BNET Insight

BNET Intercom

News and observations from the BNET staff

Changing Newsrooms from Within

March 17th, 2008 @ 7:18 pm

7 Comments

Categories: General

Tags: Journalist, Journalism, Editor, Advertising & Promotion, Strategic Planning, Marketing, Strategy, Management, David Weir

The fifth annual State of the News Media report by the Project for Excellence in Journalism, says that “In the last year, the trends reshaping journalism didn’t just quicken, they seemed to be nearing a pivot point.”

The report states that “the biggest problem facing traditional media has less to do with where people get information than how to pay for it…”

No surprise there, but the report does identify a new trend — editorial staffs coming up with innovative business ideas for their companies.

“The newsroom now clearly appears more innovative and risk-taking than the business side of news organizations,” says Tom Rosenstiel, director of the non-profit effort.

This could indeed be evidence of a “pivot point.” Until now, a key differentiator between “old” media and “new” has been the traditional “church-state line” separating the business side from the editorial side.

In the process, reporters, writers, editors have been largely kept away from the Big Table, where the company’s business decisions were made.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the “line,” advertising and business development execs have been discouraged from building relationships with the editors whose creative product they are attempting to sell.

Yet, it is the editors and other content creators who have the closest relationship with the audience that every media company tries to build.

Thus, the report notes that the new initiatives emanating from editorial staffs “represent a significant shift in the conversation…”

The report also includes a survey of journalists, and for the first time, a majority thinks that journalist blogs, public comments and story-ranking, and even citizen posts are all contributing to making journalism better…

Which indeed may represent an attitudinal sea change.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    interestedreader

    03/18/08 | Report as spam

    News coverage

    Interesting post. I believe the report also said that the news agenda is narrowing since the advent of online journalism, with two stories -- the Iraq war and the presidential election -- accounting for some 25% of news last year. Narrowing of the topics covered, as traditional news media shrink staff and new news media can't afford a lot of reporters, is bad, of course. But it's interesting that the topics that dominate online are serious and important ones, as much as frivolous news. After all, recent reports say the Iraq war has virtually disappeared from TV news (while Britney Spears has not)...

  •  
    2

    hotweir

    03/18/08 | Report as spam

    More from the study

    Yes, you are right, the report contains a fascinating content survey that captured this meta-trend of a narrowing of focus within major media. Good point.

    It also states that the major brand news companies are not losing audiences so much as the ability to get them to pay. All of a sudden, old media and new media are right back to square one: What is the business model?

  •  
    3

    hellodavid

    03/18/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Changing Newsrooms from Within

    I always suspected journalists were the entrepeneurial ones. This seems to support their inclusion rather than exclusion defining the business of media.

  •  
    4

    BradGo

    03/18/08 | Report as spam

    Best coverage?

    David -
    So if Iraq and the presidential election are top issues for readers, who do you feel is covering them the best? Online vs. print? Particular reporters doing any in-depth research?

    With such demand, there must be better articles out there than what Google points me to. For Iraq, each day its "x people killed by a roadside bomb" (with no analysis) and for the election it's either an "experience vs. change" article with no analysis of candidate's experience or ability to change, or yet another article on the delegate count (with a typical 'political site' reporting conflicting totals).

    If there are people writing compelling articles, I'd be curious whether they are predominantly still in print media, online sites, or personal blogs.

  •  
    5

    hotweir

    03/18/08 | Report as spam

    Re: Best Coverage?

    Various British news organizations provide the strongest coverage of the Iraq war, IMHO; and I like Josh Marshall's TPM on the Presidential primary coverage. Also, Slate, Salon, HuffingtonPost, and various other alternative sites.

  •  
    6

    julievp

    03/18/08 | Report as spam

    investing in research

    tapping into the editorial side is smart but we need strategic research and development to rethink the business model. i don't think enough of that will happen until a few companies take big risks and are successful. the best thing i've heard recently is that a hearst board member and rupert murdoch reportedly told people to lower profit expectations for papers: http://www.followthemedia.com/fittoprint/bennack13032008.htm

  •  
    7

    twanless@...

    07/23/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Changing Newsrooms from Within

    I think the large number of reporters and writers leaving journalism in droves is probably the most telling fact around this subject. They're voting with their feet.

    They were always more entrepreneurial, but were usually squelched by a conservative culture and management scared to death of change. But most stayed because it was the only -- and the best -- game in town. It no longer is.

    Anyone who has ever worked at a newspaper has a basket of stories about stupid/unimaginative management. The paradox of journalism is that while they're always writing about change, they're the least likely to actually embrace it. So, under pressure, they resort to the least imaginative option -- rampant cost cutting and narrowing of coverage.

    All I see today is the best and brightest getting out as fast as they can because the ship, maddening enough when it was afloat, is now going down.

    Tony Wanless
    Knowpreneur Consultants

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement