Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: You Know the Difference Between Cash and Profit. Right?
Next Post: Reinventing the Boring Business Conference
Posted in:
"Greater availability of cadavers for medical science could accelerate the quality of medical training and procedures -- a fact most users recognize. Nonetheless, how much trust can be put in markets to ensure these outcomes? How should a donor decide between two donation options? What are the logics of such a decision? What does competition for whole-body donations look like? How might this impact other donations? More importantly, perhaps, should programs compete for donations? All these questions require empirical examination."Read Anteby's though-provoking piece on HBS Working Knowledge, A Market for Human Cadavers in All But Name. BTW, a post I wrote on Anteby's gray zone work was one of my most popular (and controversial.) What do you think? Are there some places where market solutions are just inappropriate? Are we ready to think about selling Aunt Tilly's remains to the highest bidder?
posted by Sean Silverthorne
November 6, 2009 @ 7:28 am
Previous Post: You Know the Difference Between Cash and Profit. Right?
Next Post: Reinventing the Boring Business Conference
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.