BNET Insight

BNET1

The one thing you need to know today.

Researchers to Managers: Employees CAN Change

August 4th, 2008 @ 12:07 pm

4 Comments

Categories: Management, Research

Tags: Employee, Performance, Manager, Performance Management, Human Resources, Workforce Management, Jessica Stillman

  • This old dog isn’t learning any new tricks.The Find: Managers who believe in their employees’ capacity to change and grow are more likely to provide them support and to spot changes in performance than those who believe you can’t teach an old dog new tricks.
  • The Source: “Managers’ Implicit Assumptions About Personnel” in Current Directions in Psychological Science by Peter Heslin and Don VandeWalle and cited in the BPS Research Digest blog.

The Takeaway: When two professors sat down to review the scientific literature on the relationship between managers’ assumptions and employees’ performance, they found something simple but powerful: managers who believe people can’t change neither see improvements or declines in employees’ performance nor took steps to help their employees develop their skills. On the flip side, managers with a healthy belief in individuals’ ability to grow and improve provided more coaching and mentoring and reacted more quickly to changes in employee performance.

One study, for example, involved showing managers negative information about an employee’s performance before showing them the same employee performing well in a negotiation exercise. Those managers who were skeptical of people’s ability to change their ways were more likely to fail to see the employee’s excellent performance for what it was. In the real world this would obviously mean squandered talent and one angry employee.

There’s nothing earth shattering in the conclusions, but they have real world applications according to the authors. Heslin and VandeWalle conclude that “cues for managers to adopt a growth mindset [a belief that people can change] could be built into performance evaluation systems. These cues might include written, verbal and video-based reminders to managers… that all employee skills tend to be developed over time with practice and helpful feedback.”

The Question: True or false: most employees can grow and develop with management support?

(Image of old dog refusing to learn new tricks by dro!d, CC 2.0)

Have an idea about the one thing managers need to know today? Submit it to BNET1.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    djmorto

    08/05/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Researchers to Managers: Employees CAN Change

    Absolutely agree. The growth mindset is key to our
    competitive advantage in any company and the ability
    to make change. I am a VP of HR and have always
    supported this philosophy. Employees have always
    risen to the occasion in my experience if they are given
    the information they need to change. Sometimes this
    takes the form of individual feedback based on a solid
    and clear criteria based performance management
    system. In other cases is information that upper
    management must give employees collectively so
    groups, depts, teams and even whole companies can
    change. The basis for change is that you buy into
    "things can improve". This is a basic tenant that most
    people can agree with and get behind. If you have
    other motives you don't have much to sell. The odd
    employee who can not change has generally other
    issues, but even then will make strides for
    improvement. My organization recently changed 250
    people's jobs who had been in them for anywhere from
    10-25 yrs. As you say in your article, once managers
    were convinced this could be done, we were 80% of the
    way there. This does require a supportive company
    structure and can be undone very quickly when that
    goes away. So, growth strides (new tricks) need
    reinforcement until they are habitual. Often times
    companies too early on abandon the reinforcing
    systems because of wanting to gain the rewards when
    the new behaviors have not moved into sustain mode. I
    believe some managers are threatened by this thinking
    because that means they have to change too and their
    charismatic leadership style vs enablement style
    (preferred style in my book) is replaced more
    competent employees. It also requires a company
    structure that managers are not familiar with or willing
    to invest in. One more thing, I have dogs (12 and 13
    yrs old), they are continually learning!

  •  
    2

    irwinl

    08/05/08 | Report as spam

    Can office jerks change?

    Ideally, managers should be more than just task givers and output collectors. They should also be "coaches/trainers" (I apologize for the cliche) who invest more time knowing the strengths of their employees, even the unpopular office jerks (http://blogs.bnet.com/bnet1/?p=514&tag=content;col1).

    This brings me to a bigger problem: Can office jerks change?

    (Imagine the co-worker you hate the most before you think of the answer)

  •  
    3

    Lux131313

    08/05/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Researchers to Managers: Employees CAN Change

    I agree with your premise that employees CAN change, but the question is whether you want them to? Before suggesting any changes, it is imperative that management understand why the employee is having issues in the first place. Maybe the employee's ideas/work product are different but actually an overall improvement to the Company's current standards. Trying to force change may actually be a step backward if management is forward thinking in the first place.

  •  
    4

    tramky

    10/31/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Researchers to Managers: Employees CAN Change

    Well, Lux really threw a wrench into the machinery. Are there employees doing better work than their managers think they are? Maybe you don't really WANT some employees to change! How do you figure THAT out?! Managers are the sole judges of performance. I've seen many careers interrupted and even ended by managers who had their own toxic agendas and attacked the reputations and work results of good employees, trashing them on performance appraisals and talking negatively about them to other managers, wiping out opportunities for lateral transfers for their targets.

    A lot of the talk on here assumes that managers are competent & ethical. That, in my experience, is a huge assumption. It is NOT the case that companies normally work in ways that benefit them--in large companies it is possible to have pockets, even LARGE pockets, of management that are terribly toxic for employees and who destroy people & teams. I've seen it in person, and it's not pretty. I've never forgotten it, and I've never forgiven it.

    What turns around comes around. Later I owned my own business and was in position to view my former employer in which this stuff had occurred as a potential provider of services to my business; of course that company was excluded from consideration off the top. None of MY business & money were they getting.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement