BNET Insight

The Corner Office

Taking on the big questions facing CEOs, boards, and shareholders.

The Budweiser Wars: Where's Lou Dobbs?

July 7th, 2008 @ 11:22 am

5 Comments

Categories: Board Management, CEO Succession, Corporate Governance, Mergers, Regulation, Shareholder Activism

Tags: Takeover, A-B, InBev, Corporate Governance, Blogging, Investment, Financial Services, Financial Accounting, Business Operations, Corporate Law

anheuser_busch_logo.jpgMaybe I’ve missed it, but I have been waiting for CNN pundit Lou Dobbs to weigh in on the foreign invasion of an American icon – Budweiser beer.

After finding its initial $65 a share bid for Anheuser-Busch Companies rebuffed, InBev SA, the Belgian-Brazilian brewer of such tipples as Stella Artois and LaBatt Blue, has taken the neutron bomb approach. They announced Monday they were seeking the ouster of A-B’s entire board so they can replace it with a group of business experts and Adolphus Busch IV, uncle of A-B CEO August Busch IV.

The play may lengthen the time for the now-hostile takeover, but it still could happen. CEO August Busch has urged shareholders to dis the $46.35 billion offer, saying it undervalues the company.

InBev wants A-B so it can gain a major footprint in the U.S. while it pushes beer in faster-growing markets such as China and Russia.

Since Bud is as American as mom, apple pie and Chevrolet, some have taken a nativist stance against the takeover. The governor of Missouri, where A-B is based, is dead set against foreign ownership of arguably his state’s best-known corporation.

Too bad this is not France, writes Steven M. Davidoff, a professor at the University of Connecticut School of Law, in a New York Times blog. If it were, A-B would be like French firm Danone, which could be designated a “national champion” preserved from foreign takeover.

That should be music to the ears of Nativist-in-Chief Lou Dobbs, who has spoken out against a British hedge fund gaining seats on U.S. railroad CSX. But I have not seen much comment from Dobbs on this one. Have you? And what’s your view?

Have a tidbit of executive wisdom you would care to share with fellow BNET readers?

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    hongell

    07/07/08 | Report as spam

    Budweiser, Hostile Takeovers, and Lou Dobbs

    It is surprising that you would be wondering where Lou Dobbs is on this issue; if Budweiser is American as you say. It appears you are looking for .... support and guidance. I can see why. Big business practices, special interest groups, lobbyists loyal to big business (practices), elitist attitudes, and government catering to these groups is a huge cause for concern for everyone; certainly, but do you really need to ask what Lou Dobbs' take or stance is on this issue?

    Forget about Lou Dobbs for a second and ask John Q. Public what he thinks about it. It might go like this: Hey John, what do you think about [insert country here] buying AB and brewing your Budweiser beer? What do you think John's response would be? I don't think it would be nice and I'm sure Lou would agree.

    What kind of conclusion did you come to?

  •  
    2

    gentlereader

    07/08/08 | Report as spam

    RE: The Budweiser Wars: Where's Lou Dobbs?

    Belgian beer is held in high esteem. It can only improve the product.

  •  
    3

    vrsarti

    07/08/08 | Report as spam

    RE: The Budweiser Wars: Where's Lou Dobbs?

    Car companies, stock exchanges, medical companies, airlines all have foreign partnerships and foreign ownership. Not sure what makes beer so special.

  •  
    4

    msalvatini

    07/08/08 | Report as spam

    RE: The Budweiser Wars: Where's Lou Dobbs?

    Interesting to note the take over cabal includes the CEO's uncle...sounds like someone was left out of the succession planning and isn't happy.
    What value is there to taking over the company for the buyer? Pumping other brands through the Bud distribution network in the US(high); getting better returns for the shareholders(?). Bud's results seem to show it to be well managed.
    I always ask why to these kind of efforts? What value will be added by the takeover to the shareholder, employees, consumers? Nothing that I can see. To the buyer it boils down to massive distribution system to push other products; push an international brand to other countries Bud isn't in (I would think Bud mgmt would expand to where they thought it prudent..maintain brand and quality recognition).
    If you look at other many other industries a previous poster noted, these were businesses or sectors in trouble or badly managed. This is different.
    I'd like to seem them offer money for Old Milwaukee, Schlitz, Keystone or Iron City!
    Maybe the Belgian contingent just wants to attend NASCAR events for free;-)

  •  
    5

    CustomComputers

    08/15/08 | Report as spam

    RE: The Budweiser Wars: Where's Lou Dobbs?

    OH PETER,

    Please Please! You got readership using one reference to Mr. Dobbs. Is it neccessary to try that ploy again?

    Write about Beer or Railroad Investment but leave Mr. Dobbs good name out of the equation. He does a great service to informing Americans.

    Will you do likewise?

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement