BNET Insight

Where’s the Line ?

Right and wrong in a for-profit world

Nike Marathon Swindle Update

November 7th, 2008 @ 10:17 am

7 Comments

Categories: General

Tags: Nike Inc., Reebok International Ltd., Public Relations, Gender And Diversity, Workforce Management, Training And Certification, Marketing, Corporate Communications, Human Resources, Michael Mattis

arien.jpgA couple weeks ago we reported that at the Nike Women’s Marathon, held October 19 in San Francisco, the training shoe company awarded the first place prize to Nora Colligan of Austin, TX, even though Arien O’Connell, a school teacher from Brooklyn, ran the best time. Nike explained that Colligan was part of its elite group of pros and that the “winner” was to be selected from this group alone. Later, Nike lamely issued a statement saying, in effect, that everyone was a winner.

This didn’t sit very well with BNET readers. In fact, of the 252 people who voted in the poll, 80 percent said that Nike should declare O’Connell the winner.

Nike hasn’t done that. But Nike competitor Reebok has. In a clever bit of public relations bravura, Reebok presented O’Connell with a trophy inscribed with the words “Winner and Heroine of Non-Elite Runners Everywhere,” along with a free pair of shoes each month for a year, T-shirts for the kids in her class, and a $2,500 donation to her school.

Reebok surprised O’Connell by giving her the award at a special ceremony at her Beginning with Children Charter School.

What do you think of Reebok's play?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Have a workplace ethical dilemma you'd like to share and discuss with BNET readers?

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    VT3000

    11/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Nike Marathon Swindle Update

    hehehehhehe! nice one reebok happy

  •  
    2

    dj_mcclaren@...

    11/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Nike Marathon Swindle Update

    Maybe Nike was thinking that "any publicity is good publicity" but it looks like they were trumped. Her accomplishment deserves accolades and their competitor just out did them. Isn't that what marketing departments are for?

  •  
    3

    pekingduck

    11/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Nike Marathon Swindle Update

    I could definitely use a new pair of running shoes every month...just not Reebok wink

  •  
    4

    Nana Yaw

    11/11/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Nike Marathon Swindle Update

    " you were first but not first" haha! nice one Reebok. although it may be seen as cheap publicity, that was really nice.

  •  
    5

    emorite

    11/11/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Nike Marathon Swindle Update

    ....takes the wind out of Nike's sales???...perhaps only marginally, however to the growing segment of informed consumers who want more from their orthopedic brand than an all access pass to the Mall and 'must be seen' nightclubs, Reebok has made a statement...class is class - try coming up with a strategy for that Nike, but then again your brand speaks to those who are afraid of the responsibility of being an 'individual' and sadly, they are in the minority.

  •  
    6

    mykringo

    11/12/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Nike Marathon Swindle Update

    Nike - might'just do it'
    but Reebok 'just did it!!!'

  •  
    7

    JV@...

    11/15/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Nike Marathon Swindle Update

    Nike possible endeared itself to the elite athletes (but I
    doubt it) but Reebok found a way to reach out to and
    engage the other 98% of aspirational athletes who see
    themselves as winners every time they compete.

    Nice Ambush, Reebok!

    JV from l'Attitude in Cairns

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Top Rated
    advertisement
    • Click Here
    • Click Here
    • Click Here
    advertisement
    Click Here