BNET Insight

The View from Harvard Business

The latest ideas and insights from the minds of Harvard Business.

Protect Your Online Reputation

March 31st, 2008 @ 9:18 am

7 Comments

Categories: Innovation, Marketing, Personal Effectiveness

Tags: Reputation, Wiki, Blogging, Professional Development, Web 2.0, Online Communications, Internet, Career, Sean Silverthorne

In the real world, managing your reputation should be paramount. Showing up on time, being helpful to colleagues, and taking the occasional shower increase the reputation points you can leverage in any number of ways, including career advancement. Many of us spend a lot of time, if not thought, on maintaining our good rep.

If you have a virtual presence, chances are you have an online reputation, too. It’s probably codified in some form. On eBay, I have a 100 percent positive feedback from 46 dealmakers, and my reviews on several consumer sites are considered, in aggregate, “somewhat” useful.

Yet, I don’t put nearly as much time grooming my online reputation as my offline one. Should I?

The answer is, yes I should. And so should you.

John Sviokla has me thinking a little harder about this topic with a new Harvard Online post, Managing Your Reputation in a World of Crowdsourcing. I actually disagree a bit with his premise that the burgeoning world of user generated content is a threat to businesses because it puts reputation at the mercy of the mob. He writes:

The problem with Wikipedia, and blogs, and user generated content is that many of them don’t have a strong reputation management process. Put another way, any idiot can have an opinion.

I believe Wikipedia has quite a strong reputation management process based on peer review, and the overall quality of the content supports that claim. And bloggers gain importance and influence by the quality of their information and thinking — an idiot blogger is likely to influence only other idiots.

Look Out For #1
Where I do agree with John is in his call that businesses, and I’ll add individuals, must get serious about developing and protecting their online reputation.

Reputation is what’s going to save you when a jilted paramour posts that you steal from the church, an angry customer criticizes your firm’s selling practices, and a former employee e-mails around a phony arrest record with your name at the top. Sure, a good attorney can help but, as they say, no one reads the corrections page in the newspaper.

Online reputation also becomes increasingly important with the spread of Web 2.0 and its emphasis on social and business networking. In the real word, your word is your bond. Online, its your Five Star rating that wins you more deals, wider influence, and a bank account of goodwill when that idiot blogger does decides to take a shot.

In other words, investing in reputation maintenance pays off.

Do Unto Others
So what can you do to boost your reputation? Use common sense more than anything.

  • Golden Rule. You don’t determine your reputation — it’s determined by the people you interact with. So to others be fair, transparent, and honest. (And OK, it wouldn’t hurt to encourage satisfied customers to post some love in your direction.)
  • Watch The Watchers. Monitor what others are saying about you and your company. There are lots of firms that will do this for you. Be ready to interact online with a critic when appropriate in an honest exchange. In today’s business jargon, be “authentic”.
  • Perry Mason On Line 1. Sometimes it turns ugly and ultimately defamatory. Know the law and use it if need be. But also understand it’s better to win in the court of public opinion than in the courtroom.

Also, start thinking about how this concept of online identity is going to play out in the next three, five, or ten years. Harvard Business School marketing professor John Deighton believes online identity is something not only to be protected, but will  be something you use to your advantage in online dealings.  He envisions, for example, that consumers who are willing to share personal information will be more attractive to sellers and more sought-after than those who refuse to participate.

How do you build and protect your online rep? Is it important to you? How would you address a competitor casting a stain your character?

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Deborah S

    04/02/08 | Report as spam

    Web of Trust reputation rating system

    There is a website reputation management system already in place called Web of Trust. With 18 million websites rated so far and a thriving community of active users, WOT is positioned to become one of the main mechanisms that uses the wisdom of the crowd (plus hundreds of trusted sources such as phishing reports and spam blacklists) for determining the credibility and reputation of companies and individuals with an online presence.

    The ratings are based on standards of trustworthiness, vendor reliability, privacy and child safety. Mr. Silverthorne???s ???Golden Rule??? applies. Reputation data is recalculated every 30 minutes, so it's fresh. Many Internet users who have used WOT have noticed that the user driven approach gives more accurate ratings than automated ones because WOT provides reputation ratings regarding "vendor reliability" and "child safety", where human input is crucial.

    Mr. Sviokla, in his posting Managing Your Reputation in a World of Crowdsourcing, says one of the three elements of a robust management system is ???a rating mechanism to vet ???high quality??? and ???low quality??? opinions.??? In order to keep ratings more reliable, WOT tracks each user's rating behavior before deciding how much it trusts the user. WOT is not your father's rating system, where each anonymous user has an equal say in reputations. Instead, it's more like http://www.mywot.com/en/blog/2006/9/6??? > a meritocracy where pseudonymous users earn trust by showing rational behavior when testifying. If you are a new user or your behavior is erratic, the system won't trust you.

    http://www.mywot.com/en/blog"> Version 3 of WOT is being released in a few weeks which gives site owners the ability to ???Watch the Watchers.??? A new scorecard gives an at-a-glance overview of the site???s rating and a comments and category section allows users and our administrators to annotate their reasons behind the ratings.

    Deborah Salmi
    Web of Trust

  •  
    2

    Deborah S

    04/02/08 | Report as spam

    Sorry about poor formatting

    Oh goodness...sorry about the terrible formatting I did on my earlier reply. I will try once again to make for easier reading. If it doesn't work, I won't try again. Why, oh why, doesn't BNET offer a preview before?!

    There is a website reputation management system already in place called Web of Trust. With 18 million websites rated so far and a thriving community of active users, WOT is positioned to become one of the main mechanisms that uses the wisdom of the crowd (plus hundreds of trusted sources such as phishing reports and spam blacklists) for determining the credibility and reputation of companies and individuals with an online presence.

    The ratings are based on standards of trustworthiness, vendor reliability, privacy and child safety. Mr. Silverthorne?s Golden Rule applies. Reputation data is recalculated every 30 minutes, so it's fresh. Many Internet users who have used WOT have noticed that the user driven approach gives more accurate ratings than automated ones because WOT provides reputation ratings regarding vendor reliability and child safety, where human input is crucial.

    Mr. Sviokla, in his posting Managing Your Reputation in a World of Crowdsourcing, says one of the three elements of a robust management system is a rating mechanism to vet high quality and low quality opinions. In order to keep ratings more reliable, WOT tracks each user's rating behavior before deciding how much it trusts the user. WOT is not your father's rating system, where each anonymous user has an equal say in reputations. Instead, it's more like http://www.mywot.com/en/blog/2006/9/6?> a meritocracy where pseudonymous users earn trust by showing rational behavior when testifying. If you are a new user or your behavior is erratic, the system won't trust you.

    http://www.mywot.com/en/blog"> Version 3 of WOT is being released in a few weeks which gives site owners the ability to Watch the Watchers. A new scorecard gives an at-a-glance overview of the site?s rating and a comments and category section allows users and our administrators to annotate their reasons behind the ratings.

    Deborah Salmi
    Web of Trust

  •  
    3

    hongell

    04/02/08 | Report as spam

    WOT

    Thank you Deborah. I will check out your security add-on and pass the word - and your link.

  •  
    4

    cindylowther

    04/02/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Protect Your Online Reputation

    I enjoyed this article, it is right in line with my goal for 20087 is to learn to be more polished.
    Thanks and keep them coming!!

  •  
    5

    ninokader@...

    04/02/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Protect Your Online Reputation

    There are firms out there now that do this sort of thing for individuals (ReputationDefender.com) and for companies (International Reputation Management - http://www.ReputationInsurance.com)

  •  
    6

    hongell

    04/02/08 | Report as spam

    Sources and Reputations

    I think Mr. Sviokla makes a good point in his regard to user generated content. In reference to Wikipedia, if they have such a strong reputation management process, why don't some accredited educational institutions' professors allow their students to cite Wikipedia references in formal essay work?

  •  
    7

    csmagg

    04/02/08 | Report as spam

    Managing your online reputation!

    The Internet has quickly become a complex ecosystem where public opinion can be created and disseminated within seconds. Keeping your eyes and ears on the world of consumer generated media can be a daunting task.
    For further insight on this topic, please visit:
    http://www.saastream.com/my_weblog/2008/01/new-years-top-r.html

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here

Blogger Profiles

  • Blogger Thumbnail Sean Silverthorne Sean Silverthorne is the editor of HBS Working Knowledge, which provides a first look at the research and ideas of Harvard Business School faculty. Working Knowledge, which won a Webby award in 2007, currently records 4 million unique visitors a year. He has been with HBS since 2001. Silverthorne has 28 years experience in print and online journalism. Before arriving at HBS, he was a senior editor at CNet and Executive Editor of ZDNet News.... more »

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement