BNET Insight

The Corner Office

Taking on the big questions facing CEOs, boards, and shareholders.

U.S. Carmakers to Candidates: Bail Us Out

September 5th, 2008 @ 9:47 am

5 Comments

Categories: Economy, Executive Focus, Global Trade, Management, Political Economy

Tags: U.S., Ford Motor Co., Manufacturing, Peter Galuszka

bail_out.JPGAmerica’s traditional car makers have been lobbying hot and heavy this political season at the Denver and St. Paul conventions.

They’re throwing around their political clout (car-heavy Michigan and Ohio have 37 electoral votes) to convince the presidential candidates, not to mention the U.S. Congress, to cough up $50 billion in subsidized loans so they can retool their production facilities. Actually, they might want an additional $50 billion for a cool $100 billion.

The loans would be part of a federally-mandated program to get vehicles up to 35 miles per gallon by 2020. General Motors, Chrysler and especially Ford have been suffering through some of their worst sales ever because they stuck with big, bulky, gas-guzzling SUVs, pickups and sedans. They were all hot sellers in the 1990s but when clear signs of an energy crunch came, they were slow to respond.

Tell me about it. I was on the floor of Ford’s truck plant in Norfolk, Va. back in 2003 just after the firm had put it hundreds of millions to retool the 78-year-old plant so it could churn out moreĀ fast-selling F-150 pickups. And a few years before that, I was at a Ford factory in Ohio that made special engines for Tauruses. Demand was so strong that special trains raced the engines from Cleveland to Kansas City overnight so Tauruses could go through final assembly.

Well, Ford shut down Norfolk about a year ago. I’m not sure what happened in Cleveland, but I gather that at least part of its sprawling manufacturing in the area has been shuttered.

So now, after slogging around like the dinosaurs they are, the Big Three want public money to save them from their bad decisons.

Reminds me of another issue: I once was at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington talking about auto bailouts. An official quietly told me that there’s a little problem with that. Toyota and Honda, which also are Chamber members, employ thousands of U.S. workers in their U.S. plants and don’t need bailouts. Indeed, Asian car makers started outselling the Big Three in the U.S. a few months ago.

Maybe Obama, McCain and Congress should avoid the bailouts. Instead, they should propose some kind of tax credit so that the Big Three officials, starting with their CEOs and C-Suites, can get retrained in anticipating market trends. That and better flexible manufacturing might do the trick.

(Image by Leonard John Matthews, CC 2.0)

Have a tidbit of executive wisdom you would care to share with fellow BNET readers?

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    stonewalla

    09/08/08 | Report as spam

    RE: U.S. Carmakers to Candidates: Bail Us Out

    Excuse me... Clear signs of an energy crunch came in the 1970's. This is what initially opened the door for the Asian car makers in the U.S. The mandated mpg rate should have been slated for 1980 instead of 2020. Bail 'em out? I say let 'em go down for being stupid and greedy! We got fat and happy after WWII and let quality and common sense dissipate. A gentleman by the name of W. Edwards Deming tried to encourage American companies to implement quality management principles, but no one listened. In 1950 he visited Japan and they listened. Twenty years later their products were flooding our markets, which was the beginning of the end for American industries. In 1980, NBC broadcast Deming's story, "If Japan Can, Why Can't We?". Only then did American companies consider quality... too little, too late. That should be the new American Motto!

  •  
    2

    sbrennaman354

    09/08/08 | Report as spam

    RE: U.S. Carmakers to Candidates: Bail Us Out

    Let?s face it. The problems at the big three are real and need to be addressed quickly. Unfortunately tough decisions have to be made and I am afraid the leadership in these firms, the unions and congress are unwilling or unable to make the hard decisions. Decades of entrenched union and Congressional leadership focused not on the labor union membership or congressional constituency, but focused on their own position within their hegemony. It is easy for a union president to say strike when his salary is untouched or diminished as a result of the strike. The senator/congressman panders to that portion of the constituency that will best assure his/her continued position in the legislature. Neither of these groups really wants change especially if that change diminishes or negates their influence (power). Someone needs to make the tough decisions. The corporate management groups have the money and prestige and do not want to lose it. Maybe we need more people like Mike Lockhart (Armstrong) who can and will make the tough decisions even if it means a legacy giant goes under. After all, we do live in a capitalistic form of economy where only the fit SHOULD survive.

  •  
    3

    pgaluszka

    09/08/08 | Report as spam

    RE: U.S. Carmakers to Candidates: Bail Us Out

    Sbrennerman raises good points. The old mode of handling benefits,including health care for retirees, is a crucial factor in the weakness in the U.S. car industry. It is pointless to bash the unions over this, since they were acting in what was appropriate for the time and place.
    One problem is that other countries, such as Japan, have entirely different forms of health care. Ours is a for-profit, managed care system that is highly expensive and does not cover everything or everybody. Yet, any challenge to it is mashed by vested interests.
    No, it's not a level playing field. I blame management, however, for not realizing the dangers and not changing fast enough.
    Now we have enother big bailout-Freddie and Fannie. I'll blog on that soon.

    Peter Galuszka

  •  
    4

    sbrennaman354

    09/08/08 | Report as spam

    RE: U.S. Carmakers to Candidates: Bail Us Out

    Pete is correct. Union leaders are representing the unions memebers as best as they can, albeit to their detriment at times. Managemtn (Boeing currently) almost always yields so the problem gets bigger and more difficult to solve without paina cross hte board. God helps us if Congress actually tries to fix it.

  •  
    5

    KarenCaren

    10/03/08 | Report as spam

    RE: U.S. Carmakers to Candidates: Bail Us Out

    With the US economic crisis right now. Candidates should help car makers to get more productions. Also I think all business should be help out. Auto parts sellers are suffering from this problem. I'm also suffering from this problem since I want to get a engine performance chips for my car.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement