BNET Insight

The Corner Office

Taking on the big questions facing CEOs, boards, and shareholders.

Sarbanes-Oxley in Retrospect: Fear and Loathing

July 10th, 2008 @ 9:34 am

2 Comments

Categories: Board Management, Compensation, Corporate Governance, Finance, Regulation, Tips and Tools

Tags: Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Compliance, Sarbanes-Oxley, Regulatory Compliance, Regulations, Government, Financial Accounting, Finance, Human Resources, Policies And Procedures

SEC Commissioner CoxBy 2005, it was clear that Sarbanes-Oxley wasn’t exactly popular. SOX was being blamed for everything from putting companies out of business to forcing foreign firms to seek capital in non-U.S. markets.

The most serious and believable criticisms surrounded SOX’s notorious Section 404 which called for internal and external audit attestations. In 2002, Congressional staffers predicted it might cost firms about $500,000 a year, but actual bills went much higher, at least in the early stages.

Wall Street experts complained that SOX and Section 404 were hurting capital markets. One favorite factoid was that in 2005, out of 24 firms seeking more than $1 billion on global capital markets, 23 were not registered in the U.S. The suggestion was that the firms deliberately avoided registering as U.S. firms because they loathed SOX’s restrictions. However, the New Yorker magazine pointed out that some of the largest companies seeking a lot of capital on that list were state-owned ones in China who couldn’t register as American firms anyway.

The clamor kept growing. It was part of the reason for the departure of Securities & Exchange Commission chair, Williams Donaldson, who was replaced by Christopher Cox, an affable conservative Republican representing California’s Orange County. Donaldson had been seen as not being pro-business enough and occasionally voted with the two Democrats on the SEC commission. At first seen as a push-over for business, Cox proved to be more of his own man.

One of Cox’s most important missions was to ease the harsh implementation of SOX while trying to keep its intent intact. He worked to change some of the rules involving auditing to be more principles-based rather than strictly rules-based.

Perhaps his most significant campaign was to push for series of delays for full SOX compliance for small public firms with market caps of less than $75 million (the actual limit has changed several times). This was done so they could marshal their finances and take more advantage of the experience larger firms that had gone through the SOX compliance process.

Yet Cox disappointed the hard-chargers in the business community who thought he might push for exempting smaller firms completely from SOX regulation. He did not and the gnashing of teeth would continue for a few more years.

Next: SOX comes of age

(Image courtesy SEC.)

Like what you’ve read here? Hate it? Think BNET can be better? Let us know! Email us directly, or take the Help Us Build a Better BNET poll on BNET Intercom.

Have a tidbit of executive wisdom you would care to share with fellow BNET readers?

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    bancoiicom

    07/17/08 | Report as spam

    Fear of Sarbanes_Oxley

    There are other problems to be listed in the US apart from Sarbanes-Oxley. For example, that the US wants to extend its regulation when the company is from the US, although all the activity is outside the US. We will see in the future more listed activite outside the US.

    Very good article, very instructive.

    Salvador Trinxet
    CEO
    Banco Internacional de Investimentos
    www.bancoii.com

  •  
    2

    jeffreylam

    07/19/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Sarbanes-Oxley in Retrospect: Fear and Loathing

    I think it is important for applying SOX to exterprise
    government and IT government in China . It is a better way to protect enterprices benefits.

    Jeffrey Lam (CISA ,CGEIT )

    email: linjinfeng@gmail.com

    Beijing.China

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here