BNET Insight

BNET1

The one thing you need to know today.

Congressman: Pay Every American a Carbon Dividend

March 11th, 2009 @ 6:17 am

1 Comment

Categories: Green Business, News, Uncategorized

Tags: Permit, Revenue, Dividend, Carbon, American, Operational Accounting, Personal Finance, Social Security, Financial Planning, Financial Accounting

  • The Find: A bill soon to be introduced in Congress offers a bold proposal: pay every American a dividend from the profits from selling carbon emission permits.
  • The Source: A post by Ben Jervey on GOOD Magazine’s The New Ideal blog.

The Takeaway: President Obama’s budget calls for a cap and trade scheme to cut the emissions of greenhouse gases and tackle global warming. The basic idea is simple: set a ceiling for emissions, allocate permits and create a system that allows emitters to buy and sell these permits so the market sets the price of carbon. It’s an intriguing idea, but one that would almost certainly raise the price of energy for everyone from low income families to owners of luxury yachts. Now there’s another market-based approach to tackling the issue – pay the profits raised from the sale of the permits back to the American people directly. A bill outlining this type of scheme, known as ‘cap-and-dividend,’ will be introduced by Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) this week. It proposes that,

All (or most) of the revenue raised from carbon permit auctions would go back, in equal shares, to the American people…. like the Alaskan Permanent Fund, which sends everyone in the state a check each year for their share of oil revenue. Higher energy costs, then, would be offset by monthly or quarterly direct deposits into the bank accounts of anyone with a social security number. Because everyone gets an equal share, it becomes a progressive system that best benefits the lower-income families who’d potentially suffer the most from rising energy prices. The paybacks would more than make up the difference for a poor family with smaller energy demands, but it wouldn’t cover the increased costs for the millionaire with two 4,000 square foot houses and a private jet.

Research shows that 60 percent of American families would come out ahead under the proposal, but questions remain, including whether revenue generated by such a system would be better spent investing in R&D and green infrastructure. Nonetheless, it’s an idea worth pondering.

The Question: Is a cap-and-dividend scheme the best alternative?

(Image of smokestack by Senor Codo, CC 2.0)

Have an idea about the one thing managers need to know today? Submit it to BNET1.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    toddwilkinson@...

    03/11/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Congressman: Pay Every American a Carbon Dividend

    Let me see if I can follow this circular logic:

    ---> Gov't collects more money as the Cap & Trade systems "taxes" energy companies --> Energy Companies raise rates to citizens to pay for "tax" --> Citizens collect money back from Gov't to help pay for increased energy rates --> Repeat.

    How does this make sense other than allow the Govt to grow ever larger, and drive inflation? There's no driver for energy companies to create eco-friendly solutions. This looks like yet another wealth distribution scheme (given the lower, lower-middle class will come out ahead again due to lower energy consumption) disguised as "change-driven" energy policy.

    Next.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement