credit to my coworkers and supervisors for creating a supportive atmosphere. Individualism as it is now must die. It's time for a more team focused approach meaning we all contribute and the spotlight focuses more on the team than on any individuals. Get rid of egos because everyone can be replaced. It's when we work together that we can accomplish great things that can be beyond ourselves. SYNERGY!

  •  
    2

    leslieleite@...

    05/23/07 | Report as spam

    Teamwork

    Well said. Thanks for the comment!

  •  
    3

    Acerebel

    08/09/07 | Report as spam

    Spot on

    Just read the article behind the link. It's so true! For too long, we've treated the star as "god", working in glorious isolation. Deviating slightly from the main topic here, I'd be interested, as well, to see research that correlates the incidence of "stardom" with "office psychopaths"; I think there may be some revealing findings. So many so-called stars owe their success to quiet, hard-working backroom people, and to being able to (subtly) bully their way to notice and attention. Only the most alert senior management detect these kinds of "stars" without being taken in by them.

  •  
    4

    mcontois@...

    08/10/07 | Report as spam

    NY Times

    There was an article about this in the New York Times some years ago. Enron was a company that hired stars and let them do whatever they wanted. The employees ruled and started projects without upper management's knowledge. The premise of the article was that it was management systems that led to success and not star performers. Organizations need to adopt a customer centric focus.
    Procter and Gamble is an example of an organization that has a very strong customer focus as well as effective management systems in place that enable it to achieve consistent and strong performance.

  •  
    5

    RobertDLewis

    02/15/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Debunking the Myth of the Star Performer

    Now wait a minute. We're discussing research into Wall Street analysts and we're supposed to take it seriously?

    Why don't we follow it up with research into the star performers among Tarot card readers and alchemists?

    When the authors research professions that produce useful results ... engineers, perhaps, or maybe chemists ... I'll take them seriously.

    As it is, I'll just translate "star performer" in their research to "successful self-promoter."

    With that translation, their results are something less than startling.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement