BNET Insight

BNET Intercom

News and observations from the BNET staff

Verizon Gets it on File-sharing

March 17th, 2008 @ 11:37 am

1 Comment

Categories: General

Tags: P2P, Internet Service Provider, Story, File-sharing, Peer To Peer (P2P), Internet Service Providers (ISPs), Internet, Kevin Kelleher

Blender magazine recently named the killing of Napster by the major labels the Biggest Record Company Screw-Up of All Time. While that’s hardly news, it is interesting that the title was bestowed in a time when there is evidence that, seven years after Napster was squashed, big corporations are finally getting peer-to-peer (P2P).

On Friday, the Associated Press said Verizon was breaking ranks with major ISPs who are trying to restrict heavy P2P activity, which account for a third of the traffic on their networks. Since last summer, Verizon has collaborated with Yale University and file-sharing software makers to find a way to make file sharing faster, more efficient and cheaper for itself.

The group claims to have found a way to connect users not randomly, as most networks do, but that relied more on local connections. It works even better if other ISPs join in, but that will require them to change their thinking. But with legal file-sharing likely to happen through new services like Hulu, that could change. The story quotes a sofware exec as saying,

“This test signifies a turning point in the history of peer-to-peer technology and ISPs,” said Robert Levitan, chief executive of file-sharing company Pando Networks Inc. “It will definitely show ISPs that the problem is not peer-to-peer technology, the problem is how you deploy it. It is possible to deploy P2P to their advantage.”

Meanwhile, record companies are reportedly warming to a proposal pitched by music-industry consultant Jim Griffin, who argues the best solution to music piracy is a $5 a month surcharge on broadband connections. (More on his views can be found here.) Artists would collect the money based on popularity of their downloads.

Both of these developments inject efficiency into broken business models while making things easier for consumers. Both have been resisted by companies who have suffered self-inflicted wounds from their short-sightedness. But both also suggests companies are learning from their past screw-ups.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Ian P

    03/18/08 | Report as spam

    Why should I pay for file sharing?

    In the UK the Govt. introduced a tax on blank tapes and CD's to pay musicians (in reality the record companies) for illegally copied music. The result, people stopped buying blanks and started downloading from Napster and a host of clones. The tax became a farce.
    Napster was squashed but not the clones so downloading is still free for those that want it.
    I have broadband, but don't download. I don't watch movies or listen to music via the internet.
    So now The music industry wants me to keep them in clover by taxing my access to research facilities and online book buying and the like.
    Why not suggest an increase in fuel prices to offset the cost of the music I listen to via my car radio?
    The 'music industry' really needs to understand its business model and how it will operate in the future without turning to organised crime.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement