BNET Insight

Big Think

Game-changing ideas from new business books and other sources of inspiration.

When Incentives Fail

March 10th, 2009 @ 12:00 pm

13 Comments

Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: Incentive, Alfie, Sales Force Management, Sales, Michael Fitzgerald

Do incentives really work? We’ve seen a spate of behavioral economists arguing incentives do, and encouraging companies and government to offer incentives, or ‘nudges,’ to promote behaviors.

A reader, Peter A. Hunter, sends this review ofPunished by Rewards,” Alfie Kohn’s 1999 book arguing that incentives often fail. He notes:

Alfie tells us one story about a scheme sponsored by Pizza Hut in North America to encourage children to read.
He tells us that in order to encourage literacy, children were promised a pizza for every book that they read.
On the surface it sounds perfectly laudable until you examine the detail of what actually happened.
These children instead of being encouraged to read, now saw books as obstacles between themselves and a pizza, and that the obstacle had to be surmounted as quickly and with as little effort as possible.
Thus instead of finding joy in the act of reading, the books these children read were selected by them on the basis of how thin they were and the size of the typeface so that they could qualify for their free pizzas as quickly as possible.

As Alfie notes, instead of encouraging children to develop an interest in books, this programme produced “fat kids who couldn’t read.”

The reviewer acknowledges that it’s difficult to get the argument without reading the book. But, it does fit in with at least some recent research.

For instance, the work of Carol Dweck, outlined nicely in this piece, How Not to Talk to Your Kids.

She’s found that telling kids they’re smart can actually prevent them from reaching their potential. They think that smart means everything should be easy, and they struggle when things aren’t.

I’m not exactly sure how Kohn’s treatment of incentives compare to the idea of a nudge, which is a less direct incentive. I haven’t read the book. But the reviewer warns “be prepared to discover that almost all of the things that you ever considered to be good management practice, are not.”

Tell me what you think.

Know of a good business read you'd like to share with your fellow BNET readers?

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    stevewillson

    03/12/09 | Report as spam

    RE: When Incentives Fail

    So the real question is "Do incentives work to produce the results you desire?"

    The debate in Canada right now is whether or not to offer a major incentive ($3,500) to encourage people to give up their 10+ year old cars and by new cars. There are potentially a number of benefits to this, greener, safer, job creation, etc. The question to my mind is: do we want to continue the same type of behavior that led to this mess in the first place? We cannot build a sustainable society based on continually increasing consumer spending. We don't NEED all that stuff!

    Just one guy's perspective.

  •  
    2

    jsargent

    03/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: When Incentives Fail

    - Not everybody is motivated by the same incentives.

    Using a pizza to encourage child was completely inappropriate since children do not think like adults. You do not tell children they are smart without saying "if you continue the way you are going you are going to do well but the more you learn the harder it will get". Children need to know the consequences of reading/not reading books.

    - In my experience positive insentives work and negative insentives fail. Sometimes employers give negative incentives that encourage teams to be disfunctional.

    - If an incentive is implied then the goal-posts should never change before reaching the target. After reaching the goal the reward must be given. Failing to live up to your words will have a negative effect in the future rendering the same incentive as a liability and may actually reduce production.
    In addition, reputation of the person giving the incentives will be damaged and future incentive scheme will take a long time to be effective.

  •  
    3

    Jim__Johnson

    03/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: When Incentives Fail

    I read and was amazed by Alfie's book soon after publication. He attacks the most sacred cow in management and puts the careers of many compensation specialists at risk. happy

    His message needs some nuance I believe.

    He doesn't say contingent rewards have no effect--they have often too much effect or unintended consequences.

    Often the unfortunate result is people focusing only on the tangible reward and ignoring collateral damage and/or ceasing to get any "psychic" return from the work. E.g., kids don't learn to like reading, they just do it for the goodies.
    In work settings there is some indication of the same effect. I suggest the large research compilation of Edward Deci and Richard Ryan of U of Rochester (Why We Do What We Do, 1995). They have studied intrinsic vs extrinsic rewards for several decades and their findings tend to corroborate Kohn's. Interestingly, I have never found reference to Kohn in Deci's work or such comp luminaries as Lawler, Kerr etc.

    The research on cognitive dissonance is also relevant here and sometimes confirms and sometimes disagrees with Deci and Kohn.

    Bottom line--the interaction of rewards, behavior, common sense, and task commitment is not straightforward.

    As an organizational effectiveness consultant, I'd suggest that 1) people not use incentives in a simplistic way or consider it narrowly focused instrument and 2) look at the "rewards" for doing a particular job as a whole--intrinsic and extrinsic balanced to fit the job, worker, context.

    Too much extrinsic reward causes people to behave more like hungry dogs intent on getting to a piece of steak without regard for life or limb. In organizations, perhaps this means cutting corners (ie, taking a risk) because the reward is large enough to make it a reasonable trade-off.

    Balanced scorecard models can offset this risk to some extent if workers are held accountable for an array of outcomes that to some extent constrain each other. For example, goals are set for profitability but also revenue growth, process improvement, customer retention and employee commitment/retention, regulatory compliance.

    That said, it is hard to imagine most for-profit organizations devoid of incentive pay systems of some sort.

  •  
    4

    clarkm

    03/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: When Incentives Fail

    The incentive isn't the problem in the article's example, the problem is in it's implementation and execution. Pizza Hut shouldn't be directly encouraging children to read and I don't believe that was the company's intent. The incentive was for the parents; offering a savings on a meal if they encourage their child to read. Pizza Hut wants to SELL pizza not give it away. If they can get you in their store for the free child's pizza, hopefully you'll bring the family and buy a meal as well.

    But sadly, we have become a lazy society. People expect society to raise their children for them. (Why not, they've been told it takes a village to raise a child. They didn't actually read the book but heard it on television.) The fat kid who can't read probably has fat parents that can't read either. And they look to Pizza Hut to do their parenting for them, then blame the company for making them fat. And some social science twit blames the incentive and rights an article suggesting that they don't work. I know that my child worked hard to get his pizza's, we chose the reading material. I was actually quite surprised at how hard he was willing to work to get a silly pizza.

    Failure to gain the desired result does not suggest incentives, in general, are not effective but rather, that the implementor didn't employ them correctly. Alfie oversimplified the issue to support his argument. Just another blame game to justify the stupid behavior.

  •  
    5

    ndaddezio

    03/13/09 | Report as spam

    Better example

    A better example of this is explained in Steven Leavit's Freakonomics where a school tried to implement a fee for parents who did not pick up their children on time.

    Instead of reducing the number of tardy parents the fee actually encouraged more parents to leave their children at the school. Why? Because the penalty had eliminated the "guilt" factor. Parent's now felt that it was perfectly acceptable to leave their children at the school so long as they were willing to pay the minmal penalty fee for doing so.

    Just another example on how incentives can backfire.

  •  
    6

    rstotz

    03/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: When Incentives Fail

    The common thread in this string and in most of the research I have seen on incentives is that 1) they do affect behavior, 2) that poorly designed or implemented, incentives can yield unintended consequences, and 3) one needs to delve more deeply into the research before making a claim for or against the use of incentives.
    An example is the research presented by the ACA Journal (Vol6, No.4)entitled: Rewards, Interest and Performance: An Evaluation of Experimental Findings. This study utilized a meta analysis of 100 studies to gain a better insight into the use of incentives and found that many of the individual studies (including A Kohn's)did not reflect the findings of this larger data base.
    For over 25 years I have shared my experience with incentives which can be summed up by: "incentives are like fire - they can keep you warm or burn you".
    It is not incentives per se, it is how they are used or mis-used. Too often poorly designed and implemented plans get the blame for what the plan designer/administrator/etc. did or failed to do.

  •  
    7

    majorstu

    03/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: When Incentives Fail

    Paraphrasing Napoleon, it's amazing what some people will do for a bright colored piece of cloth. I began reading Kohn's book and have struggled to get through it. Maybe someone should offer me a pizza! I have also encouraged my kids to read with the Pizza Hut program. There are multiple parameters at play. The intrinsic reward of completing a task becomes self-limiting if there is no compensation attached to it, like a conditioned response.
    On the other hand, denying a promised reward, e.g. changing the rules, is always damaging, so one must always be cognizant of that aspect. I still recall an overnighter that we pulled to finish a demo for a client. The boss said she'd take us all to dinner and margaritas after the presentation. She moved up the ladder not long after that and the promise wasn't fulfilled. That was ten years ago, we're all still waiting, and many of us have left the company. Anecdotal, yes, but it stays in the memory.
    One axiom to remember is that people emulate the behavior that they see which gets rewarded. Whether the rewards are explicit, like bonuses or gift cards, or implicit, like promotions, choice assignments, windows or corner offices, etc. Observant employees will understand the situation and will resent if they are being "gamed". If the office brown-nose gets promoted, there will be more brown-nosers all of a sudden. If the boss is ethical and shows intolerance for cutting corners or sacrificing integrity, there will be a lot more ethical employees. And vice versa.

  •  
    8

    ToRWR@...

    03/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: When Incentives Fail

    A prime example of rewards "failing" is shown by how
    companies have been rewarded by the market: turn a big
    profit for the quarter (and to hell with the future).

  •  
    9

    Michael Fitzgerald

    03/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: When Incentives Fail

    these are great comments. It's very interesting to hear from those who've read the book, and especially those who know the research behind it.

    michael

  •  
    10

    dkg50

    03/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: When Incentives Fail

    Not everyone works for incentives. There are actually those that would prefer not to have incentives offered. Sometimes incentives can have a negative effect (as noted above) and can actually cause the opposite of what the expectation is to happen. If a worker only does their job to get the incentive of (?) then they are obviously not happy in their job. If they really like their jobs then they don't need incentives to do it well.

  •  
    11

    Annalon

    03/14/09 | Report as spam

    RE: When Incentives Fail

    I agree with dkg50 that if a you really like your job then you want to do it well.

    I had two children who participated in the Pizza Hut reading program. One who LOVED to read, read more books and even tackled some higher than his reading level. The other, who NEVER liked to read, read the skinniest, most juvenile books she could find. They both got a pizza. After a while, the one who liked to read didn't think it was fair because he actually read more books but could get only 1 pizza at a time, plus his books were more difficult to read. So he stopped doing the program - but kept on reading anyway. The one who didn't like reading continued, regularly earning a pizza - but as soon as the program was over, never read a book again unless it was an assignment and she had to!

    So there you have it. The book lover didn't need an incentive and once the reward was over the other one hadn't really changed her behavior at all.

  •  
    12

    q8ystyle

    03/15/09 | Report as spam

    RE: When Incentives Fail

    I myself think there should be a more detailed definition of incentives. For example, Fees for not picking your children on time from school should be considered as a penalty/sabction scheme. However, getting a percentage on revenues you have generated for your company is to be a reward scheme. This differentiation would make life much easier when having this debate.

  •  
    13

    DerekIrvine

    03/17/09 | Report as spam

    Incentives Fail. Recognition Works. What's the Difference?

    Incentives fail. Recognition for effort works. What's the difference? The answer lies in understanding the fundamental difference between incentives and recognition. I liked very much a client's definition of incentive as "push the button, get the pellet." You are told in advance "if you do this, you get that." You are pre-directing effort in a way that eliminates the need for creativity and can foster the negative effects the book discusses. Incentives are all about the stuff.

    Recognition however is a much more time intensive effort that delivers the positive results companies are looking for when they think about these programs. Recognition is based on fostering an environment in which employees WANT to perform, then letting managers and even colleagues acknowledge exceptional effort and praise deserving employees for it.

    The confusion arises because recognition can include a reward, but it is not about the "stuff." Recognition is about encouraging, acknowledging and appreciating desired BEHAVIORS.

    This is a critical difference to understand by any company desiring to influence employee behavior without stifling innovation, action and creativity.

    A great deal more on this topic of how to do recognition right is available here: http://globoforce.blogspot.com

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Top Rated
    advertisement
    • Click Here
    • Click Here
    • Click Here
    advertisement