BNET Insight

The Service Economy

For when customer service is neither friendly nor helpful

Service Standard: Good Start, But Don't Stop There

September 23rd, 2009 @ 6:54 am

Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: Customer Service, Audit, Product Marketing, Customer Relationship Management (CRM), Marketing, Enterprise Software, Software, Julian Goldsmith

The Institute of Customer Service (ICS) has launched an accreditation scheme ServiceMark aimed at raising the bar in customer service. It’s a fine sentiment, but will customers be served better, just because there is a plaque on the wall?

The scheme is built around companies assessing their own customer service levels and demonstrating improvements as a result of the audit. The process involves an external audit and customer satisfaction measurement.

The accreditation process appears to be comprehensive and rigorous. Applicants are audited on a range of factors - corporate culture, staff training and business processes.

There are many good things about this scheme, but a corresponding number of drawbacks too. Drawing attention to good customer service is never a bad thing and demonstrating its relationship with other areas of the business is a sensible approach to something so fundamental to commercial success.

However, I have a couple of reservations about this move:

  • Like many other well-meaning internal excellence projects, such as Investors in People, the temptation is there to make the effort while the audit is being done and then slide back into bad habits once the accreditation is achieved.
  • Even if a company sticks to its pledges, there’s also a danger that the new processes are set in stone and no further action is taken to improve customer service subsequently.
  • Most importantly, having an accreditation scheme suggests there are universal truths by which all customer service can be measured. This can’t be the case. One style of customer service for a street-corner car mechanic won’t fit the bill for an international investment bank.

At the end of the day, I can’t fault the ICS for implementing this scheme. Anything that addresses the deplorable state of customer service in this country deserves to succeed, as long as this accreditation carries the rider that this is only the start of a long journey, not the finish-line.

(Pic: Josh Parrish cc2.0)

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    duncan baker

    09/24/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Service Standard: Good Start, But Don't Stop There

    Thank you for your review of ICS ServiceMark. If I might respond to your reservations.
    Firstly, the temptation for organisations to raise their game to gain recognition, only to slip back once the award has been made.
    It is for precisely this reason we included in ServiceMark a three stage process including an asssessment of internal procedures: the voice of the customer - an element that makes ServiceMark unique. This can be via an organisation's own customer satisfaction survey, if it meets strict criteria, or by the Inititute's own UK Customer Satisfaction Index, the biggest survey of its kind in the UK. Finally an independent assessment. Successful organisations then have to meet benchmark scores for customer satisfaction in each of the next two years before a full review the following year.
    The danger of processes being set in stone.
    We share your views of this problem and for that reason ServiceMark has been moulded around our world class customer service model which requires have in place the right people, processes, systems and strategies and underpinning customer-focused culture in place. It is not a tick box approach but a deep seated review of the whole of an organisation's service delivery from both a strategic and an operational viewpoint.

    Thirdly, we would take issue with your view that there are no universal truths to customer service excellence. We believe there are - and although some tailoring might be required between a large multinational and a small, family-owned business the basic tenets apply. Indeed, we are introducing a version of ServiceMark for the small business market in the near future.

  •  
    2

    dunx.bee

    09/28/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Service Standard: Good Start, But Don't Stop There

    Surely 'Service' can only be 'judged' by making the process open
    to all users (of the actual service).

    Will there be an open universal reporting system for users to
    feedback service levels?

    On-line and by telephone??

    what will the levels be?

    0 stars to 5 stars?

    Good
    Bad
    Really bad
    Really really bad

    ???

    I am soooo used to getting bad service and being palmed off to
    an automated call center/queueing system, I feel that it's
    become the norm.

    Were has all the service gone??? I always make a point of
    commenting if I receive good or bad service (to the owners of
    the company if possible - if you own a business but employ
    people who give YOUR customers bad service - you are to
    blame. Also if you employ people that give GOOD service you
    should know for performance/reward review).

    Companies/business owners that neglect their customers DON'T
    deserve customers.

    We shouldn't stand for bad service any longer... It is becoming
    ever easier to jump over the fence to a competitor, companies
    (on the whole) need to work a lot harder at (even) basic levels
    of service.

    Not sure if:
    '...via an organisation's own customer satisfaction survey...'

    Will give a REAL picture of service...

    also:

    '...a version of ServiceMark for the small business market in the
    near future...'

    This is fundamental. Only when small business that usually offer
    a better more personal service are able to compete more evenly
    with larger more faceless organisation will we see REAL
    CUSTOMER VALUE and REAL SERVICE LEVELS...

    Maybe ServiceMark should suck in reviews from other online
    portals/feedback mechanisms to allow a fully coloured picture of
    service.


  •  
    3

    Dom Monkhouse, PEER 1

    09/30/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Service Standard: Good Start, But Don't Stop There

    "...universal truths by which all customer service can be measured. This can't be the case."

    Frankly - that's just plain wrong. There ARE universal truths about customer service and if the ICS audit seeks them out then it will be a step forward.

    For example, I can't for the life of me see how great customer service can be delivered by staff who hate or even just aren't enjoying their jobs. So, if the ICS seeks to measure staff engagement this is a great precursor to ensuring client delight. Note - delight! If the objective is to deliver customer satisfaction, you're wasting your time - and believe me you will attain your goal of delivering a mediocre service if you are a local garage or a global bank.

    Firstly, hats off to any firm for going through the audit process. It means they want to improve and are seeking to benchmark their performance - THIS IS A KEY STEP! Without a benchmark you have no idea where you are on the journey. As I am not a journalist, I am not genetically prone to see the world through a more than half empty glass. I take a less cynical view and as 95% of firms don't do anything serious to improve customer service applause to those that do.

    As a consumer it's a shame more companies don't try harder to delight, as every day I am subjected to mind-blowingly crap customer service experiences. Only yesterday I called the Orange call centre and in the end lost the will to live after 20 minutes on hold - a great example of denial of service. What did I want to do? I wanted to edit the account name. No reason to force me to do this with a person - I should have been able to do this via the account portal but you can't because it can't, nor can I email them my request because this isn't an option. Result - spectacular Orange failure to understand its customers and the service they really want.

    Here we are in 2009 and ten-years since it first re-wrote the rulebook, Amazon is still a guiding light on how to deliver online customer service. Others still can't see the light or can't find the will to follow.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here