BNET Insight

The Corner Office

Taking on the big questions facing CEOs, boards, and shareholders.

Treasury's "Debt Czar:" Too Much Power in the Hands of One

September 22nd, 2008 @ 11:39 am

6 Comments

Categories: Best Practices, Corporate Governance, Executive Focus, Finance, Political Economy, Regulation, Shareholder Activism, Strategy

Tags: Agency, Law, Mortgages, Advertising & Promotion, Finance, Capital Structures, Marketing, Peter Galuszka

czar.jpgSome of the reasons why Wall Street ended up in its meltdown mess involve little or no oversight of some of the financial instruments it was creating.

Mortgages were approved willy-nilly over the past few years. Debt was securitized into fancy products. But investors had no real idea of whether the mortgages were good or bad and could not assess actual risk.

So, when there’s a solution proposed, such as the $700 billion bailout law that would give the Secretary of the Treasury incredible powers to buy bad debt, you’d think there’d be some kind of oversight.

Not!

Consider this from Section 8 of the draft law:

“Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to this authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion and may not be reviewed by any court of law or administrative agency.”

Henry Paulson or whoever ends up as treasury secretary can disperse up to $700 billion to anyone he or she wants. Nobody can so much as peep about it. You can’t haul anyone to court. You can’t blow the whistle to any government regulator.

It sounds like my homeowners’ association.

Congress will be under enormous pressure this week to pass this law drafted by Paulson, Federal Reserve head Benjamin Bernanke and their staffers. If they don’t, they will be blamed with throttling the American economic system.

The conventional wisdom at the moment is that without a bailout program sort of like a Resolution Trust Corporation, we’ll be in the soup as thickly as the Great Depression or Japan in the 1990s.

But I squirm when I think about giving one individual or institution that much power.

Have a tidbit of executive wisdom you would care to share with fellow BNET readers?

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Lux131313

    09/23/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Treasury's "Debt Czar:" Too Much Power in the Hands of One

    Well, democracy/separation of powers hasn't done such a great job lately from a fiscal perspective. Maybe too many cooks in the kitchen? I say give it a shot.

  •  
    2

    restoretesting

    09/23/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Treasury's

    I heard an interview with N Gingrich saying we need to slow way down and review this decision. I also like some of Ron Paul's comments. I think it is time to stop living beyond our means as a nation. Let's pay the bills (deficit) and figure this whole mess out. (this comes from someone in healthcare not finance. I'm just mad as hell)

  •  
    3

    Karen J.

    09/23/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Treasury's

    You're right on the spot, this time!


    A gigantically complex program, funded by already-strained taxpayers, thrown together over one weekend by people with clearly-vested interests in the industry involved, and NO OVERSIGHT and NO RECOURSE???


    This is definitely "lighting a match to see how big the puddle of gasoline is"!


    Lux131313 ~ This isn't about democracy or separation of powers! Perhaps, the government should do "something" about the current crisis, and about averting the next one, but this bailout plan is definitely not the right "something"!

  •  
    4

    Fedja Hvastija

    09/23/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Treasury's

    I know I'm stretching into the absurds here,
    but after reading article 8, who says he won't
    just give all the money to himself? What can
    anyone do about it?
    The very notion that any activity in the
    country, governmental or otherwise, seems to
    defy the concept of "civilized society". If the
    US government has shown anything in the last 8
    years, it's that it doesn't believe that its
    purpose is to serve the people. It has shown
    that the people are there to serve the
    government, but this is a new and baffling
    level of such policy.
    If this bill passes, the economic consequences
    may be irrelevant. The US society will be much
    like a marriage stained by adultery. While it
    may function on a superficial level, the very
    core of its existence will be eroded beyond
    repair, until an eventual revolution tears the
    fabric of the society down to its foundations
    and attempts to rebuild it.

  •  
    5

    boatleak

    09/25/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Treasury's

    Should this debacle of a bill pass unfettered it will be evident to many that policy in Washington is set from Wall Street through the Treasury and Federal Reserve. Main street does not need the ability to access more credit....we are over burdened with it. This is nothing short of fear mongering and an attempt to maintain middleclass slavery

    WE SHOULD CALL WALL STREET'S BLUFF!

  •  
    6

    khatibsayed

    09/27/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Treasury's

    Actions are more effective and all matters happened as ethics were missed.

    Pls refer to Irving Fisher (G.Economist)
    He exepected the crisis 100 years ago.

    Egyptian Economist

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here