BNET Insight

Where’s the Line ?

Right and wrong in a for-profit world

Is the National Association of Realtors Trying to Monopolize the Industry?

May 28th, 2008 @ 1:31 pm

2 Comments

Categories: Client Relationships, Ethics, Personal Conduct

Tags: National Association Of Realtors, Commission, Industry, Realtor, Sales Force Management, Strategy, Sales, Management, William Baker

The National Association of Realtors reached a settlement with the Justice Department yesterday to offer discount brokers who offer cut-rate commissions — particularly those working on the Internet — access to the multiple listings services that are the backbone of the industry for traditional brokers. The suit charged that the the NAR, which had been blocking their access to these listings, was stifling competition and hurting consumers.

The big question is: can you blame the NAR for doing this? Some predict that the increased competition will now lead to a 25 to 50 percent drop in commissions. This is good for consumers and businesses looking for real estate, but what about the traditional realtors? Was the NAR monopolizing the industry, or just protecting their own? How would you have acted?

Was the National Association of Realtors wrong for blocking discount brokers from accessing the multiple listings service?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Have an opinion on this realtor squabble? Let us know in the comments section.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    tomnettom

    05/30/08 | Report as spam

    NAR

    The National Assoc of Realtors owns the listings. They are an association of Real Estate Professionals who prescribe to a strict code of ethics. Opening up their listings to others just allow real estate people who are unwilling to live up to those standards have access to NAR listings. The NAR does not and never has set commission rates. Those are negotiated between agent and seller/buyer. So, if you don't like the commission rate, negotiate a lower one. As for me, I would only use a Realtor.

  •  
    2

    vanreamer

    05/30/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Is the National Association of Realtors Trying to Monopolize the Industry?

    If I told you all what I really thought, I would be arrested. Anyhow, I like to think that the majority of the Fellow NAR participants have a well defined, strategic and articulate way of imposing their credibility on the masses of people who have no control over their emotions and have no idea what they are embarking on when making such huge decisions (in respect to the collateralized effects of a real property purchase). I am a previous auditor, and had the option of investigating brokers, branches and on-the spot audits for just cause developments. I have seen it all. And I left this illustrious career choice for tha mere fact that less than 20% of the people are decent and ethical; the other 80% which challenged me to the point that I decided to leave. It certainly wasn't worth my time. All the hours and reports (and more death threats than you can shake a 9mm at!) I am happy to say their core strategy is one of questionable authority. I would use a Broker, and then sucessfully seek a real estate attorney for full review of all contracts and documents before siging anything no matter what state I am making the purchase. I hate to use such a broad brush on a limited canvass, but I have a vast wealth of knowledge, and I report what I know... the real facts.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
Top Rated
    advertisement
    • Click Here
    • Click Here
    • Click Here
    advertisement
    Click Here