BNET Insight

The View from Harvard Business

The latest ideas and insights from the minds of Harvard Business.

HBR: Forced Time Off Improves Employee Productivity

September 24th, 2009 @ 7:43 am

11 Comments

Categories: Management

Tags: Employee, Team Management, Handhelds, Management, Hardware, Sean Silverthorne

Professional services employees often put in 60 hours a week at the office and spend the rest of their “free” time tethered to work by an umbilical BlackBerry. The recession has only increased the time people feel they must devote to their work.

But an excellent article in the October issue of Harvard Business Review argues that time off and productivity are not mutually exclusive. In fact, managers have a responsibility to make sure their reports are taking time off to recharge their batteries.

The authors studied workers at the Boston Consulting Group and discovered:

  • 94% of 1,000 professionals worked 50 or more hours a week, with nearly half clocking 65 hours or more. In addition, most put in another 20 to 25 hours a week outside the office thumbing their BlackBerrys.
  • This additional time working was not necessary. The employees could meet the highest standards of service and still have planned, uninterrupted time off.  “Indeed, we found that when the assumption that everyone needs to be always available was collectively challenged, not only could individuals take time off, but their work actually benefited.”
  • Managers must enforce a process for taking time off, encourage discussion about what’s working and what isn’t, promote experimentation with different ways of working, and secure and publicize top-level support.

At BCG, consultants were required to take “predictable time off” requiring them to shut off voicemail and e-mail. “The concept was so foreign,” report Harvard Business School authors Leslie A. Perlow and Jessica L. Porter, “that we had to practically force some professionals to take their time off, especially when it coincided with periods of peak work intensity. Eventually, however, the consultants came to enjoy and anticipate having predictable time off, particularly as the benefits for their work became evident.”

One benefit: Increased communication among team members “sparked new processes that enhanced the teams’ ability to work most efficiently and effectively.”

Read the HBR article, Making Time Off Predictable—& Required.

To learn how BCG employees reacted to the new rules, many are interviewed in this Wall Street Journal piece, If You Need to Work Better, Maybe Try Working Less.

What do you see in your own office? Are people fried, frazzled and frustrated from the grind? What’s being done to lighten their load?

By the way, Perlow, an HBS professor, wrote an earlier piece for HBR titled “Is Silence Killing Your Company. ” She argues that companies can’t afford to have employees who are reluctant to speak up at work, that too many opportunities are lost. Read an excerpt.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    sergeyegue

    09/24/09 | Report as spam

    RE: HBR: Forced Time Off Improves Employee Productivity

    I strongly agree with that. It is not easy to apply it, but it is necessary if one wants to be productive in his work. Thank you very much for that paper.

  •  
    2

    Plotinus

    09/25/09 | Report as spam

    Most efficient work force in the world

    The most efficient work force in the world is found in Norway.
    Here the norm is 37.5 workhours a week and "forced" paid
    vaccation of 5 weeks a year + a lot of holidays. The result is
    that when people are at work, they really do work and they do
    it well because their energy is generally high.

  •  
    3

    DataDude1

    09/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: HBR: Forced Time Off Improves Employee Productivity

    I completely agree. The culture in the US is one of more is always better. This research and a great deal of anecdotal evidence points in the opposite direction. It is not a long stretch to connect this workaholic behavior to the myriad of health issues we face as a country.

    Take a clue and take a break!

    GT

  •  
    4

    ivana235

    09/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: HBR: Forced Time Off Improves Employee Productivity

    I also believe in the above stated, and I have in plan to develop my MA in HR Management thesis in relation to this topic.

    Where I come from, the unemployment rate is high, and working overtime and burning midnight oil became a fashion, and once somebody does it, the others follow in order to compete - or keep their place ("showing their commitment" to the work and the organization).
    I believe that besides the counter-effects it may have on productivity, it also influences job satisfaction, commitment (in the sense it SHOULD imply), quality of personal life, but also - quality of life within the wider community.

    If someone has some literature to recommend in this field -I would be mostly grateful.

  •  
    5

    R. B.

    09/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: HBR: Forced Time Off Improves Employee Productivity

    I very much agree with the results reported in this article. I've seen it play out time and again over a 20+ year career and I think it's shameful and costly in the long term. Unfortunately, in America we seem to believe you are not a committed, productive, team-player unless you are working over 50 hours a week and taking work home with you. A person can do this for a time. But as the years go by, even the strongest contributor and greatest star will wear down, grow tired and, if they continue down this path, they will eventually burn out. Yet corporations pressure employees (often unspoken, via the culture) to give and give some more until the person finally becomes a mediocre contributor because they are fried. Balance in life is critical to continued long-term positive performance, but businesses make it very difficult for an employee to maintain that balance without being devalued and cast aside. Will we ever learn? It doesn't look promising...

  •  
    6

    NewBoots

    09/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: HBR: Forced Time Off Improves Employee Productivity

    I reply to this article for two reasons:
    1. I agree wholeheartedly. Fried, frazzled and frustrated only scratch the surface here.
    2. "umbilical" BlackBerry. What an excellent adjective.

  •  
    7

    johooo

    09/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: HBR: Forced Time Off Improves Employee Productivity

    As some companies say ....

    If you don't come in on Saturday don't bother coming in on Sunday


    This will NEVER change, especially during a down cycle. As the number of chairs declines the scramble for the remaining seats will include all legitimate and illegitimate methods, including maximizing face time and forced but uncompensated overtime

  •  
    8

    btraven

    09/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: HBR: Forced Time Off Improves Employee Productivity

    Reflection on what Americans are "working for" would be a good idea. If your whole life is spent working to the exclusion of friends, community, enrichment, and leisure, what kind of life are you leading? -- especially if you are working for a company, as most are these days, that are perfectly willing to reward your loyal efforts and put you on the street with minimal severance and pension when it is convenient for them. Life really is short and Americans should be up in arms around this basic quality of life issue instead of being passively co-opted in the name of consumerism. Working 12 hours or more days is a massive step back for our best and brightest professionals -- and for what?

  •  
    9

    btraven

    09/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: HBR: Forced Time Off Improves Employee Productivity

    If companies can get 80 hours by pressuring one professional, do you think that they will hire a needed second one? When there is no line of decency and no protection about what to ask of an employee, unemployment will stay high and quality of working life will stay low. Is this a great country or what?

  •  
    10

    Mrs. E

    09/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: HBR: Forced Time Off Improves Employee Productivity

    These studies are done all the time and the results never change; much to the dismay of the CEO's of the companies who ask employees to work more for less. The most "forced time off" we get is in the form of unpaid, "voluntary vacation" time. Our company asks all of us to take unpaid time off at the beginning of every calendar year to save them money. The contrast of this is they do not allow any vacation time to be taken between December 15th and the 31st. In the current ecconomy, most of us are afraid that if we take an actual 2 week long vacation (that we have earned in our benefits), if someone covers our desk for us, they will then replace us. Being laid off is the new forced vacation we cannot afford.

  •  
    11

    seansilverthorne@...

    09/28/09 | Report as spam

    RE: HBR: Forced Time Off Improves Employee Productivity

    Thoughtful comments. "Being laid off is the new forced vacation we cannot afford" from Mrs. E puts it quite well. We are motivated by potential layoffs to work more hours, not less.

    This clearly has to be a top-down initiative in most companies, and I wonder how many bosses are truly encouraging their folks to take more time off in this economy?

    Sean

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Sean Silverthorne Sean Silverthorne is the editor of HBS Working Knowledge, which provides a first look at the research and ideas of Harvard Business School faculty. Working Knowledge, which won a Webby award in 2007, currently records 4 million unique visitors a year. He has been with HBS since 2001. Silverthorne has 28 years experience in print and online journalism. Before arriving at HBS, he was a senior editor at CNet and Executive Editor of ZDNet News.... more »

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement