BNET Insight

BNET1

The one thing you need to know today.

What Baseball Can Teach Managers About Pay Inequality

October 22nd, 2008 @ 5:30 am

4 Comments

Categories: Management, Research, Uncategorized, Workplace

Tags: Team, Performance, Baseball, Inequality, Team Management, Performance Management, Management, Human Resources, Workforce Management, Jessica Stillman

  • What Baseball Can Teach Managers About Pay InequalityThe Find: If you manage a team of people who work towards a common goal and perform similar tasks, should you pay them basically equally or offer incentives and unequal rewards? Baseball may provide the answer.
  • The Source: The Random Rantings blog of London Business School professor Freek Vermeulen, citing research by Notre Dame management professor, Matt Bloom.

The Takeaway: Vermeulen has heard plenty of debate on team pay inequality:

“You should pay them all the same” some loudly proclaim, “because they’re a team and you don’t want to create envy and inequality within the group!” Others will bellow in agony: “But you need to incentivize people – stupid!; equal pay kills their motivation; you should pay more to people who (seem to) contribute more, to keep them happy while stimulating the others to better themselves!!”

Now, he thinks he may have found a study that could settle this common office debate. How do you find comparable teams to use as research subjects with known salaries and objective and transparent performance statistics? Notre Dame professor Matt Bloom worked out a solution: use baseball.

Matt collected performance data on 1,644 players in 29 teams, assessing their individual performance through batting runs, fielding runs, earned run averages, pitching runs, player ratings… For team performance, he measured a combination of on-field performance and financial performance, using game wins and revenue and valuation data.

Salary data came from USA Today. He created an indicator of “pay dispersion” that registered the size of pay inequality on each team and then used all these numbers to quantify whether teams were better off with relatively equal pay or with high pay differentials between players.

The final conclusion: “baseball teams performed better if the salaries of the players were not too different from each other.” The numbers indicated that the performance of even highly paid players suffered when pay inequality in a team was high.

The Question: The findings may be true for baseball, but do the conclusions hold in an office environment?

(Image of baseball game at sunset by Bob Jagendorf, CC 2.0

Have an idea about the one thing managers need to know today? Submit it to BNET1.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Michael.Mattis@...

    10/22/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Baseball Can Teach Managers About Pay Inequality

    Evidently a lot of what we think we know about the Great American Pastime we don't really know at all. According to a new book reviewed in the FT, an Englishman, Henry Chadwick, and not Abner Doubleday, invented the game:

    Next I suppose the Brazilians will be telling us they invented the airplane.

  •  
    2

    VT3000

    10/23/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Baseball Can Teach Managers About Pay Inequality

    Equal pay!!! wow, I hope that happens soon! happy Cant you have a poll or something???

  •  
    3

    nwm@...

    10/23/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Baseball Can Teach Managers About Pay Inequality

    Actually, the father of baseball was Harry Wright and he is buried at West Laurel Hill Cemetery in PA. He organized what we now know as Major League Baseball so players would be paid and gambling on games would cease to be the revenue source.
    More on Harry at forever-care.com

  •  
    4

    fbobberts

    10/23/08 | Report as spam

    RE: What Baseball Can Teach Managers About Pay Inequality

    On topic - what baseball really teaches us about pay is that it is possible to both underpay and overpay by significant amounts when evaluating talent, and that (even for those brilliant at this in this sport) figuring who is really creating value while building a team in flight can be difficult. It also tells us that restricting the free agent rights of people in the early portion of their career can give unequal benefits to employers. Finally, an environment focused on finding the razor's edge of salary vs contract length with unlimited free agency will likely not promote an atmosphere of loyalty. Like any strategic decision, compensation is driven by the needs of the business and the market it is in, and these conditions are hugely different between the work a day world, where we are not usually trying to win a pennant on a distinct timeline, and baseball, where they usually are. Even the Cubs.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement